Home Blog Page 7

Perversion vs. Paravartan

0

In the year 1984, immediately after the assassination of Smt. Indira Gandhi, a seminar on communalism was organized by the Central Government in Chennai. Speaking at the seminar, Sri C. Subramaniam, the former Defence Minister, said that he could not understand as to how even many Congressmen were worried and concerned about the conversions of a handful of Harijans to Islam at Meenakshipuram. “What would it matter?” he asked.

I thrust myself as one of the speakers in the seminar and reminded him of what Jinnah had told Jawaharlal Nehru prior to the partition. When Nehru had ridiculed the demand for Pakistan as a fantasy, Jinnah retorted that Pakistan became an established fact even when the first Hindu of this land was converted to Islam, nearly twelve hundred years ago when Turks invaded our country. What he was now seeking through the demand for partition was nothing but a political recognition of this reality. If, according to Jinnah, one Hindu becoming a Muslim was sufficient for the demand of a separate land, what of the five hundred Harijans embracing Islam enbloc in the tiny village of Meenakshipuram? Why do responsible citizens like Mr. C. Subramaniam fail to realise the potent dangers of such mass conversions either to Islam or to Christianity, was the question I posed at that seminar.

In fact, the Meenakshipuram conversion episode was a providential design to awaken the Hindus to the dangers of such happenings. Prior to Meenakshipuram and even after Meenakshipuram, such proselytisation efforts are always going on in different parts of the country. But the Hindu society does not bother about such happenings. Mahakavi Bharathiar had commented once in his journal in 1906:

The Christian Padri has converted nearly 300 Harijans at Eluru in Andhra. Such conversions occur very often at different plakhes of our country. This should cause great concern as the Hindu population is slowly depleting. I have read about a python sleeping unconcerned when its tail was on fire. Such a suicidal act on the part of Hindus would only result in total destruction of them. Oh Hindus! Awaken! Those who are unconcerned about the depletion of Hindu population are only blind to reality.

Even Swami Vivekananda warned in those days that every man going out of the Hindu pale is not only a man less, but also an enemy the more. But the society never paid any serious attention to this sane advice.

Origin of Mass Conversions in India

Religious proselytisation, which is alien to our culture started with the Islamic invasions over Bharat. The invaders were not only interested in looting the wealth of our nation but they were zealous about converting our people to Islam by force. Thousands were either killed or converted by coercion during Islamic rule. Once the tidal wave of the foreign aggression receded, some efforts were made both in North West and Sind, the early targets of Islamic proselytisation, to bring the perverts back to Hindu fold. Devala Smriti emphasised the need for such reconversions and also enumerated the process of reconversion. But unfortunately this practice of bringing back our people to Hindu fold died out in due course.

Conversion has been for the last one thousand years, a great problem, of which, we had utterly failed to realise the disastrous implications. In our innocence, we fondly believed that the faiths of the aggressors too were similar to ours; that they were merely different modes of spiritual approach; that conversions to their faiths was just a personal affair. We never looked around to find out the fate of nations which had fallen a prey to the invasion of these faiths; how Nation after Nation with their culture, history, tradition and values were sucked into the new aggressors’ ways of life; and how, in short, the change to those faiths was not a simple case of religious conversion, but total alienation from the national society.

Historical Blunders

It is very surprising that even the Vijayanagar Empire, established with the sole aim of protecting Hindu culture in the down south and resisting the Islamic invasions, did not take any solid step to reconvert the Muslim converts back to Hindu fold during their reign. Those kings who brought an end to the Muslim rule even in Madurai and renovated all the temples desecrated by Malikafur didn’t do anything worth the name to order all the non-Hindus to revert back to Hindu fold. The result of this neglect is obvious today. Also, they remained silent spectators of Portuguese proselytisation activities carried on zealously in the western coastal areas. This has alienated a sizable fishermen population in Kerala from the Hindu fold to Christianity.

The main cause for the defeat of Rama Raya in the battle against the Sultanate power and the downfall of the great Vijayanagar empire was the recruitment of large number of Muslims in the army, without having an insight into their political behaviour pattern. Unable to understand that Islam was not just an alternate way of worship but an imperialist ideology, dressed up in religious verbiage, they gave employment to these Muslim mercenaries in all positions high and low.

Even the “Hindavi Swaraj” established by Chatrapati Shivaji did not envisage the potent dangers of allowing the Muslim converts to remain as they were. Even during the Maratha empire the Englishmen who came for trading were allowed to freely practise their religion and also propagate it. The Portuguese proselytisation activities alienated a sizable fishermen population in the West coast and the inquisition in Goa was unquestioned and unchecked by any Hindu ruler.

An interesting episode in Kashmir could illustrate the thoughtless and suicidal approach of Hindu society to matters like reconversion of Muslims to Hindu fold. A delegation of Muslims approached the then ruler of Kashmir Sri Ranbir Singh (probably in the 1840s) with a request to arrange for their coming back to Hindu fold as their forefathers had been converted to Islam only by force. The Maharajah was pleased with the idea and assured the delegation that he would do the needful. The king consulted the pandits of Kashmir on the issue. They advised him to seek opinions of pandits of Kashi as they were more knowledgeable than them; the Maharajah sought their advice. They said that there was no provision for reconversion in Hindu Dharma Shastras and any attempt on the part of the king to set a new precedent would make the king tainted with brahmahatya dosha and all the Brahmins of Kashi threatened to drown themselves in Ganga if the king was bent upon reconverting the Muslims against their wishes. The king was disappointed and did not care to violate their ordinance. The result is that now Kashmir has become a chronic headache for us and the entire country is suffering from the sin of not taking the Muslims of Kashmir back to Hindu fold.

No wonder, with this simplicity on our part, conversion to non-Hindu faiths went on merrily as a one-way traffic without let or hindrance, with what catastrophic results we all know. This is because our dharmic lawgivers had failed to take a fresh look at the prevalent interpretation of Dharma and proclaim a new smriti so that society could meet the looming threat.

Swami Dayananda and the Shuddhi Movement

It was Swami Dayananda who first made a bold attempt at reconverting the Muslims and Christians back to the Hindu fold by making the Shuddhi ceremony a part of the Arya Samaj activity. Thus, he cried a halt to the one-way exodus from the Hindu to the non-Hindu faiths and opened its doors to all those who were willing to come back to their ancestral religion. The Swami felt that unless immediate steps were taken to stem the Hindu exodus, the fate of Hindus and of the country would be sealed. The Swami launched a mass Shuddhi campaign for bringing the converted back to the Hindu fold.

In the 1920s, the Moplahs started attacking the innocent Hindus in Kerala. They murdered 1500 Hindus, abducted thousands of women, forcibly converted 20,000 persons to Islam (refer the Servants of India Committee Report). Swami Shraddhananda, a prominent leader of the Arya Samaj, started reconverting Muslims by the thousands. This was in response to the mass conversions of Hindus to Islam during the Moplah riots in Kerala province and elsewhere in the country.

Muslims launched a countrywide crusade for converting helpless Hindus to Islam. A booklet was published by Hasan Nizami in 1923 asking the Muslims to convert Hindus to Islam by all means fair and foul; to concentrate among the Harijans so that, if all untouchable communities become Muslims then the Muslim population will outnumber Hindus, or become at least equal to that of Hindus.

Swami Shraddhananda uncovered this great conspiracy and published a pamphlet, The Hour of Danger in which he had warned Hindu society to be on its guard against such mischievous machinations. The Swami exposed the evil designs of Muslims for the spread of Islam and how a secret extensive spy network was being built by the conspirators to convert our Motherland into Dar-ul-Islam.

Because of these strenuous efforts of Swami Shraddhananda, thousands of converts began to respond to his appeal to re-embrace Hindu Dharma. It is said that in the first half of 1923 alone, more than 18,000 Muslims returned to the Hindu fold in some parts of Uttar Pradesh. Not surprisingly, the Congress leaders of those days denounced Swami Shraddhananda for his Shuddhi movement. Members of the Arya Samaj who were engaged in Shuddhi work were kept out of the Congress Executive.

Emboldened by this attitude of the Congress leaders and annoyed by the work of reconversion of Muslims to Hindu fold by Swami Shraddhananda, and egged by Mullahs, a Muslim fanatic called Abdul Rashid assassinated the Swamiji on 23rd December 1926. Thus, the Shuddhi Movement suffered a setback. The Mullahs of Deoband offered special prayers for the soul of the assassin!

Other Pioneers

Another note worthy person in the field of reconverting the apostates is Shri Gajanan Bhaskar Vaidya who started the “Hindu Missionary Society” with the declared intention of admitting any non-Hindu to Hindu society who wished to adopt Hindu Dharma.

Shri Masurkar Maharaj, a vigorous sannyasi, brought about a mass shuddhi of the Gavadas in Goa. The Gavadas are village peasants and they were nominally Christians under the pressure and fear of Portuguese rule. It was a feat of great daring and heroism on the part of Shri Masurkar Maharaj and his workers to bring about this mass reconversion at the time when Goa was still under Portuguese rule. Brahmachari Dattamurthiji of Masurashram was another noteworthy person who was engaging himself in Shuddhi movement.

Reconvert the Perverts

In fact, after Swami Shraddhananda, it is only the Vishva Hindu Parishad (VHP) which has taken up Paravartan as a major activity. In 1967, nearly one thousand Christian fishermen re-embraced Hindu Dharma in Idinthakarai, a tiny village of coastal Tamilnadu. Shri Guruji Golwalkar highly appreciated the move of the VHP workers in this direction and said that Idinthakarai would generate similar healthy trends elsewhere also. This was followed by several Paravartan programmes all over the country.

In Rajasthan nearly 54,000 Muslim Meherats, the descendants of Prithiviraj Chauhan, have been brought back to the Hindu fold in 148 shuddhi programmes in the Merwara-Magra region. Large-scale reconversions have taken plakhe in Orissa, Bihar, Karnataka, Andhra and Tamilnadu; two lakh persons have been brought back to the Hindu fold so far.

A Demographic siege

As no concerted effort has been made in the past to stop further conversions and also reconvert the earlier converts, many areas of our country are slowly becoming Hindu minority areas. It is a historical fact that the areas in which Hindu population declined and the non-Hindu population rose above 50% have ceased to be parts of our punyabhoomi Bharat. To cite a few examples, today’s Afghanistan (once Gandhar), Pakistan, Baluchisthan, Punjab, Sind and Sonar Bangla. We know very well about what is happening in Kashmir and Assam.

The random survey conducted by the Central Health and Welfare Ministry in the year 1988 shows that while 9% of the Muslim families only took to family planning whereas 14% of the Hindu families were restricting their population by taking to family planning immediately after the birth of the second child. On an average every Muslim has married more than one wife and had begotten not less than six children.

During the last few decades a substantial proportion of the population in the north-eastern border States has become Christian. The conversion to Christianity during the British regime was much less in spite of the State patronage when compared to the growth of Christianity in Independent Bharat where a secular State exists.

Christians now constitute more than 85% of the population in Nagaland and Mizoram, about 65% in Meghalaya and about 35% in the traditionally assertive Hindu province of Manipur. It is worth remembering that there were just 14 Christians in all in Manipur, in 1910. The percentage of Christians in Orissa has gone up from 0.9% in 1951 to 2.10 in 1991. The increase is sharp in the districts of Ganjam, Koraput, Phulvani and Sundergarh. Many Christian organisations are actively engaged in proselytisation activity in these districts. If you look at the growth of Christians in the north-eastern region of our country you would be appalled at the multiplication of Christians by proselytisation. The entire political scenario of the northeast is controlled today by the Church and its agents. Every census enumeration after Independence has shown a clear decline in Hindu population and a steady increase in Christian and Muslim figures.

In Kerala 19.32% of the population has been converted to Christianity. They have made great strides in Tamilnadu, Goa, Bihar, Orissa, West Bengal and Andhra Pradesh. It is astonishing and agonising to note that in the last fifty years of independent rule, 40 districts have become Muslim dominated districts. Almost in many of these districts the Muslim population is above 20%. Surprisingly, the Government of Bharat declared these 40 districts as ‘minority dominated districts’ to which objections were raised in Lok Sabha. Hence, they were renamed as ‘districts having larger concentration of minorities’.

In a reply to the question of Shri. G.M. Banatwala in the Lok Sabha on 18th March 1988, Shri Edwardo Faleiro informed that one bank in each of these districts was made responsible for the minorities. In order to monitor the loan applications of minority of the persons of minority groups. Polytechnics were started in all these 40 districts, exclusively for Muslim students. Engineering colleges were also started in some of these districts. Minority Finance Commissions were set up to advance loans, only to Muslims, for setting up business or trade. Special Coaching Centres were set up in these districts for training Muslim youth for I. A. S. and I. P. S. services.

Even during British regime, Assam was flooded with Muslims from East Bengal. The then Chief Minister of Assam, Sadullah, encouraged Muslims to come over and settle in Assam to accelerate the growth of Muslims as aptly observed by Wavel in his diary. These infiltrators have managed to register themselves as citizens of our country and they have become voters also. In 1967, Shri Fakruddin Ali Ahmed could win the Lok Sabha elections only with the one lakh votes of infiltrators. Not one Muslim foreigner has been detected, disfranchised, and deported to Bangladesh till this date. Bangladesh has opened sluice gates to deluge the province of Assam with Muslims. It is a matter of grave concern because when the Muslims were only 24.28% of the total population in 1941, we had to lose a territory of Bharat in the name of Pakistan.

Similarly Christians are dominating the following provinces: Kerala (Southern districts), Jharkhand, Tribal districts of Madhya Pradesh, Tribal districts in Orissa, Nagaland, Mizoram, Hill areas of Manipur and Tripura, Meghalaya and Arunachal Pradesh. There is also a phenomenal growth of Muslims in the sensitive northeast region. The increase of Muslim population in the northeast, particularly in Assam, is due to this unchecked largescale infiltration of Muslims from Bangladesh. These Bangladeshi Muslims have slowly and steadily crept into Delhi, Bombay, Lucknow and other major industrial cities causing communal tensions in these areas. Since 1981 the infiltration has been increasing without any check. In Delhi, the proportion of Muslims in the population has arisen from less than 6% in 1951 to nearly 10% in 1991.

Conversion fuels Separatism

It is not only the numerical strength of infiltrators, which is going up steadily in many parts of our country but also their economic clout. The infiltrators who came to Bharat were extremely poor but have become rich, and that too, through their criminal and smuggling activities. Some of the richest Muslims in the country are to be found in Tamilnadu, Bombay, Jamshedpur and Delhi. Shri S. Naspar Mohammed Jaffer in his letter in The Hindu dated 03.11.83 stated that Bharat would become a Muslim majority country by the year 2281. But Tamilnadu might become a Muslim majority province even much earlier i.e. by the year 2231.

Referring to this statement one Shri. M. V. Padmanabhan of Kolar wrote in The HIndu dated 14.11.83 that Muslim population growth follows a geometrical progression while the Hindu growth is only arithmetical. Hence, he argued that Bharat would become a Muslim majority country even by the year 2051. According to Home Ministry sources, in 25 Parliament Constituencies in Uttar Pradesh, and 146 of the 294 Assembly segments in Bengal, the demographic picture has changed to such an extent that Muslims are in a commanding position to influence the electoral victories of the political parties. Similar is the picture in several other States also.

Sometime in the mid eighties, Muslims of Murshidabad district in West Bengal raised slogans that since they were in a majority they wanted to secede from Bharat and join the Islamic Republic of Bangladesh. This is an early warning of the coming storm. On the basis of the above facts, are we not drifting towards another partition? Is it not the duty of every Hindu to see that this drift towards another catastrophe is halted at some point?

Conversion by Deception

How did the converts leave their ancestral home? Was it out of their own sweet will and out of conviction of the superiority of those alien faiths? Well, history does not record a single notable instance of that sort. On the contrary, the reason was the fear of death or coercion or the various temptations of power, position etc. There was a lot of deception also. For instance, consider this well-known trick used by the missionaries: a piece of beef or a loaf used to be thrown into the water tank or well of a village and the villagers ignorant of what had happened used to take the water as usual. On the next morning the missionary would come and declare that they had used the polluted water and the Village Panchayat would take a suicidal decision ostracizing the people who had drunk the polluted water. Such outcastes had no other go but to embrace Christianity. Innumerable episodes and methods, such as these, can be cited; this is proselytisation by deception, pure and simple.

Islam and Christianity are not religions as we understand by the term, and their conversion was not of religious nature. They converted people with an intention of swelling their numbers for political domination. Islam and Christianity are imperialistic ideologies grabbing more and more land for their political domination in the garb of religion.

It will be interesting to mention that till as late as 1930s Muslims in large parts of Bharat including NWFP in Pakistan were governed by the Hindu law of succession because of their Hindu ancestry. Even after introduction of Muslim Shariat Law in the year 1937, the Muslims were given the option to be governed either by Hindu Laws or the Shariat Law. Even today, there are Muslim Rajputs, both in Bharat and Pakistan who are more proud of their Rajput lineage than of being Muslims. The Hindus therefore must invite the Muslims in the entire Akhand Bharat, to revert en masse to their original religion. Such reversion is possible and desirable because the Muslims are largely the descendants of Hindu apostates only. Reversion to Hindu Dharma will be nothing but home-coming, a simple return to their ancestral faith.

Assimilative Capacity of Sanatana Dharma

Assimilation of outsiders has been one of the strong points of Hindu Dharma, and there is no reason why we cannot absorb and assimilate millions of Hindu apostates and their progeny. If Muslims can seek converts why can’t Hindus seek ‘reverts’? There is nothing unethical about re-assimilating the entire mass of Hindu apostates.

There are many doubting Thomases in our society questioning the propriety of reconverting our Christian and Muslim brothers back to Hindu fold. For them Swami Vivekananda’s reply would be the fitting answer. A press correspondent wanted to know the opinion of Swamiji on the matter of receiving back into Hindu Dharma those who had been converted from it. Swamiji replied that all those perverts ought to be taken back, saying that we would otherwise decrease in numbers:

…when the Mohammedans first came we are told – I think on the authority of Ferishta, the oldest Mohammedan historian – to have been six hundred millions of Hindus. Now we are about two hundred millions.

Again, the vast majority of Hindu perverts to Islam and Christianity is perverts by the Sword.

Ceremonies of expiation are no doubt suitable in the case of willing reconverts returning to their Mother-religion, as it were. In large-scale reconversions even those ceremonies need not be imposed.

Swamiji also wanted that all those returning converts should be allowed to choose their own way of worship. He commented vehemently,

Come and see what the padris are doing in Dakshin. They are converting by lakhs the lower classes of Travancore – nearly one fourth of the population has become Christians.

Today almost 20% are Christians in Kerala. These Christians are mostly concentrated in southern Kerala. Northern Kerala is dominated by the Muslims who form 23.33% of the state population.

Anti-Conversion Legislation: Early attempts

Shri. R. R. Diwakar, a Member of the Constituent Assembly wanted an amendment to the clause regarding freedom of religion, saying that freedom of religion should not include ‘Proselytisation’.

He argued that proselytisation would give undue advantage to other religions and put Hindus at a disadvantageous position. But the representatives of the proselytising religions went in strong delegation to Sardar Patel and made him not to accept the amendment. Diwakar was of the opinion that in a democracy of the type that we are suffering from, adding numbers to vote banks is a clear advantage given to proselytising religions and to that extent a disadvantage to the Hindu Dharma which does not indulge in conversion.

Article 25 (1) of the Constitution of Bharat reads as follows:

Subject to public order, morality and health and to other provisions of this part, all persons are equally entitled to freedom of conscience and the right to freely profess, practise and propagate religion.
Misusing this provision in our Constitution, the Christians and Muslims have been freely engaging themselves in converting the illiterate masses. The Governments of Madhya Pradesh, Orissa and Arunachal had to enact legislations banning the conversions by the following respective bills:

  1. Madhya Pradesh Dharma Swatantrya Adhiniyani 27 of 1968
  2. Orissa Freedom of Religion Act 2 of 1968
  3. Arunachal Pradesh Freedom of Religion Act 1978.

Christians went to the Supreme Court challenging these Acts. The Supreme Court observed:

What Article 25(l) grants is not the right to convert another person to one’s own religion, but to transmit or spread one’s religion by an exposition of its tenets.

It has to be remembered that Article 25 (1) guarantees “freedom of conscience” to every citizen and not merely to the followers of one particular religion, and that, in turn, postulates that there is no fundamental right to convert another person to one’s own religion. If a person purposely undertakes the conversion of another person to his religion, as distinguished from his effort to transmit or spread the tenets of his religion, that would infringe on the “freedom of conscience” guaranteed to all citizens of the country alike. What is freedom for one, is freedom for the other, in equal measure, and there can therefore be no such thing as a fundamental right to convert any person to one’s own religion.

In spite of this judgement, conversions go on scot-free in this country. The disastrous effects of our Government’s policy with its pseudo-secular approach are once again revealed eloquently, by the census figures.

Divide and Convert

Between 1935 and 1947 the number of converts to Christianity in Nagaland rose to only about 30,000, but between 1947 and 1951 it rose to 98,068 thanks to the religious freedom given by our Constitution to foreign missionaries. It is worth noting that total number of Nagas converted in 1891, almost after a half century of missionary activity, was only 211 and in 1901 it was 579. This shows the strong cultural bonds even among vanavasis and the dismal failure of missionary proselytisation activity in the beginning.

Taking undue advantage of the concessions and the privileges thrown to the religious minorities by our secular Governments, many evangelical missions of international order are working zealously in enticing the vanavasis and dalits to embrace Christianity. Several Liberation Theological Movements have sprung up in the past 50 years.

Similarly Islamic Tableque Movements are working in full swing with an eye to Islamise the 15 crore Harijans. The converts have been alienated from their national ethos and cultural moorings. This has caused much damage to our national unity, as is seen in several districts and provinces of our country.

The Christian Missionaries have divided this country into 107 parts and in every part, one foreign country is providing assistance for the purposes of proselytisation. Nearly 27 thousand square miles of area of this country is under the direct influence of foreign missionaries. The number of foreign Christians entering Bharat for evangelical work has increased multi-fold since Independence. Roughly, it is estimated that nearly 10,000 foreign Christian Missionaries are roaming about in our country, proselytising the illiterate and poor masses to Christianity. The motivation for Christian evangelism is simple: Disrupt and Destroy. The missions make no secret of it. It is a mistake to think that Christian Missionary enterprise is a religious movement. It was a declaration of war and an attack on the religious and cultural set up of the people of our nation. It was always politically motivated.

Christian Intolerance

In all Christian dominated areas the Christians are generally intolerant of Hindu Dharma, customs and traditions. Rather they have purged Christian converts of all the influences of our tradition and culture. Among the Naga Christians even their traditional Naga dance and music has been replaced by Western dance and pop music. The Christian Missionaries are driving out the Hindus from the Christian areas. Whenever it is possible, such as in Mizoram, they are working for the establishment of a Christian State with the active assistance of pseudo-secular political parties. The glaring example is the election manifesto of the Pradesh Congress of Mizoram in the year 1989:

As Christians, it is our bounden responsibility to proclaim the Gospel, to explore ways and means of sending pilgrims to the Holy Land, to revise school syllabus on the basis of Christian principles.

The Christian Missionary Activities Enquiry Committee appointed by the Madhya Pradesh Government in 1954 was headed by Shri M. B. Niyogi, retired Chief Justice of the Nagpur High Court. This Committee visited 77 centres, contacted 11,360 persons from 700 villages, examined 375 written statements and interviewed various leading missionaries. After two years of arduous labour, the Committee was of the opinion that Christian Missionaries were encouraging anti-national activities among the converts and strongly recommended for legislation banning the proselytisation activities. The Committee also recommended many measures that would restrict the activities of Christian Padris. Though the Madhya Pradesh Government enacted a similar legislation, in the year 1968, it could not be effective as the Padris worked in connivance with the politicians at the State and the Centre.

The Powerful Christian Lobby

In Rajasthan, an attempt was made in the year 1970 by the then Chief Minister Shri Hardev Joshi to bring a legislation banning conversion by fraudulent means but could not be passed in the legislature as the Christian lobby was very strong. In Bihar, a private bill was introduced by Shri Gowri Shankar Dalmia in the year 1966 and this was not accepted by the Assembly as many MLAs yielded again to Christian lobbying. In Gujarat, in the year 1962 the then Chief Minister Shri Kanthilal Phoolchand Ghia introduced a bill to contain Christian conversions by fraudulent means but the Assembly was dissolved before the Bill could be passed.

Even in the Parliament, several attempts were made to pass legislations banning conversions. First, the Private Member Bill was introduced in the year 1954 by Shri Jetalal Harikrishna. Again, in 1960, Shri Prakash Veer Shastri a member of the Arya Samaj and Member of Parliament introduced a bill to ban conversions. This was supported by Shri Atal Behari Vajpayee, Dr. Ram Subhagh, Shri Mahavir Tyagi, Shri Seth Govind Das, Shri Maniben Patel and Shri Ranvir Singh. But many others became a prey to Christian lobbying and opposed the bill. Hence the bill could not be passed. In 1978, during Janatha Government Sri Om Prakash Tyagi, a Member of Parliament of the then ruling party introduced a Private Member bill on 21st November 1978. This was also defeated by the treacherous attempts of Christians.

It is worth mentioning here, that in the same year, Israeli Knesset (Parliament) passed a Law making it an offence punishable by five years in jail, and heavy fines, for anyone to offer material benefits to induce another person to change his or her religion. This measure was designed to curb Christian missionaries who had offered huge some of money and other economic benefits to enslave the souls of the poor. In spite of Christian opposition, the Law was passed.

Similarly Justice Venugopal Commission instituted to enquire into the riots of Mandaikkadu in Kanyakumari district in March 1982 observed that the proselytising efforts of the Christian Padris were chiefly responsible for the riots in the district and the Commission suggested that all proselytisations should be stopped forthwith by an immediate legislation. But nothing has been done in that direction by the Government till date.

The mass conversions of Harijans that took place in Kurayoor, Kooriyoor, Athiyoothu, Melamadai and Meenakshipuram in Tamilnadu were the results of such concerted efforts on the part of Islamic Organisations like South Indian Isha-at-ul-Islam, Minavar-ul-Islam and Jamat-e-Islam etc.

A Gentle Awakening

The Meenakshipuram episode sent shock waves among the Hindus and reached even persons at the political helm of affairs. Huge Hindu congregations became a reality in several places giving a call for mass awakening among the Hindus and issuing a warning to the proselytising religious groups.
The Parishad took upon the onerous task of retaining this awakening and launched upon a Mission, “Samskriti Raksha Yojana”. Though apparently there is no mass conversion activities at the surface level since then, we need not come to the conclusion that the proselytisation process has come to a halt. Hence, Dharma Prasar, a three pronged movement of the VHP is being implemented in every province, to stop this aggressive evangelism. What are the three dimensions of this work?

  1. Put an end to further conversions of Hindus either to Christianity or Islam – employ all possible means for the same. A Central Legislation banning religious conversions is a must in this direction.
  2. Reconvert all those who had been deceitfully proselytised in the past. Explore all possible avenues for the same.
  3. Stabilise those who come back to our fold and strengthen their Hindu faith – see that all reconverts are accepted in our society with respect and they are given the social equality.

In fact, today every politician in Kerala looks forward to fulfilling the dictates of the Church for his own survival in the political field. The Christians in the south and the Muslims in the north of Kerala determine the fate of the State. This pathetic situation has to be changed and Hindus should become the destiny makers in Kerala.

Today, nearly one lakh padris and 1.25 lakh Islamic Tableque karyakarthas are energetically working in Christianising and Islamising our nation. Christian and Muslim organisations are receiving nearly 1400 crores every year from foreign countries for the proselytising activities. There are more than 2500 Christian groups and cults receiving foreign money for proselytisation activities.

The Hindu Society is yet to fully awaken to the dangers posed by the pan-Christian and pan-Islamic forces to the very freedom and integrity of this nation. We shall have to organise mass programmes educating the public. People are to be educated about the historical blunders of our society and the need to take remedial measures at this critical period of our history.

Long ago, Swami Vivekananda gave a clarion call to our youth to stand in defence of Hindu Dharma:

Everyday the Christian missionaries are abusing Hindu dharma to your face and your brothers are being converted to Christianity. How can you bear to see all this? Where is your valour?

A hundred thousand men and women fortified with eternal faith in the Lord and nerved to lion’s courage by their sympathy for the poor and the fallen and the downtrodden will go over the length and breadth of the land preaching the gospel of salvation, the gospel of help, the gospel of social raising up, the gospel of equality.

Today, the VHP is repeating the same call to the present day vanaprasthis and youths. When the onslaught of alien religions is threatening the very existence of our Hindu nation, if there is an iota of the blood of the glorious Rishi Parampara still left in our veins, we should respond to this call and take a pledge to protect this Hindu nation at any cost. I hope that I have been able to convey the historical sequence of this vital issue and the need to pay immediate attention to solve this problem once and for all.

[Shri R. B. V. S. Manian is a senior functionary of the Vishwa Hindu Parishad, Tamil Nadu. This article is based on a talk to the VHP karyakartas.]

Christian Missions in India: ‘Education’ and Misrepresentation

0
xr:d:DAF9ouP-kc4:10,j:1485481588748626595,t:24022318

Two questions require separate consideration in any discussion of Christian missionary activity in India; these are, first, is missionary effort justifiable at all, and second, are the methods employed defensible? …It is impossible in a short essay to cover the whole field of missionary activity in India. I propose to deal with two special points, viz: Education, and Misrepresentation.

In India, any man may preach any doctrine, even upon the temple doorstep. He may believe what he will, if only his practice does not undermine the structure of organized society. There has never been a conflict between science and religion, for science has always been religious, and religion philosophical. It is a debated question whether there has ever been serious religious persecution in India; it is certain that it was the regular practice of Buddhist, Hindu, and some Muhammadan rulers, not merely to tolerate, but to support all sects alike. The missionary uses such tolerance to spread his own intolerance. His aim is to win souls for Christ; on him no other duty, principle or right can be allowed to interfere with his efforts to accomplish this end…

Missionaries in the last resort rely on force. This is notoriously so in China. “Force,” says Lafeadio Hearn (quoted Modern Review, III, 234), “the principal instrument of Christian propagandism in the past, is still the force behind our missions… We force missionaries upon China, for example, under treaty clauses extorted by war, and pledge ourselves to support them with gunboats and to exact enormous penalties for the lives of such as get themselves killed.” It would be the same in India, did not Hindu tolerance (apart from ‘India held by the sword’) make it needless; but even Hindu tolerance may some day be overstrained. If it be intolerance to force one’s way into the house of another, it by no means necessarily follows that it would be intolerance on the owner’s part to drive out the intruder.

The use of physical force is now indeed rejected; but all that money, social influence, educational bribery and misrepresentation can effect, is treated as legitimate. With all this is often combined great devotion and sincerity of purpose; the combination is dangerous in the extreme.
Education as a tool for Proselytisation

The most subtle, and in a certain sense, I suppose, effective proselytising agency in India is the Mission School. When adult conversion was found to proceed too slowly, it was decided to reach the children; hence the education bribe. The magic word itself stills opposition and enquiry; everyone is convinced that India needs educating, -it would be intolerant to deny to Christians a right to share In reply to: this noble work, impertinent to doubt their capability. A deliberate effort is being made to “keep the education of girls predominantly in Christian hands for perhaps a generation,” as it is thought that “upon the character and extent of the education provided for girls during the next few years will depend the spread of the Christian faith amongst all the higher castes of India.” Let us see what this education of girls in mission schools implies.

The education is undertaken with an ulterior motive, that of conversion. The first qualification of a teacher is therefore good sectarian Christianity; but for educational problems, – in these it is only necessary that she should be interested as a means to an end. However, the qualifications next desired are the ordinary qualifications of an English school-teacher; and in some cases the teacher may even be an University graduate. Such persons are sent out after a preliminary theological training, to teach in, or to take charge of, a mission school for girls. It is sometimes not decided until nearly the last moment to what part of the ‘mission field’ the teacher is to be sent. In any case she is not prepared for her work of education by a sympathetic study of local ideas, culture and traditions; if she studies the heathen religion at all, it is mainly in books written by those who do not sympathize with, and therefore do not fully understand it. Upon arrival, she finds herself in an altogether unfamiliar mental atmosphere; and she has only her Christian dogma, and at the best a good English education on classical lines, as her resources. Unless she is to be a preaching missionary, which as a teacher she is not proposing to do, she will probably learn no more of the mother-tongue of her pupils than suffices to direct her servants; the mission is short-handed, and she has to devote her whole time to class work and management… However keen her educational instinct, she has but one course to follow, – to create a spiritual desert in which to plant the Christian dogma. The greater part of the educational work of a mission is thus destructive.

Why then send our girls to mission schools? It is, I think, unwise. But some of us are so convinced of the importance of education that we are driven to take what we can get. In desiring for our girls the kind of education given in mission schools, it may be that we have accepted, at your valuation, that which has no value. It is true that Indian women are not even now uneducated or non-educated; but their education is highly specialised; it is rather culture than learning; it is not recognised as education by the modern world. The education of Indian women in the past fitted them to satisfy all the demands of a beautiful social ideal. Moulded upon the national ideals of character enshrined in the heroic and romantic literature familiar to Indian women, the beauty of Indian womanhood is beyond the breath of criticism. But the time has come when new demands are made upon the Indian people; in the national and civic synthesis in progress woman must play her part, as she has done in other syntheses before. Hence the need for an education no longer so exclusively specialised in relation to the home and to religion; the need for a scientific, geographical, historical synthesis. Recognition of this need has led to the desire for ‘English Education.’ Hesitation as to the real aims of the education offered has kept many from seeking it; it might have been well had it kept more, for too often have those who asked for bread been given a stone. Be that as it may, English education is now desired by many; that which purports to be this thing is offered at low rates in missionary schools.

The motif of the parent is not always a pure desire for education; it is sometimes a desire, not elsewhere unknown, to get something for nothing; sometimes a wish for mere material advantage for the girls. “Education is valued in India,” says the Archdeacon of Madras, “not so much because it is enlightening as because it is profitable,” and the missionary provides the easiest and cheapest avenue to the attainment of it. The first statement, in so far as it is true of modern India, is in direct opposition to Indian tradition, and to all that is best in Indian educational ideals.

Alas for wasted opportunity! To share in the true education of the Indian women were indeed a privilege. Behind her are the traditions of the great women of Indian history and myth, women strong in love and war, sainthood, in submission and in learning. She is still a guarded flame, this daughter of a hundred earls. She has not to struggle for a living in a competitive society, but is free to be herself. Upon her might be lavished the resources of all culture, to make yet more perfect that which is already most exquisitely so… You that have entered on the task so confidently, with the ulterior motive of conversion, have proved yourselves unfit.

Lay no blame on India for her slowness to accept the education you have offered to her women; praise her rather for the wise instinct that leads her to mistrust you. When you learn that none can truly educate those against whose ideals they are blindly prejudiced; when you realise that you can but offer new modes of expression to faculties already exercised in other ways; when you come with reverence, as well to learn as to teach; when you establish schools within the Indian social ideal, and not antagonistic to it- then, perhaps, we may ask you to help us build upon that great foundation. Not I trust, before; lest there should be too much for the daughters of our daughters to unlearn.
Demonisation of India and Indian religions

I speak now of Missionary misrepresentations. There is no part of the Christian code of ethics more consistently ignored in missionary circles, than the commandment, “Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour.”

It has been said, “By their fruits ye shall judge them.” Now if the fruits are grapes and figs, obviously the plants cannot be thorns or thistles. Hence the necessity for seeing and describing the fruits of Hinduism and Islam not as grapes or figs, but as something more appropriate to the missionary conception of the plant. The result is a relentless and systematic campaign of vilification of all things Indian. When I say, ‘necessity,’ I do not mean to say that the missionary quite deliberately falsifies the facts; on the contrary, he deceives himself as well as others; this is easy, for when the plant is already identified as a thistle, it is difficult to see figs upon it, even if they be there. The missionary is not aware of his false witness; he does generally present things as he sees them, but he sees through highly-coloured spectacles, which he removes when turning for comparison to inspect a Christian society at home. Thus he blackens India’s name, in all good faith, if one may call it so, and with the best intentions.

Those who wish to understand the process should study missionary literature, attend meetings, or read what missionaries say of those who see India in a different way. The method is simple and even obvious: Indian society, being like all others, mixed good and evil, the missionary (by no means free from the ordinary prejudices of other Anglo-Indians) sees and describes only evil; much that is merely strange he mistakes for evil, or notices only because it is strange; much he argues from particular instances to be universal; and all he sets down to the vile nature of the Hindu religion or of Islam or Buddhism as the case may be.

It is as if a Chinese visitor to England, courteously received, were to describe to his friends in Pekin, the effects of drink and poverty, agricultural depression, the overcrowded slums with their moral and physical results, sweated industries and dangerous trades, baby farming, street prostitution, the unemployed, and the idle rich, and ascribe all together to the vile nature of the Christian dogma. How easy it would be for him to do this has, by the way, been suggested by Mr. Lowes Dickinson, in his ‘Letters of a Chinaman.’ In just this way the missionary home on furlough preaches his mission sermon or gives his mission lecture; and the collection is swelled by the contributions of a sympathetic but uncritical congregation, not quite free from a suspicion of gratitude to God, that they are not as other (heathen) men. Missionary literature is similar. A typical volume is Miss Carmichael’s ‘Things as they are in Southern India’, from which I have already quoted. No volume could be a more impressive monument of the unfitness of the ordinary missionary to concern himself with the ‘civilization’ of India.

When in another man’s heart you can see only blackness, the fault is likely to be your own; when in another civilization you can see unutterable vileness, it means that you have not understood the parable of the mote and the beam. The method of such a book is simplicity itself; ignore the presence of virtues in non-Christian, and of vices in Christian, communities; describe all individual and local instances of evil known to you in a heathen society as typical; add violence of language and morbid religious sentiment, suggest all that you do not say, and the volume is completed.

Missionary Literature: Hate Campaign

I shall now quote some examples of missionary mis-statements from various less extreme sources. Easily refuted, such statements perhaps do less harm, except amongst the most ignorant, than do those which contain some element of truth, or extend a local or particular instance to cover a whole race of country.

Here is a statement absurd upon the face of it, yet given as an absolute fact, without any qualification at all: “The Hindu Christian (sic), who is going to disgrace his family once for all by breaking caste through baptism, will be quietly poisoned by his nearest relative to avert such a catastrophe.” Another statement in the same article perhaps explains the value of such a writer’s evidence: “Students of non-Christian religions must consider Heathenism on its worst side, if only to counteract the sentimental fancies of some who chatter about ‘the beautiful religions of the East.’ “

I take an even more serious example of very special pleading, from a more widely read volume ‘Lux Christi’, published for the Central Committee of the United Study of Missions. This book in 1903, the date of my copy, and the year after first publication, had already been reprinted seven times; I do not know how often since. Here we read (p. 211):

It should be borne in mind that the mighty systems of paganism in India, whether Hindu, Buddhist, or Muhammedan, are alike destitute of all those fruits of Christianity which we term charitable, philanthropic, benevolent. Where are the hospitals, dispensaries, orphanages, and asylums for the leper, the blind, the deaf and the mute? They have no place in the heathen economy.

Such a statement hardly needs refutation; but since there must be persons able to believe it, let me answer it by quotations from a single volume, the Sinhalese Mahavamsa. King Duttha Gamani (161-137, B. C.) on his death-bed could say:

I have daily maintained at eighteen different places, (hospitals) provided with suitable diet, and medicines, prepared by medical practitioners for the infirm.

Buddhadasa, (A.D. 339) was himself a physician. Out of benevolence towards the inhabitants of the island, the sovereign provided hospitals for all villages, and appointed physicians to them. The Raja, having composed the work Sarattha-sangaha, containing the substance of all medical science, ordained that there should be a physician for every twice five villages, and set apart one-twentieth of the produce of fields for the maintenance of these physicians. Parakrama Bahu (A. D. 1164-1197) built a large hall that could contain many hundreds of sick persons:

To every sick person he allowed a female servant (nurse), that they might minister to him by day and night, and furnish him with the physic that was necessary, and with diverse kinds of food… And he also made provision for the maintenance of wise and learned physicians who were versed in all knowledge and skilled in searching out the nature of diseases… And it was his custom, on the four Pohoya days (‘Sabbaths’) of every month, to cast off his king’s robes, and, after solemnly taking the five precepts, to purify himself and put him on a clean garment, and visit that hall together with his ministers. And being endued with ‘a heart full of kindness, he would look at the sick with an eye of pity, and being eminent in wisdom and skill in the art of healing, he would call before him the physicians that were employed and enquire fully of the manner of their treatment… also to some sick persons he would give physic with his own hands… unto such as were cured of their diseases he would order raiment to be given… In this manner indeed did this merciful king, free from disease himself, cure the sick of their diverse diseases from year to year.

Vijaya Bahu (A.D. 1236) “established a school in every village.” Such refutations could be multiplied indefinitely, but the association of charity with religion in modern India is too familiar to require proof. It is unfortunate that libels upon nations and religions cannot be punished, as can libels upon individuals. At any rate, it is obvious that missionaries capable of making such statements are unfitted to be teachers in India; whether by ignorance or insincerity, it may be left to them to explain.

Commoner than the simple lie described above, is the half truth or misrepresentation. Many of these relate to the position of women. Sister Nivedita says that she has heard the following thirteen statements made and supported in a single speech; each statement has a familiar ring to the student of missionary literature. They were as follows:

(1) That the Hindu social system makes a pretence of honouring women, but that this honour is more apparent than real; (2) That women in India are deliberately kept in ignorance; (3) That women in India have no place assigned to them in heaven, save through their husbands; (4) That no sacramental rite is performed over them with Vedic texts; (5) That certain absurd old misogynist verses… are representative of the attitude of Hindu men to their women-folk in general; (6) That a girl at birth gets a sorry welcome; (7) That a mother’s anxiety to bear sons is appalling; ‘her very wifehood depends on her doing so’; (8) That the infanticide of girls is a common practice in India; (9) That the Kulin Brahman marriage system is a representative fact; (10) That parents unable to marry off their daughters are in the habit of marrying them to a god (making them prostitutes) as an alternative; (11) That Hindu wedding ceremonies are unspeakably gross; (12) That the Hindu widow lives a life of such misery and insult that burning to death may well have seemed preferable; (13) That the Hindu widow is almost always immoral.

It would be waste of time to give the answers to these thirteen statements here; but I may, as Sister Nivedita does, classify them. Nos. 1, 3, 7, 11 and 13 are entirely false; Nos. 2, 5 and 12 are the result of misinterpreting or overstating facts; Nos. 4, 8, 9 and 10 may be true of certain limited localities, periods, or groups, yet are spoken of as representative of Hindu life as a whole. The last class is the most important; take only one example, No. 8; it is true that infanticide was at one time common amongst a certain class, of Rajputs; but “it is in no sense a common Indian practice, any more than, if as much as, it is a common London practice.” Indeed, in almost all these cases a terrible tu quoque can be alleged, -not to speak of vices peculiar to the Christian West.


Vulgarising Hinduism

I briefly review some other common missionary statements. The sacrifice of goats to Kali is condemned, – though they are slain at a blow. The scene is described in all its horror; the simple English audience is led to think of it as typical of heathendom; and to forget their slaughterhouses and their rabbit coursings, the ‘accidents’ that happen to the carted deer, and the young ladies of the country-house who assist at the death of carefully imported foxes, only too happy if the bloody tail is their reward for a successful chase. The mode of worship of Hindus and Buddhists is called idolatrous; whereas every missionary must know that this is in direct opposition to the statements of the Hindus and Buddhists themselves. This is not the place to enter into a discussion of the rationale of image-worship; suffice it to say that the distinction between a symbol and a fetish is, to the Protestant missionary, nil. Hindu literature is said to be gross and impure; to those who see in sex-love merely the gratification of an animal passion, this may seem to be so, for certainly, like Shakespeare and the Old Testament, Eastern literature is not fettered by the conventions of Victorian England. Bishop Caldwell has said, “The stories related of Krishna’s life do more than anything else to destroy the morals and corrupt the imagination of the Hindu youth.”: but honi soit qui mal y Pense… the stories of the child-Krishna delight the mother-heart of every Indian woman, the love of Krishna for Radha typifies to Indian men and women that ideal love which Dante felt for Beatrice, and the love of the soul of man for God; the teachings of Krishna in the Gita, are the consolation and guide in life alike of the learned and unlearned, the ‘New Testament’ of Hinduism.

Of caste, only evil is spoken, its trade-guild and eugenic aspects being altogether ignored. It is related as horrible that men are divided into groups that may not intermarry; as if the situation were not almost identical in Europe, only there the rank depends more on wealth than on descent; and as if the missionary did not himself belong to the most arrogant of Indian castes, the Anglo-Indian. How many missionaries would care to see their daughters marry an Indian of any caste?

Finally we have the misrepresentation of Hinduism itself; or of Buddhism, or Islam as the case may be. “Sometimes,” says an English writer “a faint suspicion… haunts us that Englishmen are constitutionally unable to realise the spiritual life of any other people.” It is perhaps worthwhile to briefly illustrate both the ignorance of bare facts, and the incapacity to understand unfamiliar religious experience by one or two typical quotations from missionary books. One writer says:

The fundamental error of Hinduism is to judge God by our own standard. The doctrine of Maya is pure imagination, utterly opposed to common sense… Christianity, on the other hand, affirms the reality of the universe, and the trustworthiness of our senses… Every one of our five senses… bears witness to the reality of the objects around us. To any man endowed with a grain of common sense, the opinion maintained by some of the schools that the soul is infinite, like akasa must seem the height of absurdity. Other views held are scarcely less extravagant, that it is eternal, svayambhu, self-existent. Not a single character in the Hindu pantheon, or in the pantheon of any other nation, has claimed the position of one who offered himself as a sacrifice for the benefit of humanity.

The author of ‘Holy Himalaya,’ a missionary book of the worst type, writes:
Hinduism has no system of moral teaching, with definite sanctions or adequate basis.
It would be cruel to continue making quotations, which illustrate the ‘constitutional inability to realise the spiritual life of any other people.’ Suffice it to say that those who suffer from it are not fitted to educate the Indian people, and it is questionable whether we do well to permit them to do so.

Simple Solutions

The question of our attitude towards the Christian missionary is not an academic one. His misrepresentation of India at home, and miseducation of Indians in India, do us serious injury by suggesting that it is England’s God-given mission, not only to rule, but to civilise and to convert us, and by raising up a generation of ‘educated’ Indians who are indeed strangers in their own land. What is to be our course of action in relation to these facts? The answer is fairly simple. The power of the missionary at home to misrepresent is being continually lessened with the increasing knowledge of Indian religion and Indian civilisation contrasting so markedly with the indifference of even ten years ago. The funds of missionary societies in America were considerably lessened for a time subsequent to the speeches of Swami Vivekananda at the World’s Parliament of Religions; “if that is what Hinduism means, why are we helping to destroy it? We wish to know more”, they said. Just now in America, the keenest interest is now being taken in Indian religion and philosophy, and the tables are indeed turned by the presence of Hindu missionaries in California and New York.

In respect of education, the remedy is almost altogether in our own hands. Let us cease to allow ourselves to be pauperised by sending our sons and daughters to schools supported by the contributions of those in far off lands who know nothing of us, but are quite sure that we are living in the deepest spiritual darkness. It is shameful for us to allow these worthy people to do for us, so badly, what we could (if we would) do so much better for ourselves. The subject of National Education is perhaps the most important of all before us, for it lies at the root of all other problems.

We must not rest content for a single moment until the whole of Indian educational machine, is taken out of the hands of Government and the missionaries, to be controlled by ourselves. And as at present so many of us are almost as unfitted by the existing systems of so-called education as the missionaries themselves to do this work, let us prepare ourselves for it, by studying the most important educational movements going on in the West, and especially by studying the educational systems of small and important independent nations, such as Denmark, Hungary; but above all by deeper knowledge of our own country, which contains within itself all the elements of a cult more profound and a faith more reasoned than that of any other land.

A most clear recognition of the true character of missionary activity, and a most determined resistance to its aims and methods are needed now. The author of ‘Holy Himalaya’ writes:

The true friends of India are those who would change its root ideas… the bogey of religious neutrality… will have to be laid to a considerable extent… else in the end we shall have to make the confession that we as a nation have no rational objects in India beyond commercialism and exploitation.

It has been well said that the nonconformist conscience is the greatest barrier to Indian freedom! In a recent number of the School Guardian, the editor refers to the Church Missionary Society’s school at Srinagar as follows:

1,400 boys – mostly Hindus and a large proportion of them of high caste – are being changed from superstitious, cowardly, idle, and untruthful beings into manly Christians.

As a commentary on these characteristic statements, and in illustration of the effects of the policy they reflect, the following extract is given here, from an article by Lala Har Dayal:

“The missionary is the representative of a society, a polity, a social system, a religion and a code of morality which are totally different from our own. He comes as a belligerent and attacks our time-honoured customs and institutions, our sacred literature and traditions, our historical memories and associations. He wishes to give us a new name, a new place of worship, a new set of social laws. He has declared war to the knife against everything Hindu. He hates all that we hold dear. Our religion is to him a foolish superstition: our customs are the relic of barbarism, our forefathers are to him black heathens condemned to burn in the fires of hell for ever. He wishes to destroy our society, history, and civilization. Our Shastras, Darsanas and Vedas are for him so much waste paper. He regards them as monstrous machines devised by misguided priests to prepare millions for damnation in the next world. He condemns our manners, pooh-poohs our holy love, laughs at our heroes and heroines and paints us as black as the devil to the whole civilised world. He is the great enemy of the Hindu people – the Principle of Anti-Hinduism Incarnate – the Ravana of today who hates all that we cherish, despises all that we revere, all that we are prepared to defend with our very lives…

He looks forward to the time when the Smritis shall be unknown to the descendants of present day Hindus, and the Ram Lila shall have become a meaningless word in their ears. He shall cover India with acres of burial-grounds; cremation is anathema to him. He is the arch-enemy who appears in many guises, the great foe of whatever bears the name of Hindu, the ever-watchful, ever-active, irreconcilable Destroyer of the work of the Rishis and Maha Rishis, of that marvel of moral, intellectual and civic achievement which is known as Hindu civilisation. Let us labour under no delusions on this point. You may forget your own name; you may forget your mother. But do not for a moment forget the great, all-important, outstanding fact that the missionary is the most dreaded adversary you have to meet.. the greatest enemy of dharma and Hindu national life in the present age.”

In these words there may be exaggeration – they do not apply throughout to the work of every missionary; but there is nevertheless essential truth; and it is resistance in this spirit which missionaries must expect in the future, if they persist in their mistaken aims and methods.

A time will come when Christian missions, as at present understood, will seem to Christians as wide a departure from the true spirit of Christianity as the crusades appear to us today. Meanwhile, the missionary must not be allowed to ‘educate,’ until he really understands the Indian people and desires to help them to solve their own problems in their own way; he must not be allowed to teach, until he himself has learnt.

[Ananda Kentish Coomaraswamy, one of the greatest Indian Art-Historians, was Chairman of the National Committee for India’s Freedom. Hw was also the foremost interpreter of Indian culture to the West in his day. The extracts published here are from his inspiring collection, ‘Essays in Indian Nationalism’, 1909. His book ‘Myths and Legends of the Hindus and Buddhists’, co-authoured with sister Nivedita, was reprinted recently by Advaita Ashrama, Kolkata.]