| Michel Danino: We have long heard that India’s school system, a legacy of the colonial era, needs to be radically overhauled if it is to meet the needs of a modern and largely young nation. Yet students themselves have rarely been asked for their own impressions, much less consulted on ways to improve the quality of education. To help fill this lacuna, the International Forum for India’s Heritage (IFIH) conducted an NCERT-sponsored Survey on Educationfor Standards 9-12; over 11,000 students were asked to answer 72 questions. The survey was conducted in English (66%) and seven Indian languages; students (40% of them girls) were drawn from 278 schools spread over 21 States; 85% of the students were from private schools, 81% from urban schools. The questionnaire’s first part dealt with Indian culture and values, the second part with the students’ experience of other aspects of the educational system; while some questions were of the yes/no type, most required the students to spell out their thoughts and suggestions, which provided a substantial qualitative feedback. Findings on culture in education The Survey first questioned students on aspects of Indian heritage: arts, science, festivals, traditional sports and games, literature, inspiring historical or mythical characters, yoga and spirituality. The results were striking: 91% of all students felt that they would benefit from learning elements of Indian culture. Among the aspects of Indian culture that students would like to learn, art comes first, followed by asanas and pranayama, physical games such as kabaddi, and meditation. Coming to values, only 38% of the students felt that they were acquiring some values at school, an alarmingly low proportion; 7% specifically stated they were acquiring no values at all, 11% gave intermediate replies, and 44% did not reply at all. As regards the values which students said they would most like to practise in their own lives, honesty came first followed by truthfulness, brotherhood and friendship, duty and dharma, reverence for / inspiration from one’s parents, self-perfection, courage and simplicity each, and finally non-violence. When asked which values they felt they had acquired from stimulating stories from theRamayana, Mahabharata, Panchatantra, etc., the categories and proportions were very similar, which reflects on the inspirational potential of such texts and stories when used as educational tools. In a study correlating 11 different questions and defining a five-grade scale, 83% of students showed a substantial degree of interest in Indian culture or in learning about it at school, denoting an eagerness for cultural education – undoubtedly one major finding of this Survey. Analyzing the variables, we found that Indian-language students value Indian culture (including yoga and meditation) markedly more than their English-medium counterparts. While Tamil-medium students are the most dissatisfied as regards the attention paid to Indian culture in their curriculum, students of Gujarati and Bengali mediums are those most interested in Indian culture; barring Hindi, English-medium students score the lowest. Overall, students of rural Govt. schools showed far more interest in Indian culture, followed by their counterparts from private urban schools. Students of Govt. urban schools seemed the least interested. Findings on the quality of the educational system The Survey highlighted aspects of the students’ experiences at school. •Mother tongue vs. English: 47% of the students feel that the mother-tongue medium is the best to facilitate understanding (against 24% who favour English). This feeling is especially strong in Govt. schools (63%), and among students studying in Bengali, Kannada, Tamil and Gujarati. Even among English-medium students, 40% favour the mother-tongue medium. •Competition: Even though 64% of the students find competition beneficial, 43% feel that the examination system is stressful (the figure is probably much larger in reality). •Textbooks: 62% find the load of textbooks they are made to carry to school unnecessary and excessive. •Role of parents: While the majority seem satisfied with the role of their parents in their education, 35% report being under pressure to get marks. •Physical training: 70% of the students find physical training a pleasant change, but 31% of them find it insufficient. Most schools have some physical activity once a week, but many have it once a month or even less. •Eco-awareness: About half of the students report participating in the planting of saplings or cleanup programmes, but only 26% have been taken on visits to Nature spots. 67% desire a green area in or around their school. An elaborate study of a “satisfaction” pattern, correlating 15 different questions and drawing a five-grade scale, concluded that only 42% of all students could be said to be satisfied with the quality of school education (out of which 8% were “very satisfied”). Another 28% are average, 23% are dissatisfied and 8% very dissatisfied. Moreover, students of Govt. schools, especially in urban areas, are more dissatisfied than those of private schools. Overall, Bengali-medium students rank as the least satisfied, followed by English-medium and Tamil-medium students. •Medium: English-medium students find the examination system much more stressful than do Indian-language medium students; we showed that one contributory factor for the stress is the difficulty of following studies in English. Remarks on Expression Our studies of patterns highlighted a few important points: •The proportion of blank answers to challenging questions was generally high (21% over all questions, rising to 36% over the more challenging questions), suggesting a lack of habit of original thinking or expression. We feel that this is because the school system relies largely on mechanical methods of teaching and learning, and discourages students from articulating their own thoughts. •Analyzing the more challenging questions, we found that students of Govt. rural schools are the most capable of expressing their thoughts. Private urban school students come a distant second. •In terms of medium, the same study shows that students in Tamil and Gujarati are well ahead of others, including English-medium students, in the ability to articulate their thoughts. Conclusions Our Survey has highlighted the failure of the average school curriculum to meet the cultural needs of students, regardless of the school type or medium of instruction. This confirms long-standing observations by educationists that schooling in India imparts no meaningful cultural values to the students. In particular, English-medium students come out as the least interested in Indian culture; whatever the cause, this points to a systemic failure. Value-based education has long been viewed as supremely desirable, yet the average Indian school appears as far from this goal as ever. To meet the students’ aspirations, it would be essential to: •Reduce the pressure of examinations and competition, and lighten the syllabus to make space for such disciplines. •Integrate Indian culture into the curriculum innovatively, and encourage schools to conduct extra-curricular activities of a cultural nature. •Work out ways to reward students who excel in cultural disciplines. The above can only be done if deeper reforms are envisaged. Students themselves have provided valuable suggestions for change: •Reduction of the syllabus to make room for quality. •A less mechanical pedagogy: Many students complained strongly about teaching methods that brought no stimulation to thinking. They also asked for teachers to have human qualities such as patience, understanding, and cheerfulness. •A practical-oriented pedagogy: There was a consistent demand for more practical, less bookish or theoretical learning, including audiovisual material, computers, sports and physical activities, visits to places, industries, and nature spots. •Examinations: 24% of students suggested either doing away with exams altogether, replacing them with daily evaluation, or making them more flexible in terms of subjects and timing. Exams should test the child’s real talent and understanding, not merely the capacity to memorize textbooks. Despite some limitations, this Survey has highlighted areas where school education has failed in its mission to equip a student to face life. It also shows that the still prevalent notion that education can be designed without the active participation of the students is a relic of the past. In any effort to make those twelve years of schooling a more fulfilling period in a child’s life, students should not be seen as passive recipients. The students’ voice is a genuine one and deserves to be heard. They should be accepted as active participants in their own education. Michel Danino Convener, International Forum for India’s Heritage (www.ifih.org) 80 Swarnambika Layout, Ramnagar, Coimbatore – 641 009, Tamil Nadu, India Email: micheld@sify.com, ifih@vsnl.netnet | |
| About the Author: Michel Danino is a long-time student of Indian civilization and has translated and edited books related to Sri Aurobindo and Mother. He is also the convener of the International Forum for India’s Heritage. | |
The Voice of Indian Students on School Education
Hinduism in America: Setting Our Own Terms
If you have read Aditi Bannerjee’s recent article, “The Hyphenated Hindu”, in Outlook magazine, you’ve likely concluded that Hinduism faces great peril in America. Perhaps, this is so. But for me, growing up Hindu in America, even in small, pious, Christian, Midwestern, Bible-belt America, was a privilege, not a curse. Thanks to the efforts of my parents and other Hindus in the community, we formed a Hindu school and took various trips to Gurukulams. Thanks to the open-minded curiosity of our neighbors and friends, we, unthreatened, could deepen their understanding of Hinduism, as well as our own, whenever they had any questions. Thanks to the new environment, we could choose which aspects of our great religion — and our great country — to hybridize. People trusted us to explain our religion, because they recognized that it was our lived experience. I realize that mine might be a rare, lucky story, a product of parental interest and benign social neglect. Regardless, my experience in the heart of America taught me to value both my religion and my society for the openness with which they allowed me to explore one another.
When I arrived in college, however, my environment changed. In essence, it now resembled the environment Aditi described in her article. Before, it was sufficient for me to explain that all the usual negative buzzwords in Hinduism — caste, chauvinism, and ritualism — were not part of Hinduism as it was practiced by 90% of those I knew. Now, I had to justify this observation by distancing myself from those buffoons — whom I had never met or seen — who still practiced regressive Hinduism. Before, it was sufficient for me to explain that Hinduism was a religion of tolerance; now, I had to swallow my irritation as others used a few horrible exceptions to tar Hinduism’s record. Worst, I could not simply explain key concepts of my religion to others using whatever words were handy; suddenly, labels had become all-important. Was I an Advaitist or Dvaitist? A Vaishnavite or Shaivite? A Congress “secularist” or a BJP “fundamentalist”? Because my parents had maintained neutrality (for our town’s Hindus, at least) between these often-pointless labels, they had unconsciously taught me to see the good in each. Such nuance found no home between these simple homogenizations, which took on a life of their own. Soon, I found myself divided against myself, and against my colleagues; where once my diversity was my strength, a simple act of naming had transformed it into my weakness.
The problem of labeling has a long history in India. The Vedic rishis taught us to avoid it with their characterization of God as neti, neti (not this, nor that). It was later thrust upon us in the form of a clumsy word — Hindu — which was little more than a geographic signifier. Later, it divided our various sects into different “religions” as it was manipulated to mean caste and ritualism. Later still, labeling helped to divide India between the “backward” and the “forward” and continues to create new fissures. And the problem’s scope is endless. When Westerners define religion, they often mean non-rational faith; by this label, Hinduism only occasionally qualifies. Religious scholars now try to find ways of “including” Hinduism as one of the “religions” worth study. It’s hard not to see the slur, as if the oldest contiguously surviving and flourishing spiritual/cultural system in history “needs” their classifications to prove worthy of study. A well-meaning student of religion once informed me “there is no such thing as Hinduism, only ‘Hinduisms’.” I was so conflicted that I couldn’t even protest. The warning of the rishis never seemed more apt: labelling, whether inspired by self-exorcism or scholarly creativity, has wreaked havoc.
Labels also underlie the difference between Aditi’s experience and my own. A benign environment allowed me to pick and discard my labels at will; a hostile environment forced her and other Hindus to adopt those of others. In the hostile environment, one cannot be a “devout Hindu” and yet a “believer in secularism”, despite the fundamentally pluralistic nature of Hinduism. One cannot simply hate bigotry; one must also hate the “Sangh Parivar”, and find faults even in its most humanistic goals. This self-imposed exile by moderates only leaves the Sangh in the hands of even more extreme individuals, ironically perpetuating the cycle of alienation.
And the labels are not just divisive; frequently, they are untrue. What is “true” Hinduism: what Hindus practice or what we hear of our practice from scholars of dubious integrity? How is it “secular” to engineer governmental take-over of temples? With a combination of labelling and deceit, the detractors of Hinduism have set the terms of discourse and kept alive the policy of divide-and-rule. They have so twisted the meaning of words that a former geographic signifier — Hindu — now means nothing more than caste, ritualism, and whatever else negative can be attached to it. There can be no positive new formulations as long as others control our fundamental name and its attendant implications. One need only examine the record of the Ramakrishna Mission, Sri Aurobindo Society, the Arya Samaj and Sikhism, all of which were born in the wide arena of Hinduism, and all of which eventually denied their Hindu-ness. None wants to be associated with this pariah word. In such an environment, even innocuous labels like “Hindu-American” will only serve to further deracinate the very body of Hinduism proper we are trying to save.
New labels will avail us nothing; it is the very act of labelling, especially when it is steeped in deceit, that we must challenge. For this problem of labeling to be ameliorated, we must do many things. First and foremost, we must challenge the labels. What do people mean by “Hindutva?” Do they fix a value for Hindu traditions? What do they mean by “Hindu revivalists?” Do they mean we fight to modernize our religion and make it relevant? Each question will force the labelers to explain themselves and expose the deceits implicit in many of their “guilt-by-association” strategies. Second, we must pick new labels that accurately characterize us as individuals. Most of us are pluralists; most of us are tolerant. Many are humanists. We must focus on our individual non-classifiability, as well as that of any movements we might support. The bottom line is that we should set our own agenda, not agree to pre-arranged categories that bear little resemblance to reality.
In the real world, we cannot simply do away with them, so we should ensure that we do our work by setting them ourselves. We need to challenge, overturn, and redefine them when they divide deceitfully. We must control, at the very least, the way our own positions and ideas are discussed. Otherwise, even adding new labels will be a futile exercise. Without a more aggressive approach, “Hindu-Americans”, like so many reformers before them, will soon grow ashamed of the “Hindu” their names were designed to protect.
28th January, web edition.
The article is available online at:
http://www.outlookindia.com/full.asp?fodname=20040128&fname=aditi&sid=1
Author:
Raman Khanna, hailing from Ohio and a former student of religious studies at Northwestern University in Evanston, is presently pursuing his medical studies in Chicago, Illinois (USA).
Raman Khanna
A Thematic View of Indian Civilization
| Michel Danino: On Indian History In the last few years, Indian history has been much in the news. Not, however, in an effort to make better sense of India’s past, of her behaviour as a civilization, of the specificities of Indian culture, nor also to integrate new findings into an ever-growing perspective, but mostly for polemical, political, or sensational reasons that only end up creating more confusion and driving us farther away from the central issue—how to deal with Indian history? Ideology barges in and a finer perception of India tiptoes out. In the end, we Indians are the victims, more particularly the students. As long as the teaching of history is manipulated and remote-controlled, it will stifle creativity and students will continue to look at the discipline as a chore pushed down their throats—a “sleeping pill,” as some of them once told me. Mathematics might be another, but then, you need it to get a good job—what do you need history for? That, in fact, is the whole question. Unless the syllabus, the textbook, and the teacher can together convince the student that history opens a window onto Indian culture and heritage and an understanding of ourselves—in short, a meaningful perspective of India—the answer to the question will merely be to get a few marks at the exam. If there is nothing more to it, we might as well scrap the whole discipline, as a few state governments have indeed suggested recently. India’s history is not about dates and kings and bloodsheds. It is about bringing out the life and culture of the Indian people, also the bend of the nation, the way India reacted (and continues to react) to crises and obstacles, adapted to new conditions, the way it has absorbed and given, changed but also remained the same. In a word, what makes India ‘India’? Two Views of India If we pursue this research, we will soon find that we have to deal with two diametrically opposite perspectives of India. One of them was aptly summarized by the great historian R. C. Majumdar: So far as the available evidence goes, there cannot be the slightest doubt that Indian civilization manifests itself in a way and a form very different from that with which we are familiar in the rest of the world. We have to consequently approach the history of India in a different spirit, and adopt a different scale of values in order to appraise her culture and civilization. The wars and conquests, the rise and fall of empires and nations, and the development of political ideas and institutions should not be regarded as the principal object of our study, and must be relegated to a position of secondary importance. On the other hand, more stress should be laid upon philosophy, religion, art, and letters, the development of social and moral ideas, and the general progress of those humanitarian ideals and institutions which form the distinctive feature of the spiritual life of India and her greatest contribution to the civilization of the world.[1] Rabindranath Tagore, whose view of India and Indian history is rarely highlighted, wrote a seminal essay entitled The History of Bharatavarsha. In it, he struck a chord parallel to Majumdar’s: The history of India that we read and memorize for our examinations is really a nightmarish account of India. Some people arrive from somewhere and the pandemonium is let loose. And then it is a free-for-all: assault and counter-assault, blows and bloodletting. … If Bharatavarsha is viewed with these passing frames of dreamlike scenes, smeared in red, overlaid on it, the real Bharatavarsha cannot be glimpsed. These histories do not answer the question, where were the people of India? Our real ties are with the Bharatavarsha that lies outside our textbooks. If the history of this tie for a substantially long period gets lost, our soul loses its anchorage. After all, we are no weeds or parasitical plants in India. Over many hundreds of years, it is our roots, hundreds and thousands of them, that have occupied the very heart of Bharatavarsha. But, unfortunately, we are obliged to learn a brand of history that makes our children forget this very fact. It appears as if we are nobody in India…[2] Such a conception was also that of Swami Vivekananda,[3] of Sri Aurobindo, who presented us with a comprehensive formulation of Indian civilization in his Foundations of Indian Culture,[4] of Sister Nivedita,[5] John Woodroffe,[6] Ananda Coomaraswamy,[7] K. M. Munshi,[8] and a host of other profound thinkers and scholars. On the other hand, we have what I venture to call the “colonial-Marxist” perspective. The hyphenation is justified, as we find that in India’s case, Marxist historiography accepts in practice the broad framework of the erstwhile colonial historians, even as it throws new insights, some of which (in the economic and social fields in particular) are often valuable. Among the main features of this perspective, we should certainly mention: 1. A purely materialistic, social and economic definition of man. Since no spiritual dimension is acknowledged, India’s religious and spiritual currents, movements, and evolution are interpreted purely from a materialistic standpoint. 2. Indian spirituality and religion (labelled “animism,” “idolatry”…) are therefore of no value, as are India’s great spiritual figures. To a Marxist historian, Swami Vivekananda’s or Sri Aurobindo’s or Tagore’s understanding of Indian history and civilization is of no relevance. 3. India’s cultural continuity and identity are basically denied. Artificial breaks are introduced in time (for instance the imaginary Aryan Invasion of India) or in society (the Brahmins vs. the rest of India). We do hear of India’s “DIVERSITY” but not of what constitutes its “UNITY.” India’s cultural cement, for instance the reach of epic and Puranic lore to the remotest corner of India, is not thought to be a worthwhile object of study. 4. A gross overemphasis on the caste system: Most social phenomena are interpreted in terms of caste. Yet the relative stability and economic prosperity provided by the caste system to Indian society is overlooked. Also, the substantial role of Islam and British rule in hardening the caste system is glossed over, while Hinduism is portrayed as the spread or sometimes the imposition of “Brahminism,” ignoring its organic interchange with local cultures. 5. India’s civilizational achievements and contributions to the world in terms of science, technology, philosophy, spirituality, religion, art, literature, scripts, etc., are consistently underemphasized. 6. Semitic religions and societies are gently dealt with, while the defects of Indian society are magnified and invariably put down to Hinduism. 7. India’s history is squeezed into a Eurocentric framework through an artificial and alien terminology: “barbarism,” “feudalism,” “class war”…. Failing to work out an Indian historiography of India, this perspective in effect promotes a de-Indianized view of Indian history, which can logically lead only to the atomization of India, since one is left to wonder what can hold together this bewildering medley. Themes in Indian Civilization In this paper, I propose to highlight a few key themes that naturally emerge from Indian history and archaeology. In themselves, they are by no means new, so I will not go over the “classical” evidence supporting them, which can be found in many studies.[9] I will only attempt to show how they receive fresh and sometimes crucial support from findings made in recent years. Which of the two above perspectives of India those new findings tend to endorse should be clear enough. 1. Antiquity and Continuity Antiquity and continuity are possibly the most striking characteristics of Indian civilization, and they have been amply confirmed by archaeological evidence. Among India’s most ancient settlements, Mehrgarh, an important site in Baluchistan, at the foot of the Bolan Pass, has been excavated in the last decades. Spread over 250 hectares, it has brought to light one of the earliest farming communities on the subcontinent, dating back to 7000 BC; by 6000 BC, it had “a veritable agricultural economy solidly established,”[10] in the words of French excavator Jean-François Jarrige. More importantly, Mehrgarh has revealed a continuous sequence of cultures spanning some 4,000 years and leading to the “mature” Indus-Sarasvati civilization and beyond. More such sites may yet come to light, giving us a better understanding of the growth of civilization on Indian soil. One possible candidate may emerge from the Gulf of Khambat, where in the last few years the National Institute of Ocean Technology[11] has been collecting artefacts from the sea bed, with pottery and wood pieces yielding dates between 3000 and 10,000 years old.[12] Moreover, sonar photography has revealed strangely geometric patterns along a paleo-river bed that resemble settlements. While the site does seem to hold potential, such patterns can also arise out of natural formations; we should therefore urge caution pending systematic excavations of the sea bed. Not far away, the submerged city of Dwaraka, discovered in the early 1980s, is yet to be explored systematically, even though it could hold a key to the thorny issue of the historicity of the Mahabharata. All that we can safely assert is that it dates back to 1500 BC at the least.[13] Going a little further back in time, sites of the Indus-Sarasvati civilization, the first on Indian soil (2600–1900 BC for its mature phase), have yielded many artefacts that evidence a cultural continuity with later Indian civilization, especially in the Gangetic region. For instance, ornaments (including craft techniques), games (from spinning tops to dice), traditions (red pigment at the parting of the hair), the use of conch shells for libations as well as trumpeting, the ritual use of water for purification (as seen at Mohenjo-daro’s Great Bath), religious symbols (the svastika, the trishul, the pipal, etc.), important modes of worship such as fire, mother-goddess, lingam, etc.[14] It is therefore hardly surprising to read such statements under the pens of archaeologists: John Marshall: “The [Harappan] religion is so characteristically Indian as hardly to be distinguished from still living Hinduism…. One thing that stands out both at Mohenjo-daro and Harappa is that the civilization hitherto revealed at these two places is not an incipient civilization, but one already age-old and stereotyped on Indian soil, with many millennia of human endeavour behind it…”[15] Jonathan M. Kenoyer: “Since the discovery of the Indus cities, scholars have made comparisons and contrasts between the Indus cities and later urban cultures of the subcontinent. Current studies of the transition between the two earthly urban civilizations claim that there was no significant break or hiatus.”[16] Jim Shaffer: “The previous concept of a ‘Dark Age’ in South Asian archaeology is no longer valid.”[17] Conclusions: The average history textbook greets its readers with a fragmented, confused and incoherent idea of India; they learn nothing of the unifying virtue of Indian culture, of its synthesizing (not “composite”) nature, its unparalleled continuity, least of all its spiritual foundations and its achievements. By contrast, other nations, with an often much more limited heritage than India’s, find nothing wrong in nurturing pride for it in their students. In 1918, Sri Aurobindo diagnosed the problem of Indian education thus: “The full soul rich with the inheritance of the past, the widening gains of the present, and the large potentiality of the future, can come only by a system of National Education. It cannot come by any extension or imitation of the system of the existing universities with its radically false principles, its vicious and mechanical methods, its dead-alive routine tradition and its narrow and sightless spirit”.[54] Together, the above themes offer a pedagogic alternative, in that they paint a living and inspiring, if incomplete, picture of Indian civilization. An innovative teaching of Indian history could organize its material around such “master ideas,”[55] as Sri Aurobindo called them, rather than follow a chronological line that churns out events pell-mell and without an atom of relevance to the life of today’s young Indian. This bookish approach must be done away with. Instead, an intelligent pedagogy could include, besides the above thematic approach, visits to archaeological or historical sites and museums, and even involve students in a local excavation or restoration; it could encourage the use of visual and multimedia material, good maps, etc. It should also encourage research projects based on the above or other themes, for instance the lives of a few great Indians – kings, but also scientists, saints, sages, poets, freedom fighters etc. – so as to show in what ways they have embodied the Indian genius. As a result, a student would acquire a far more concrete, often visual, contact with Indian culture and would grasp its evolution rather than a mass of scattered, unrelated and often outdated data. The gain would be enormous. No longer an isolated (and largely meaningless) individual in time and space, the student becomes part of the great stream of Indian civilization. Identity – the dreaded word of today’s scholarship – would also crystallize, but a self-confident, generous, creative identity in tune with the universe. Is it a sin to celebrate India’s symphony, while acknowledging a few false notes? The issue now facing India’s history is not some dubious “detoxification,” but nothing less than its decolonization and, in reality, its demoronization. Let us end this brief journey through Indian civilization with this profound observation of Sister Nivedita: “India, as she is, is a problem which can only be read by the light of Indian history. Only by a gradual and loving study of how she came to be, can we grow to understand what the country actually is, what the intention of her evolution, and what her sleeping potentiality may be”.[56] References & Notes: [1] The History and Culture of the Indian People (Bombay: Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan, 1951), vol. 1, p. 42. [2] Rabindranath Tagore, The History of Bharatavarsha, available online at www.ifih.org [3] Swami Vivekananda, Lectures from Colombo to Almora (Calcutta: Advaita Ashrama, 1992). [4] The Foundations of Indian Culture, vol. 14 in Sri Aurobindo Birth Centenary Library (Pondicherry: Sri Aurobindo Ashram, 1972) [5] Sister Nivedita, Footfalls in Indian History (Calcutta: Advaita Ashrama, 1990) [6] John Woodroffe, Is India Civilized? (Madras: Ganesh & Co., 1918) [7] Essays in National Idealism (1910, reprinted Munshiram Manoharlal, New Delhi, 1981); Art and Swadeshi (New Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal, 1994) [8] K. M. Munshi, Akhand Hindustan (Bombay: New Book Co., 1942); also his introduction to The History and Culture of the Indian People [9] The Cultural Heritage of India (Calcutta: The Ramakrishna Mission Institute of Culture, 1958-2001, 6 vols.), The Wonder That Was India by A. L. Basham (Calcutta: Rupa & Co., 3rd ed, 1981), A Cultural History of India, ed. A. L. Basham (New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1975-1983), India and World Civilization by D. P. Singhal (Michigan State University Press, 1969), L’Inde classique by Louis Renou and Jean Filliozat (2 vols., French) [10] Jean-François Jarrige, “De l’Euphrate à l’Indus,” Dossiers Histoire et Archéologie (Dijon, December 1987), p. 84 [11] Details and photographs: www.niot.res.in/m3/arch/index.htm [12] S. Kathiroli, S. Badrinarayanan, D. V. Rao, B. Sasisekaran and S. Ramesh, “Recent Marine Archaeological Finds in Khambat, Gujarat,” Journal of Indian Ocean Archaeology (New Delhi: Centre for Research and Training in History, Archaeology and Paleoenvironment), No. 1, 2004, pp. 141-149 [13] S. R. Rao, The Lost City of Dvaraka (New Delhi: Aditya Prakashan, 1999) [14] Jonathan Mark Kenoyer, Ancient Cities of the Indus Valley Civilization (Karachi & Islamabad: Oxford University Press & American Institute of Pakistan Studies, 1998); B. B. Lal, India 1947-1997: New Light on the Indus Civilization; The Sarasvati Flows On: The Continuity of Indian Culture (New Delhi: Aryan Books International, 1998 & 2002); Michel Danino, “The Harappan Heritage and the Aryan Problem,” Man and Environment, vol. XXVIII, No. 1, 2003, pp. 21-32 [15] John Marshall, Mohenjo-daro and the Indus Civilization (London, 1931, 3 vols.), Vol I, p. vi-viii [16] Jonathan Mark Kenoyer, op. cit., p. 180 [17] Jim G. Shaffer, “The Indus Valley, Baluchistan, and Helmand Traditions: Neolithic through Bronze Age,” in Chronologies in Old Worlds Archaeology, ed. Robert W. Ehrich (3rd ed., Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press), vol. I, p. 459 [18] Department of Ancient History, Culture and Archaeology, University of Allahabad: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/cms.dll/html/uncomp/articleshow?artid=23873 [19] Rakesh Tewari, “The origins of iron-working in India: new evidence from the Central Ganga Plain and the Eastern Vindhyas,” Antiquity, vol. 77, No. 298, December 2003, pp. 536-544 [20] Rakesh Tewari, “The Myth of Dense Forests and Human Occupation in the Ganga Plain,” Man and Environment, vol. XXIX, No. 2, 2004, p. 113 [21] Photograph in B. B. Lal, Sarasvati Flows On, op. cit. [22] Holger Wanzke, “Axis systems and orientation at Mohenjo-daro,” in Interim Reports, Reports on fieldwork carried out at Mohenjo-daro, vol. II, ed. M. Jansen & G. Urban (Aachen: Aachen University Mission, 1987); Asko Parpola, Deciphering the Indus Script (New Delhi: Cambridge University Press, 2nd ed., 2000), p. 201 [23] J. McKim Malville & Lalit M. Gujral, Ancient Cities, Sacred Skies: Cosmic Geometries and City Planning in Ancient India (New Delhi: IGNCA & Aryan Books International, 2000) [24] Baidyanath Saraswati, Lifestyle and Ecology and The Cultural Dimension of Ecology (New Delhi: IGNCA and D. K. Printworld, 1998); Bansi Lal Malla, Trees in Indian Art, Mythology and Folklore (New Delhi: Aryan Books International, 2000); Shakti M. Gupta, Plant Myths and Traditions in India (Munshiram Manoharlal, 2001); and series by C.P.R. Environmental Education Centre: The Ecological Traditions of Tamil Nadu (1997), Sacred Trees of Tamil Nadu (1998), Sacred Groves of Tamil Nadu (1998), Sacred Tanks of South India (2002), Temple Tanks of Chennai (2004); also Sanskriti Sangam: Proceedings of First International Conference & Gathering of Elders, Mumbai, 4-9 February 2003 [25] Selected studies on early Indian science: D. M. Bose, S. N. Sen & B. V. Subbarayappa, A Concise History of Science in India (New Delhi: Indian National Science Academy, 1989); Debiprasad Chattopadhyaya, History of Science and Technology in Ancient India (Calcutta: Firma KLM, 3 vols., 1986, 1991, 1996); History of Indian Science, Technology and Culture AD 1000-1800, vol. III, part 1 (New Delhi: Project of History of Indian Science, Philosophy and Culture & Oxford University Press, 1998); A. K. Bag, History of Technology in India (New Delhi: Indian National Science Academy, 1997); S. Balachandra Rao, Indian Mathematics and Astronomy – Some Landmarks (Bangalore: Jnana Deep Publications, 1998); N. Gopalakrishnan, Indian Scientific Heritage (Thiruvananthapuram: Indian Institute of Scientific Heritage, 2000); Dharampal, Indian Science and Technology in the Eighteenth Century (Hyderabad: Academy of Gandhian Studies, 1971); Indian Science Through the Ages, ed. M. Lakshmi Kumari, parts 1 & 2 (Madras: Vivekananda Kendra Patrika, 1983); George Gheverghese Joseph, The Crest of the Peacock (London: Penguin Books, 2000); S. Parameswaran, The Golden Age of Indian Mathematics (Kerala: Swadeshi Science Movement, 1998); T. S. Bhanu Murthy, A Modern Introduction on Ancient Indian Mathematics (New Delhi: Wiley Eastern Ltd., 1992); T. A. Sarasvati Amma, Geometry in Ancient and Medieval India (New Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, 1999); T. R. N. Rao & Subhash Kak, eds., Computing Science in Ancient India (Louisiana: Center for Advanced Computer Studies, 1998); S. N. Sen & K. S. Shukla, eds., History of Astronomy in India (New Delhi: Indian National Science Academy); S. Balachandra Rao, Indian Astronomy – An Introduction (Hyderabad: Universities Press, 2000); Acharya Praffullachandra Ray, A History of Hindu Chemistry (Kolkata: Shaibya Prakashan Bibhag, centenary edition 2002); B. V. Subbarayappa, ed., Chemistry and Chemical Techniques in India, vol. IV, part 1 (New Delhi: Project of History of Indian Science, Philosophy and Culture, & Centre for Studies in Civilizations, 1999); School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of St. Andrews, Scotland, Internet resource: http://www-history.mcs.st-andrews.ac.uk/history/Indexes/Indians.html [26] K. V. Sarma, ed., Science Texts in Sanskrit in the Manuscripts Repositories of Kerala and Tamil Nadu (New Delhi: Rashtriya Sanskrit Sansthan, 2002), p. 16 [27] D. T. Emerson, The Work of Jagadis Chandra Bose: 100 Years of MM-Wave Research, www.tuc.nrao.edu/~demerson/bose/bose.html; also http://earlyradiohistory.us/1897tele.htm and www.qsl.net/vu2msy/JCBOSE.htm [28] Probir K. Bondyopadhyay, “Sir J. C. Bose’s Diode Detector Received Marconi’s First Transatlantic Wireless Signal of December 1901 (The ‘Italian Navy Coherer’ Scandal Revisited),” Proceedings of The IEEE, Vol. 86, No. 1, January 1998, pp. 259-285 [29] B. B. Lal, The Earliest Civilization of South Asia (New Delhi: Aryan Books International, 1997), p. 236 [30] Jonathan Mark Kenoyer, “Early City-States in South Asia: Comparing the Harappan Phase and Early Historic Period,” in The Archaeology of Early City-States: Cross-Cultural Approaches, eds. D. L. Nichols and T. H. Charlton (Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press), pp. 51-70 [31] Steve Muhlberger, “Democracy in Ancient India,” www.unipissing.ca/department/history/histdem/ [32] The Foundations of Indian Culture, op. cit., p. 329 [33] Sri Aurobindo, On Himself, vol. 26 in Sri Aurobindo Birth Centenary Library (Pondicherry: Sri Aurobindo Ashram, 1972), p. 410 [34] Rabindranath Tagore, The History of Bharatavarsha, available online at www.ifih.org [35] Tagore, “Nationalism in India” (republished New Delhi: Macmillan, 1999), p. 69 [36] M. N. Srinivas, The Cohesive Role of Sanskritization and Other Essays (New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1989) [37] The Vivekananda Kendra Institute of Culture, Guwahati [38] Mahabharata in the Tribal and Folk Traditions of India, ed. K. S. Singh (Shimla: Indian Institute of Advanced Study, 1993); Rama-Katha in Tribal and Folk Traditions of India, eds. K. S. Singh & Birendranath Datta (Calcutta: Seagull Books, 1993); Painted Words: an Anthology of Tribal Literature, ed. G. N. Devy (New Delhi: Penguin Books, 2002), chapter “Myth” [39] Sandhya Jain, Adi Deo Arya Devata: a Panoramic View of Tribal-Hindu Cultural Interface (Delhi: Rupa, 2004) [40] Jyotindra Jain, “Propitiation of Babo Ind: Survival of the Ancient Cult of India,” in Living Traditions: Studies in the Ethnoarchaeology of South Asia, ed. Bridget Allchin (New Delhi: Oxford & IBH, 1994), p. 13 ff [41] A. V. Balasubramanian, “Social Organisation of Knowledge in India: Folk and Classical Traditions,” paper presented at Indian Institute of Advanced Study, Shimla, 27-29 September, 2003 [42] C. Rajendran, “Folk Elements in Kerala’s Sanskrit Theatre,” in Living Traditions of Natyashastra, ed. C. Rajendran (Delhi: New Bharatiya Book Corporation, 2002), p. 117 ff [43] Los Angeles Times, June 12, 2002; John Noble Wilford, New York Times, July 9, 2002 [44] Man and Environment, vol. XXVII No. 1, 2002; Journal of Indian Ocean Archaeology, No. 1, 2004 [45] Peter Berresford Ellis, The Druids (London: Constable, 1995), p. 24 [46] Ian Pearce, website: http://www-history.mcs.st-andrews.ac.uk/history/Projects/Pearce/index.html [47] George Gheverghese Joseph, The Crest of the Peacock (London: Penguin Books, 2000) [48] K. Chandra Hari, “Genesis of Calculus” [49] Michel Danino, “India’s Impact on French Thought and Literature” (unpublished) [50] Swami Vivekananda, Complete Works (Vol. V, 5th Edition, 1947), p. 77; also Hinduism Today, May-June 2001, and Toby Grotz, www.hinduism.fsnet.co.uk [51] Subhash Kak, The Wishing Tree: The Presence and Promise of India (New Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal, 2001), pp. 5-8 [52] C. P. Girija Vallabhan, “Indian Influence in the Development of Quantum Mechanics,” www.photonics.cusat.edu/article2.html [53] Fritjof Capra, Uncommon Wisdom, pp. 42-43, quoted at www.vedanta-newyork.org/articles/gita_13_15.htm [54] Sri Aurobindo, “National Education,” New India, April 8, 1918; Sri Aurobindo Birth Centenary Library, 1972, 27.505 [55] Sri Aurobindo, The Foundations of Indian Culture, Sri Aurobindo Birth Centenary Library, 1972, vols. 14 & 26 [56] Sister Nivedita, Footfalls in Indian History (Calcutta: Advaita Ashrama, 1990), p. 6 About the Author: Michel Danino is a long-time student of Indian civilization and has also translated and edited books related to Sri Aurobindo and Mother. He is also the convener of the International Forum for India’s Heritage. Email: micheld@sify.com |
The Transmission of Scientific Knowledge from Tamizhagam to Europe
K. V. Ramakrishna Rao
Introduction:
About the transmission of mathematical and astronomical Science from South India, particularly from Kerala, studies have been already conducted and published by C. K. Raju, George Ghevergheese Joseph, Denis F. Almeida, and the Aryabhata Group of University of Exeter1. Though, Prof. D. S. V. Subba Reddy2 has pointed out the European interest and their books on Indian medicine, he stopped short with appreciating interest shown by them. However, about the transmission of scientific knowledge and/or manuscripts from Tamizhagam, it appears no study has been so far. The study of Jesuit writings reveal interesting details that such transmission had taken place during 1600 to 1850 period and even beyond. The study of events at Tranquebar, Pondicherry and Madurai provides wealth of such information.
Many times, the masquerade of the Jesuits has to be removed to find out their scientific pursuits (piercing the corporate veil to understand a company). The author has already presented and published some papers about Saltpetre3, the scientific pursuits of Robert de Nobili4 and Le de Gentil5, the interest of European Scientists in India6, etc. That even the British adopted such methods under the guise of scientific survey is interesting to study their motive7. The cross-reference of Tamil Siddha books correlates corroborate and gives ample evidence for such transmission taking place. The Tamil Siddha works – a compilation popularly known as “Periya Gnanak Kovai” and as well as individual works have been consulted8 for this purpose.
South India up to 18th Century:
From 10th century onwards (with due respect to the Pallavas), South India excelled in scientific and technological activities. Indian shipping, astronomy, chemical, textiles and food processing, architecture and other fields attained status. They in turn encouraged other industries and businesses. The Indian traders and businessmen had been common in many countries. The Cholas were reigning supreme during 10th to 14th centuries. During Vijayanagara period (14th to 16th centuries), everything was at peak followed by the Nayaks. The visiting Europeans (including Jesuits)9 were stunned at multi-storied buildings, gardens, dams and water reservoirs, the shipping activities, metal technology and above all, the time bound activities of the people. They could not understand the time reckoning methods of Indians, as the Europeans were struggling with corresponding activities involving calendar, longitude problem, compass and time reckoning. Here come the Jesuits and missionaries, their colleagues and contemporaries.
Europe during the material period:
During the same period, the European countries were faced with all problems, frequent wars, famines, diseases and above all religious fanaticism interfering with every walk of life. The imports from India and East Indies were as follows:
| Year | Percentage |
| 1588 | 14% |
| 1621 | 48% |
| 1669 | 70% |
The so-called revolutions took place changing the face of Europe -The American Revolution (1776-1783), the French Revolution (1789-1791), and the Industrial Revolution (1750-1850). Within hundred years, surprisingly, Europe began to discovering and inventing everything all of sudden, when they were plaguing with diseases, reeling under religious persecution and suffering from economic conditions. Definitely, the European companies and the Jesuits gained much from India. As the ships had to sail around India from west to eastern parts, the coastal areas became strategic and hence, the European companies were fighting with each others for domination. The oppressed and suppressed scientists got wisdom through Indian books. The Protestant England and Germany, thus opposed Catholic Portuguese and French. In any case, they were united in India as far as opposing heathen Hindus in all aspects.
The Prelude to the Scientific Quest of Europeans in India:
Portuguese Physician Garcia d’Orta (1501-1568), Finnish Botanist L’Ecluse, Christovas da Casta, Dutch scholar Henrick Adrian Van Reede (1637-1691), Johann Ernest Grundler (1677-1720), Charles Clusius, Linchoten (16th century), Poludanus (explaining the writing of Linchoten) and others had studied Siddha medicine and sent voluminous palm-leaf books to Europe. Rheede when landed in Kerala was surprised to witness a great botanical garden there. In India, such gardens have been part of temples (Nanda Vanam) and Hospitals (Muligaip Pannai). Interestingly, in his case, the modus operandi found is that he got written statements from the Indian doctors to that effect that as per the directions of him, they provided the medical data, information, books, samples and formulations. Three statements are reproduced below10:
“On the tenth of the black fortnight of Chaitra month and Rakshasa year of Salivahana saka 1597, on a camp at Cochin, we Rangabhatta, Vinayak Pandit and Appu Bhatta (Eye Physician) write the following testimony of truth so that no one should treat this as false.
On a message from Adrikin Fondre, Commander of Cochin, we collected herbs, flowers, fruits which are used for medicine from this Malabar Desha through a person who was paid for it and who was specialized in discriminating medicinal plants.
This material was collected in the various seasons when they are grown. Then on, all the herbs, fruits, flowers etc., were painted. Later on we testified and tallied this material with the descriptions in the Materia Medica which we had brought along with us.
We then described these herbs, their effects etc., of which we had experimental knowledge. For the last two years both in mornings and evenings we are doing this. Whatever is written over here should not be treated as false hence we are attesting our signatures below”.
Ranga Bhatta
Vinayak Pandit
Apu Dev
Written and signed in Marathi
“By the order of Commander Hendrik Van Rheede, I, a Malabar Physician of the Ezhava caste, born in Kollad house at Kadakkarapally in Karapuram village came to the Cochin Fort and dictated as already agreed, the details of the trees, shrubs, creepers and grasses in Kerala providing with diagrams, and the medicinal treatment with them, from the practical experiences as well as the erudition from our precious old books, to Manuel Carner, the official translator of the Company, so as to record them in books, after clearing the doubts, in such manner that no learned men of this field in Kerala could find fault with it and for this it is written in Cochin Fort on 20th April, 1675”.
Kollattuvaidyan
Written and signed in Kolaluthu script of Malayalam
“By the order of the Commamner Henrika Van Rheede, I Manuel Carner, born, married and put up in Cochin, working as the official translator of the Company at Cochin Fort, wrote down in books in Malayalam and Portuguese languages separately, the details, virtues and uses of (medicinal) trees, shrubs, creepers and grasses in Kerala and their flowers, fruits, seeds, roots and essences etc, being dictated by a Malabar Physician, Kolladan, belonging to Ezhava caste, born in Karapuram village, according to my previous agreement.
Thus the work is completed after clearing all doubts and mistakes and for this agreement my signature in this writings in Cochin Fort on the day, the 19th April, 1675″.
Manuel Carner
Written and signed in Grantha Lipi of Malayalam
Thus, the statements (which are amply self-explanatory in all aspects) have been direct evidence as to how the European doctors acquired Hindu medicine directly, rather extracted. The same modus operandi must have been followed by all other doctors, engineers, chemists, etc., of all categories either Jesuits or Protestants. At least, their letter correspondence exposes such transaction taken place, shown in the context below.
1. Tranquebar – The Fortified Scientific Research Centre for Europeans:
The account of foreigners on Tranquebar differs in many aspects, as they evidently want to suppress many facts. Even the recently brought out books have been reflecting same trend11. They only delve on the religious, theological and church planting and growth activities giving statistical details,12 keeping silence on the scientific pursuits undertaken by the Jesuits or the visit of scientists, doctors, botanists, surgeons, chemists, engineers, astronomers etc, to India, and in particular to Tranquebar, Pondicherry and Madurai. There the Europeans worked together in getting all data and information of Indian arts and sciences. The medical doctors and surgeons reportedly mentioned as “taking special interest in botany”, worked under or with “famous Botanist Linnaeus” and so on. The activities of these “Botanist-Doctors” and “Jesuit-Botanists” are interesting for study, as they also formed a society “The United Brothers”. They are discussed as follows leaving the details of much-popular-missionary activities:
• Parthalomius Ziegenbalg (1683-1719): Ziegenbalg was the first Danish to start collect such data and information on Indian arts and sciences, which includes original palm-leaf books and his writings. List of herbs, aromatic plants, etc., including Plant Lexicon had been favorite collection. In one of his writings, he describes 32 types of musical instruments sitting in Tranquebar learning Tamil. When he went to Europe in 1715, he took many of his collections to the envy of the company directors. After marrying, he went to England, met King George I and appraised his activities. However, the Directors of the mission accused him of marrying, spending too much money and staying in place for long. After his death, many palm-leaf books were taken to Halle-foundation13. They include the following:
i. Books on astronomy and astrology – One book numbered TAM 79, 123 reportedly containing nine planets, twelve zodiacs and twenty seven star families.
ii. A book of Anatomy (not listed in the on-line catalogue of Danish Halle Mission).
iii. Many books on Siddha medicines, classification of herbs / plants, samples etc. (not listed).
iv. Though, Sivavakkiyar had been famous in his theological writings, none of his works listed.
v. Many books – Atticcudi, Kondrai Vendan, Nidhi nul, etc., of Avvaiyar.
vi. Books authored by Pillaip Perumal Iyengar, Pattinattup Pillaiyar, Guru Namaccivayar, Ulaganatha Pandithar, Honganer (may be Konganar), Ganapathy Pandithar.
vii. Of course, there are polemic works between Catholics and Protestants like Veda Vilakkam, and many tracts issued by one group against the other.
He must have procured these works through his Hindu contacts there like Vairaventa Guru, Pancaccara Guru, Mapillai Guru, Sena Sastri, Minakshi Sastri, Citampara Sastri and Mokampara Sastri. Other close associates were 70 years old Tamil teacher (name not mentioned), Alappan / Azhagappan (the Company Dubash), Ganpathy Upadhyata (1670-1710), his father – a Pandit (name not mentioned), Arumugam / Aaron etc. Thus, the Danish had created a gang of contacts for the purpose.
• Heinrich Plutschau (c.1678-1747): He went to Denmark along with Zeigenbalg in 1710, but did not return. He took all of his collections at that time. That his explicit religious interests had even gone to the extent of threatening Johan Sigismund Hassius (1664-1729), the Governor of Tranquebar. Danish Governor proves the crucial role played. That he was not returned from Denmark in 1716 along with Ziegenbalg is intriguing. When Hassius jailed Ziegenbalg, he was running the show at Tranquebar. Perhaps, he accompanied Ziegenbalg as a watchdog.
• John Fryer (c.1650-1733): As a skilful and experienced artist, he came to India and Iran to conduct research on Indian medicine and as well as a sort of scientific espionage from 1673 to 1681. Directed by the EIC, he collected Indian medicinal plants, herbs, seeds etc., and returned to England in 1682. He obtained a MD in 1683 from Cambridge and was elected to the Royal Society in 1697 and remained there till 1707. In his correspondence, he records that a Dr. NG (from India) sent an account of the manufacture of ghee (clarified butter) to the Royal Society (Elgod 1951: 397).
• Samuel Brown: Directed by the EIC, he collected Indian medicinal plants, herbs, seeds etc., to England. He was having correspondence with James Petiver. The work, “An account of some Indian plants etc. with their names, descriptions and virtues“; communicated in a letter from Mr. James Petiver…to Mr. Samuel Brown, surgeon at Fort St. George, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, London, 1698 proves the fact.
• James Petiver (1663-1718): Though, he was a London apothecary (a historical name for a medical practitioner who formulates and dispenses materia medica to physicians, surgeons and patients), it is surprising that he should work in collecting botanical samples, specimens, seeds and much other material from correspondents in the American and British colonies from India. He was a Fellow of the Royal Society as well as London’s informal Temple Coffee House Botany Club, famous for his study of botany and entomology. Petiver received many samples plants from the India-sojourned physicians, doctors and missionaries, and his collection formed for the Royal Society14.
• Samuel Benjamin Cnoll (1705-1767): A medical doctor educated in Halle and employed in Royal Danish Mission, Tranquebar from about 1732 until his death in 1767. He supervised the hospital from the 1740s, and in 1753, published an article on the Indian preparation of Borax in the Danish Journal15 Acta Medica Hafniensis. He served for 35 years contacting many Siddha doctors, collecting their works, gathering samples and creating a Botanical garden there, which was used by his successors for further research.
• “The United Brothers” (1768-1848): It was formed mainly to study Indian Siddha medicine system, collect samples and formulations. The members include Heyne, Klien, Rottler, Fleming, Anderson, Berry, John, Roxburgh, Buchanan (later Buchnan-Hamilton), William Jones etc. The members collected such items and sent them to Botanists of established reputation in Europe16. Many plants of Indian origins came thus be described by Retz, Roth, Schrader, Wildenow, Vahl and Smith. The French at Pondicherry also did not lag behind. Sonnerset and other Botanists from Pondicherry sent large collections of plants to Paris, and these were followed by the collections of Leschenhault and they were studied by Lamarck and Poiret. In 1788, the Tranquebar Society was formed just like the British Asiatic Society in Calcutta. It had members of naturalists, orientalists, linguists and historians from the Danish colonies and the mother country, including missionaries.
• Johan Gerhard Koenig (1728-1785): He succeeded Cnoll. Ralph records that modern Botany first gained a foothold in India through him, at Tranquebar. Though he was a missionary surgeon, he studied botany under famous Swedish botanist Carl Linnaeus (1707-78). T. L. S. Folly served under him in Copenhagen. As Koenig had other interests, he started working for the Nawab of Arcot also. He started his “medical voyage” to “discover” different disease-curing plants and herbs with the help of Indian doctors covering the areas from “the mountains north to Madras and to Ceylon” and published his findings in a Danish Scientific Journal17. In 1778, he was transferred to EIC undertaking several scientific journeys and working with notable scientists like William Roxburgh till his death in 1785. Thus, he worked for 17 years.
• Christoph Samuel John (1747-1813): He was a missionary succeeding Koenig in 1771 and continued his work with inspiration. As had been instructed by Koenig suitably about his activities, he immediately, started his work of collection of samples, preservation, packing and forwarding to William Roxburgh. Interestingly, he provides economical uses of Indian derivatives and extracts of Bassia Butyracea (Polyandria Monogynia), Bassia longifolia (Illeepei oil) etc., as been recorded by Roxburgh18. He took special interest in Indian fish. Employing Indian professional painters, he collected many figures, samples in jars and books, to Prof. Marcus Eliezer Bloch at Berlin19. Based on the data and information received from India, he published 12 volumes on the natural history of fish. He also helped another Prof. Jogann Reicnhold Forster at Halle20, who was interested in snakes, snake bites and antidotes prescribed by Brahmins. Based on the questionnaire sent by Forster, John sent back in 1792 with full details and samples. While he was discussing with Brahmins, he came to know about “Palakarai prediction” and accompanied cakras with mathematical tables used for such prediction. So he started collecting different types of cowries/shells with figures and books. Working for 42 yeas, he died in 1813 in Tranquebar.
• Johan Peter Rottler (1749-1836): He was another missionary to arrive at Tranquebar colony in 1776. His interest in botany had been so vigorous that he made “botanical excursion” around the “Tranquebar countryside and as far away as Ceylon” to collect Indian Medicinal books, formulations, drugs and medicines. He published descriptions of new species in European journals, verified the names of plants collected by two other members of the mission – Johann Klien and Benjamin Heyne. He served in Tranquebar till 1803 and then moved to Madras working for Madras Mission and died in 1836. Thus, he worked for 60 years in Tamizhagam, collected more than 2000 plants and sent them to Europe21. All the three – John, Klein and Rottler got Doctorates for their field work.
• Gottfried Klein (1766-1818): Interestingly, he was born in Tranquebar itself. However, he went to Europe for studies and returned to Tranquebar as a doctor in 1791. He got the medical title in 1795 by submitting a dissertation concerning ‘The Treatment of Venereal Disease by Indian Doctors‘. Thus, between 1791 and 1795, he must have done research on the subject matter. As his date of leaving India is not found in the records (by the author), he must have observed such cases, where Indian doctors cured the affected. He would have met Indian doctors, discussed and tried to get information from them. As the Indian doctors did not reveal the details, he must have started preparing medicines with herbs. Thus, staying at Tranquebar, he wandered covering many places and collecting many samples of plants, herbs and seeds to find out their medicinal value. That his samples reached Royal Asiatic Society immediately and Dr. William Roxburgh could write an article in Asiatic Researches22 proves the way in which they worked meticulously. Thus, he was born, worked and died in Tranquebar.
• Benjamin Heyne (1770-1819): After arriving Tranquebar in 1792, he worked with the Moravian brothers in charge of the pepper and cinnamon plantations in 1793 and then in Samalcottah23. As he could not meet his both ends, John recommended his best friend William Roxburgh to employ Heyne in EIC. In 1794, he acted as EIC’s botanist in the absence of Roxburgh at Madras. In 1799, he was appointed as an Assistant surgeon in the Madras Medical Establishment. Hayne became the EIC’s Naturalist and Botanist in the Madras Presidency in 1802. He went to Europe in 1812 via Sumatra with his collection. Returning to Madras in 1815, he started his work as a member of the Linnean Society and Gesellschaft Naturforschener Freunde Berlin. He employed Indian collectors and draughtsmen.
• Nathaniel Wallich (1786-1854): He was the best known Danish scientist to come to India, but he worked in Calcutta with EIC. He became the Superintendent of the Oriental Museum of the Asiatic Society, and later that of EIC’s Botanical Garden both at Calcutta. He prepared a catalogue for Botanical specimens to the extent of 20,000 classifying them24.
• Theodor Ludvig Frederich Folly25 (c.1740-1803): He came to Tranquebar to study Siddha medicine and its intricacies. He was commenting on the works of William Roxburgh.
T. L. F. Folly’s Interaction with Indian Doctors:
Folly also appeared to have played double-game in interacting with Indian doctors. He considered Indian Malabar / Tamil doctors as:
- ¨ Highly Superstitious imbibed with religious doctrines.
- ¨ Quacks, fake-doctors or not at all doctors.
- ¨ Had little knowledge of Medicine
- ¨ Knew no surgery
If that was the case, it is not known as to why he was so eager to find out their precise textual sources for their metallic drugs, possibly in order to find a better treatment for venereal diseases (particularly syphilis). In spite of such an opinion, a recent researcher says that he was always in search of their medical books.
Folly’s Enquiry into Siddha and Siddha Medicines:
The discussion, he had with Indian doctors is based on his note dated May 12, 1799. The two doctors came to him were father and son. Two Malabar Doctors were there to translate. Thus, it is evident that the meeting was arranged as per the requirement of Folly’s research. The discussion reveals the following facts:
•§ The Malabar-doctors (Doctors of Tamizhagam) were using mercury extensively for their preparations and it was coming from Madurai, Ramanadhapuram and other places in the interior of the country.
•§ First, he enquired about the mercury preparations.
•§ They explained the preparation of such a medicine in the form of pills which could be used for treating all venereal diseases.
•§ When he asked about the symptoms while taking such preparation, they explained that there might be wound formation in the patients’ mouth, but still he should take pills for 7 days and then stop.
•§ To cure the mouth sore, they explained that the mouth would be washed with boiled milk and malva leaves (mallow, Tutti). A preparation of Sulphur dissolved in mother’s milk could be also used. Only Kanchi would be given for diet. Purging was done in between, if necessary. The time taken for cure ranged between 12 to 15 days.
•§ When asked, if the patient still had sores on the sexual organs or other places, what should be done, they replied that the case referred to must be of “great venereal disease”, and then the pills should be continued for 15 more days. Now, the pills would be ground with Radix China (Parangippattai) and given as per the prescription.
•§ When asked for what were the other diseases which could be cured with mercury preparations, they gave the details.
•§ When enquired about the source of procurement of mercury, they replied that earlier they bought from the Dutch in Nagapatnam, after their departure, they got from Madras. They revealed that the Whites increased the price. Mercury was also obtained from Cinnabar (Jatilingam).
•§ When asked how the mercury was burned / calcinated, they replied that they learned the method from their ancestors.
•§ When he tried to suggest as to whether they learned the art from the Whites, particularly, the priests (implying white-men posing and roaming as Hindu Sanyasis) from whom they purchased mercury, they replied that they knew only their Gurus living in the mountains southwest. There were “Nine Masters” from whom they got the medicinal sciences, pharmacopeias etc.,
•§ When he wanted to buy their medicine, they refused as they could give only on seeing the patients. Persisting, he got some. He listed them as follows:
•o Boils and sores.
•o Stomach ache.
•o Diarrhoea.
•o Sweet pits (diabetes)
•o Drippers (Gonorrhea).
•o White flow (Syphilis)
•o And other diseases.
Procurement of Medical books:
He then describes about the process of mercury sublimation from the book of Tamil doctor Agastya obtained from the elder Tamil doctor. Folly confessed that he obtained the book and the process by giving one pound of purified mercury. He also promised to give more mercury, if they could get two books written by the “Nine Gurus”. The Indian doctors promised that they would come next year (1780) and give.
Following this, the note given by the author is interesting and it is reproduced2: “In all probability the mercury was brought to the Indians by the Europeans, and the formers learned its preparations from the latter. It is well-known that the Portuguese, Spanish and French, for more than 200 years have sent out missionaries, especially Jesuits. The skills of Jesuits in all sciences are well-known, and they have been around the entire country. In all parts of Indostan, especially on this peninsula, there have been monasteries, churches and missionaries. For the time being, they are expelled from the country by the Indian Princes, and in 1780-81, Hyder Ali has had all their churches, schools etc., in this country demolished, and expelled all Catholics clergymen. There are still plenty of them, where the Europeans have power”.
Then he goes on telling that there were pharmaceutical factories of the Jesuits in Goa and a Jesuit college in Pondicherry and the old monks there sent “compounded medical remedies all over the country, and of these their Drogue Amere, Elexir Ameres, Theriac, Eau de Melig, Syrup Capilar are still held in very high esteem by the residents of this country”.
Thus, the following facts are evident –
•§ Indian Doctors (e.g, Bogar) were going to China or Chinese merchants (during Chola period) coming to India for dealing with mercury. Understanding the fact, through Matteo Ricci and others, the European Companies decided to deal in mercury through the planted Jesuits.
•§ Realizing the scarcity and demand for mercury, the Europeans tried to exploit the Indian doctors directly and indirectly. That they increased the price and tempted with mercury is recorded in the Jolly’s note.
•§ As the Dutch had gunpowder factory at Pulicat, manufactured explosives and exported to Europe getting huge profits, it is evident that the Portuguese and the French also manufactured and exported these medicines to Europe exploiting the prevailing situation there.
•§ Previously, there was free movement of the doctors, scholars, students, traders etc., but after the advent of Mohammedanism, the rivalry between the Christians and them resulted in their restricted movement through north-west of India. Even after 16th century, the blockade continued through piracy carried on by both.
•§ The European doctors were desperately getting the Indian science, technology, medicine and other books. Of course, the Jesuits helped them, which they mentioned as follows (Jesuit policy as mentioned by Goncalco Fernandez Trancosco27):
Theft: So they must have robbed, stolen, burgled and committed larceny to get books
Confiscation: This could be possible, where the Europeans had their factories or churches, where they took the books by force, elimination and threatening the scholars, doctors.
Purchase: As Hindus did not sell books, “purchase” may not arise. However, as the Europeans started corrupting some of them, say by giving “one pound mercury to get a book of Agastya”, some Indians might have started selling the books.
“The Jesuit policy of Theft, Confiscation and Purchase” of Indian Books is repeated in the context of Mackenzie as “Beg, buy or borrow” as follows28: “The most impressive orientalist explorations were collaborative, unofficial and voluntary. Among these, none matched the enormous privately funded venture by Colonel Colin Mackenzie. His teams of Maratha Brahmin scholars begged, bought or borrowed, and copied, from village heads, virtually every manuscript of value they could finally acquired. Collections so acquired, reflecting the civilization of South India, manuscripts in every language, became a lasting legacy – something still being explored”
•§ In spite of the scholarship, professionalism and medical acumen, that the Europeans could act as Christians only, as revealed through the prejudice and biased thinking of Folly is interesting.
•§ Again, as his “Remark” is very revealing, it is reproduced29: “I must confess that what I have written about the separation of mercury, etc., by the Malabar might seem wrong to the learned people. However, I must be excused for my lack of understanding the language, and especially for the discretion of the Malabar doctors who never tell the truth. If one asks them about the composition of some medicament, they believe they will loose their income if they tell the truth. Therefore, they usually leave out one or two of the ingredients. My remarks about the two traveling doctors from Ramanathapuram, namely what they said about the nine great masters in the south, might possibly be true, since there has been a university for astronomy in Madurai. Furthermore, in Bengal, a province belonging to the English, there is a city called Kasi, where an Indian university still remains. The English government gives the entire income of this province, which amounts to twenty thousand rupees a year, to this university. From this university all their astronomical observations are sent out over all India and their calculations of solar eclipses are said to very precise. Their knowledge of medicine is the best in India and they are especially experienced in diseases of the eye, and even if their medicine is strong it often has a good effect. In the area of surgery they are said to have limited knowledge, but I hope soon to be able to report more fully on this”.
Again, this note reveals the following interesting details:
•§ He had accepted his poor knowledge of understanding the Indian Doctors.
•§ That the European doctors continued to, “ask them about the composition of some medicament, they believe they will loose their income if the tell the truth. Therefore, they usually leave out one or two of the ingredients”, proves their motive.
•§ There is nothing wrong, if the Indian doctors had hidden their formulations from the European doctors, as the latter had not been sincere in their dealings.
•§ They had not been honest enough to record their sources in their writings, encyclopedias etc.
•§ Even after knowing also, the western / European writers continue to write that the Hindu scholars, doctors, professionals, metallurgists etc., were “heathens”, “gentiles”, “followers of diabolic religion”, “the practices of gentility” etc., show their imbibed fundamentalism and hatred towards Hindus / Indians.
•§ That “since there has been a University for Astronomy in Madurai”, proves –
- ¨ That there was an astronomy university in Madurai.
- ¨ Perhaps, it was about to be or subjected to destruction or destroyed recently, as while mentioning about Kasi university, it is mentioned in the immediate next sentence, “Furthermore, in Bengal, a province belonging to the English, there is a city called Kasi, where an Indian university still remains.”
- ¨ Roberto de Nobili might have occupied, taken over or converted into his Ashram. As he could roam as “Romapuri Brahmin”, producing the “lost Yajur Veda” and “preaching wisdom among the wise”, he could be capable of doing that also.
- ¨ His references to calculations of solar eclipses, eye-diseases, surgery of Indians prove that he knew them already.
•§ Above all the Europeans of all sorts were working together as far as the study of Indian arts and sciences is concerned.
Inter-Medical Dialogue for Syphilis-Cure:
The entire dialogue has thus been revolved around the cure for syphilis. Folly was asking full details about the cure-pills made of mercury preparations, the dosage, the method of administration in a phased manner, and the precautions to be taken in between as the mercuric preparations had been harmful. It is evident that he forced the Hindu doctors to give out all details, but they refused informing that without seeing the patient, they would not give medicine. As a doctor, he should have treated Hindu doctors at par respecting their professionalism. But, he had approached them with preconceived ideas that they were quacks and so on. No doctor would give away all his valuable medicinal preparations, just like that. Had his medical methodology been supreme, he could have proceeded with their science, instead of getting medicine and medical knowledge from India. In fact, his “Remark” exposes his attitude. If the European doctors were proud of their knowledge, Hindu doctors could have also felt proud of their tradition, heritage and ethical practices. It is not inter-religious dialogue of “their own style” to talk with somebody and record in their writings that he had conducted 100 dialogues with heathens criticizing their diabolic methods or 200 conferences to debate male-female nature of Godhood or 300 workshops to disparage the scriptures, creation of universe, birth of Gods and Goddesses etc. Therefore, the Ramanathapuram doctors had definitely taught a good lesson to the Danish Surgeon, which has been revealed in his “Remark”. That is why, perhaps, it is not appearing in the “official manuscript” but in the “original manuscript”.
The Mystery of Moravians in Tranquebar – the ‘Hidden Seed’:
About the “visit of Morvians” much fuss is made by the missionaries themselves. The hatred of the Danish missionaries there against them is utterly surprising and inexplicable. They landed in Tranquebar in 1760 making shivers among the Danish-Halle missionaries there. When the Danish enquired, they came to know that they were sent by the Denmark King as a “Kiraikkadaikku ethir kadai” (shop opposite to green-grocery), rival shop to sell Christianity. Though, they lasted till 1803, they could counter the Danish-Protestants theologically. Anyway, this is to be taken as their internal problem, as Samuel Hugh Moffett30 characteristically calls them “the Hidden Seed” and of course, G. Samuel Iyer31 names it as a “grocery shop”. Both groups were Christians, sent by their own King, but the enmity between them is inexplicable, as the Tranquebar Danish had been very happy, when they dwindled down.
But, actually, they were a group of doctors, surgeons, botanists, astronomers, watch makers etc., specifically engaged and sent to India to study the arts and science of India, just like Le Gentil sent by the French Government. During the transit of Venus in 1761, observations were made at Tranquebar, as Le Gentil, the French astronomer did in Pondicherry. Le Gentil learned astronomy from a Brahmin of Trivalore33.
The details given about the Moravians have been very sketchy and after putting together, the picture emerged gave interesting details. Besides such professionals mentioned, particularly, doctors, there must have been patients, evidently suffering from syphilis and they were brought there for treating, curing or conducting experiment. Interestingly, the period 1760-1803 fits into TLF Folly c.1740-1803! In fact, as per their chronology, the Moravians had been there already. Therefore, the syphilis research of Folly and Moravians is revealing. The opposition and hatred shown towards Moravians is also perhaps answered.
The Mysterious Death of Moravians:
The sudden death of most of the Moravians due to diseases is really intriguing and surprising. “They were often on the verge of starvation……………….They suffered from the diseases of the liver………………..They died on the verge of starvation…………They suffered fever………….they never succeeded in the native language” The above are quoted from J. E. Hutton34 by P. Maria Lazar35 either partially or suppressing the lines which could convey some other details. In any case, the details given about them earlier contradict this situation:
- ¨ As they “had enough funds”, their starvation is intriguing.
- ¨ As they had “solid medical training” that could even present a “positive image on the Southern Coromandel Coast”, how they suffered from “diseases of the liver…” is not known.
- ¨ “They died on the verge of starvation…” again is intriguing, as if the first had been due to penury, the second must have been due to health condition or they were not in a position to eat
- ¨ “They suffered fever…” The nature of fever is not explained.
- ¨ “They never succeeded in learning the native language” – how it is related to death is not known.
Thus, again these puzzles lead to further investigation.
Nicobar Island used for Deportation of Diseased? :
The mysterious deaths occurred evidently in Nancauwery is one of the Nicobar Island. Before the arrival of the Moravians i.e., 1760, the Danish Company had withdrawn from the Nicobar Islands and had suspended traffic to Nicobar since most of the people sent to the Nicobar had died away. Thus the brethren had to wait until the Danish East India Company opened up traffic to Nicobar”. In 1768, the Company decided to open the traffic. Then, the death of brothers was described as mentioned above. Finally, it is also mentioned that “more than 30 brethren succumbed to tropical diseases“. The Nicobar Island was already in the Syphilis map of the Europeans, as has been recorded by them. Therefore, the reference mentioned here may point to the fact that the infected / quarantined patients or the persons already dying or beyond curability or recovery might have sent there as some sort of “medical deportation”.
Andreas Betschler – Did he conduct parallel research on Syphilis in Tranquebar (1760-1803)? :
It is reported that the Moravian doctors came to Tranquebar with “solid medical training with the help of which they could build a positive image on the Southern Coromandel Coast”. It is to be noted that Dr. Andreas Betschler was very efficient and popular. He was frequently sought after by the sick Europeans, and others. The Danish Governor used to take treatment from him. Over the years, the Brother garden had become a medical centre for the public. The questions arise here are –
•§ The emphasis that the doctors came there with “solid medical training” is intriguing.
•§ That “with the help of which they could build a positive image on the Southern Coromandel Coast”, implies that the earlier Danish doctors created some image.
•§ That “Dr. Andreas Betschler was very efficient and popular” and “He was frequently sought after by the sick Europeans and others” definitely shows the demand. But what for such demand necessitated?
The prevailing conditions prove Syphilis was rampant among the Europeans, particularly among the Danish and they were desperately searching for cure. As the above mentioned Botanist-doctors were also engaged in the same research, it is evident that the “search for cure” or the “discovery of a new drug” would have created the rivalry among the brethren in “the Brother Garden” (1760-1803) and “The United Brothers” (1768-1848).
Doctors posing as “Botanists” in search of Cure for Syphilis:
The above discussion clearly proves that the doctors of different specialization (as claimed or mentioned) had come here only for the following purposes:
- ¨ To study the cure of Syphilis by Indian doctors.
- ¨ To obtain medicines – ointments (kalimbu) and formulations from them.
- ¨ To visit their schools, laboratories and places of preparations.
- ¨ To meet their Gurus.
- ¨ To analyze the ingredients of the medicines.
- ¨ As the Indian doctors had not co-operated, they proceeded in their own way to obtain the plants, herbs, seeds etc., and started preparations.
- ¨ To send the collection of botanical samples, to send Indian books showing the classification of trees, plants, herbs etc., to European scientists, probably, Linnaeus, so that he could have completed the botanical classification successfully.
Syphilis compels Europeans to learn from Malabar (Tamil) Doctors:
The Europeans were called “Parangi” by the Tamils as they were infected with a contagious disease known as “Mega noi”, “Granthi noi” and so on. In fact, Johann Philip Fabricius (1711-1791) gives meaning for “Parangi” as Syphilis in his famous Tamil to English dictionary. Incidentally, the Danish official reports show that syphilis was high, wherever the Danish colonies were there in Tranquebar, Andaman & Nicobar, Mauritius etc. Thus, the Danish had been desperate to find a cure immediately. As they were getting reports from Tranquebar that some of their people were cured by the Tamil doctors, they deployed their group to study and send the report immediately.
An Indian’s Account of Syphilis:
Interestingly, Prof. D. V. Subba Reddy (1899-1987) has done much research on the subject matter. He published his thesis, “Antiquity of Syphilis (Venereal Diseases) in India”, in the Indian Journal of Venereal Diseases (Vol.2, No.2, June 1936), which fetched him Charaka Memorial Prize in 1936. Writing on the subject in many articles of the same Journal between 1938 and 1940, he published his collection in the form of a book, “Phirangi Roga or Syphilis in India in 16th and 17th Centuries: Sketches of early European Syphilographers” with extracts from their writings in 1939. Incidentally, he records an episode connected with his book, which worth to be reproduced: “It was to be dedicated to Prof. Karl Sudhoff and have a foreword from the veteran British Historian of Medicine, Sir D’ Arcy Power. The outbreak of the Second World War in 1939, stoppage of correspondence with Germany and death of British Surgeon, upset my plans. Then, though Prof. J. F. Fulton of Yale agreed to write a foreword, the two copies of the book, sent by ship, on different occasions did not reach him. Finally, I had to be content with the publication of the collected articles in a book form, with my short preface…”
Of course, he has published the following articles on the subject matter as follows:
• i. XVI Century Dutch Physician on Indian Drugs, in Bulletin of the Department of History of Medicine, Vol. III, No.3, July, 1965, pp.173-182.
• ii. Dutch Writings of 16th century on Indian Drugs, in Bulletin of the Institute of History of Medicine, Vol. I, Nos.3 & 4, July & October, 1971, pp.135-140.
• iii. A Forgotten Chapter in the History of Syphilis in India in XVI Century in Bulletin of the Institute of History of Medicine, Vol. II, No.2, April, 1972, pp.94-97.
Here, it can be noted that the “two copies of the book sent on different occasions” did not reach Prof. Fulton. Perhaps, the westerners might not have wanted such book to be published and circulated, that too with the title “Phirangi Roga” or Syphilis in India in 16th and 17th Centuries, as it might lead to further research to expose their strategies followed by them.
•§ Carl Linnaeus36 (1707-78): Influenced by the work of da’Orta, Linnaeus took much interest in Indian medicine, particularly based on herbs, flowers, creepers, seeds, plants etc. Through the works of da’Orta, van Rheede and Limmaeus, Ayurvedic traditions exerted an important and lasting influence on the development of botanical science in Europe (Grove 1995: Ch.21). He did not come to India, but his colleagues mentioned above were regularly sending him – (i) Preserved samples of plants, herbs, seeds etc, (ii) List of the above (as found in the Indian palm-leaf books) (iii)Plant Lexicon (Palm-leaf books) with classification, and (iv) Writings and jottings of interviews with the local Doctors. Using this data and information, he classified the Plant Kingdom in 1753 stating that the “number of plants in the whole world is much less than is commonly believed” 37, calculating that it “hardly reaches 10,000”, as he could not identify many species mentioned in the Tamil books. As Latin was the scientific language of the European scientists, just like Sanskrit, he Latinized the names of the plants, and thus they started appearing “scientifically”. A century later, in 1847, Lindley credited the Plant Kingdom with a total of 100,000 species in nearly 9,000 genera38. The figures of Linnaeus derived from Indian sources and the Indian medical wisdom has thus become component of modern global knowledge.
The Herbaria, Botanical Gardens and Explorations:
The Europeans operated to collects Indian medicinal books, formulations etc., in three ways:
•§ The Herbaria: The place where herbs are collected, treated, pressed, dried and displayed. However, such archival collection is not required for Indian doctors, as they believe in live-plants and they already identified and preserve the species. Ramadeva had been expert in this field. He went to Arabia to find out how the plants lived even under extreme temperatures. Later, returning to Tamizhagam, he experimented with certain plants at his herbarium at Caturagiri.
•§ Botanical Garden: Where the plants are grown. It has to be mentioned that in Tamizhagam, every temple had herbarium with many species of plants. In daily rituals, their preparations were used symbolically and given to the devotees after Abhisekam (the prescribed washing of the Idol of the presiding deity in a temple). For each devotee, a prescribed plant was there for the purpose, which was given to him as “prasada” (offering), which later, he/she took or applied according the prescription. In the Indian system of cooking and meals, the plants, herbs, seeds etc., are part and parcel of menu and they periodically consumed. In traditionally maintained cooking, families still take preparations of – (i) Different types of Paruppu (grams), (ii) Various types of Kuzhambu (where vegetables leaves, roots, are used along with mixture of leaves and seeds), (iii) Diverse Rasams (extracts of herbs), and (iv) Chutneys (rammed mass of leaves, herbs, seeds). Similar types of preparations are used in medicine by the Indian doctors either Ayurveda or Siddha. In Siddha, besides or instead of plant preparations, the inorganic chemicals are mixed to get quick relief, healing and curing. That is why the Europeans took more interest in the latter and camped in Tamizhagam, under different banners to exploit, loot, and exhaust the wisdom of Indians by all means. John Gerard of London maintained a good Botanical garden
•§ Botanical Exploration: This is nothing but grabbing the so-called “folklore medicines of the Indians”, including their books. This incidentally involved threatening, kidnapping and even killing of Indian doctors. Sadasiva Brimendrar and Ramalinga Adigal were perhaps victims of such processes; later glorified and hagiographed differently39.
British Commander gets Smallpox and is cured by Mariamma:
The story has been very famous that a British commander comes across the Mariamman festival just like Francis Xavier (1506-1552). He notices the Indian mode of inoculating to appease “the vicious, vengeful demon of smallpox”. As he ridicules, he gets the disease. For cure, he goes to the temple as per the advice of a small girl and prays. He is cured and his unbeliever wife also gets convinced of the power of Goddess, when they are saved from the sudden collapse of their house. The simple fact is that the disease (Ammai) and the cure are considered as the Goddess (Mariamma). This apocryphal story has the hidden fact of the British attempt to learn the inoculation method from the Tamils. Francis Xavier was sent to India and he made contact with the powerful Brahmin priests and medicine men40.
From Cowpox to Smallpox – Indian method of Vaccination’s Journey to Europe:
It was Vasco-da-Gama who found out that “Mari” was invoked to cure smallpox, but he or his translators made it to read as that “when he arrived Calicut in 1498, the heathens were praying Mary Mary” This is converting “Mari to Mary”, just like Cowpox turning to Smallpox41. Edward Jenner42, S.J (1749-1823) named the disease he invented as “Cowpox”. Xavier could not go further, because of his other agenda in the Coromandel Coast. However, Dr. J. Z. Holwell43 completes the story and sends his most detailed account of the Indian rites of vaccination to the College of Physicians in London in 1767. In 1792, Jenner writes his book “An Inquiry into the Causes and Effects of the Variolae Vaccine, a disease discovered in some of the Western Counties of England”, sends his paper to the Royal Society in 1797 and gets honorary M.D degree from the University of Oxford in 1813. No acknowledgement to India!
An American Medical Association book gives the following details with a picture of “A Malabar woman invoking the goddess of smallpox and carrying fire on her head symbolic of the disease”. Thus, the religious rituals of dramatic representation of the power of the Hindu goddess of smallpox, is described as follows44: “The goddess stands with two uplifted crooked daggers, threatening to strike on the right and left. Before her is a band of the executors of her vengeance. Two of them wear grinning red masks, carry black shields, and brandish naked scimitars. White lines, like rays, issue from the bodies of the others, to indicate infection. On the left there is a group of men with spotted bodies, inflicted with the malady; bells are hung at their cinctures, and a few of them wave in their hands black feathers. They are preceded by musicians with drums, who are supplicating the pity of the furious deity. Behind the goddess, on the right, there advances a bevy of smiling young women, who are carrying gracefully on their heads baskets with thanksgiving offerings, in gratitude for their lives and their beauty having been spared. There is, besides, a little boy with a bell at his girdle, who seems to be conveying something from the right arm of the goddess. This action may probably be emblematic of inoculation. In a country where every thought, word and deed are mere repetitions of those of their progenitors, a composition like this bears the stamp of great antiquity.”
Dr. J .Z. Holwell45 sent a most detailed account of these religious rites to the College of Physicians in London in 1767: “Inoculation is performed in Indostan by a particular tribe of Bramins, who are delegated annually for this service from the different Colleges of Bindoobund, Eleabas, Benares, & c. over all the distant provinces: dividing themselves into small parties, of three or four each, they plan their traveling circuits in such wise as to arrive at the places of the operation consists only in abstaining for a month from fish, milk, and ghee (a kind of butter made generally of buffalo’s milk); the prohibition of fish respects only the native Portuguese and Mahomedans, who abound in every province of the empire.”(An Account of the Manner of Inoculating for the Smallpox in the East Indies, Dr. J. Z. Holwell, F.R.S)
‘A Pious Fraud’ – A Rebuttal gives more Evidences:
Dominik Wujastyk46 has tried to prove that the claim of Indian origin of vaccination started with an article appeared in ‘Madras Courier’ dated January 12, 1819 as a letter to editor under the name ‘Calvi Virombon’. He traces the origin to one Tamil work. He then tries to assert that this article was picked up by the European writers and started writing that vaccination was invented in India before Jenner. Then he points out the opposition of the introduction of vaccination in India by the Brahmins from the 19th century British documents. He tries to interpret that one Ellis and Dr. Anderson of Madras produced some literature pointing out that the vaccination was an old practice in India and therefore, it need not be opposed by the Hindus. However, he accepts that this literature is not available. As the vaccination was prepared from the udders of British cow, the Hindus refused to get vaccinated. So the British applied Brahmins to inoculate. He also points a letter reportedly written by one Mopearl Streenivasachary (December 29, 1804) to Dr. Anderson, Madras. He also accepts that all these documents (his relied upon documents) are not available. However, he was tactfully silent on the report sent by Dr. J .Z. Holwell to the College of Physicians in London in 1767. However, the Tamil works mentioned ‘Yougimuni Cintamani’ and ‘Karisal Munnuru’ attributed to Agastya and another work ‘Jayana Vasishtham’ tell different story. The missionaries opposed and vehemently criticized when the Indian practice of vaccination was introduced in England, as they were trying to introduce ‘heathenish practices’ in Christian countries on the ‘Christian patients’!
From Small-pox to Great-pox, the Syphilis:
There have been many facts hidden behind the discovery of or attempted European discovery of cure for the diseases of smallpox and syphilis. Europeans accept that Jenner ‘discovered’ accidentally. The great argument brought against vaccination is the danger of transmitting other disease, syphilis with the lymph. During the material period, the Europeans were after cure for smallpox and syphilis besides leprosy. The real affinity of cow-pox is not to the small-pox but to the great-pox. As the Europeans of all sorts, particularly the sailors, soldiers, workers, and others, were traveling different countries they indulged in sex without any morality. The reports of naval surgeons, military doctors etc., vouchsafe such conditions (e.g., Sir George Balinggall47 1780-1855). Thus, their desperate chase after the Siddhas is understandable.
As Vasco-da-Gama48 introduced Syphilis in India through Calicut, the Tamils had a contempt for the Europeans and started calling them “Parangi”, that is the persons with such disease, syphilis. Of course, the Europeans accuse Columbus. The other names used for Syphilis are – the Great Pox, Lues, Lues Venera, the Great Mimic, the Great Imitator, Morbus Gallius, the French Disease, Spanish pockes, the Neopolitan itch, Pok Royal and each name reveals the fact behind. The cure with mercury, mercurial preparations and their availability in India made them attack India. Dr. Julius Jolly49 confirms that – “The identification of ‘Syphilis’ with the disease phiranga, phirangaroga, phirangamaya, the Franc disease is certain which, however, is mentioned in the works of the 16th century, especially in Bhavaprakasa 4.50.2 along with boils and smallpox. There its name is explained by the fact that it frequently occurs in the land of Francs (phiranga samjnake dese) i.e. in Europe. It is a gland-disease (gandharoga or gandaroga) that is caused by physical contact with a phirangin (European), (and particularly-comm) by intimate intercourse with a phirangini (European woman), and belongs to the disease. The disease originating from the external cause….the European origin of phiranga cannot, therefore, be doubted.” Thus, in the case of Syphilis, comes the surgeon – T L S Folly. The Danish took special interest in acquiring Indian medicine for curing Syphilis, as they were not satisfied with “Rob Anti-Syphilitique”. It was reportedly invented by a chemist Sieur Pierre Boyveau-Laffecteur (c.1750-1812), who worked at French Naval hospitals for thirty years.
The Indian Tribals targeted for Herbal Formulations:
Actually, Hindus respected Vanavasis (the forest dwellers and herbal doctors), as they live in their natural setting without disturbing the ecological imbalances so that the species of flora and fauna are not disturbed. Thus, there is no question of disappearance and dwindling away of any species from the mother Earth. But, the westerners had different approach of grabbing, exploitation and immediate usage for money-making. Understanding that certain Tamil tribes were having herbal medicines for syphilis, snake bite etc., the Europeans targeted them. However, in India, they had totally misunderstood the Hindu-tribes unlike that of other continents (Note that, none of the tribes are demeaned or under-estimated, the attitude of the Europeans is pointed out). They expected that they would be wild or uncivilized and so on. But, the way of their life proved otherwise. After all, Rishis and Siddhas also lived in forests. Thus, their way of life had been natural and they were the real “naturalists”. In fact, Siddhas and Rishis were guiding and protecting the tribes, as they were supplying herbs and minerals for their preparations. When, the Europeans tried to disturb them, some of them turned against them of course, literally condemning their qualities etc. Thus, some of the Siddha literature has been against Christianity, basic tenets and so on. Sivavakkiyar poems many times refute their theology implicitly and explicitly.
Bogar50 Apocryphal Story reveals that the Jesuits learned from Siddhas:
Tobacco (Lobalia inflate) was introduced into Europe from India, particularly medicinal properties, derivatives and formulations were obtained from Indian doctors. This is clearly mentioned in the books of Siddha doctors like bogar. The work Bogar7000 characteristically mentions how ‘Pothimattukkarar’ gives Tobacco to Bogar and gets medical education from him learning other formulations. ‘Pothimattukkarar’ implies the persons dealing with or handling pack-bullocks. The expression is used in derogatory manner in Tamil. First Konars (the Cattle-keepers) come to him with respect and learn the ‘Ema vittai’ (the art of converting bae metal to gold with basmam, ash). Then comes the ‘Pothimattukkarar’ to Siddha. As he was attracted towards the smell of tobacco, they offered tobacco to him. They started ridiculing him and mockering by all means. They challenged them to raise the fallen Asoka tree, which the Siddha did. Then they challenged him to bring rains, which he did again. Then, the “Pothimattukkarar” gave “Pugayilai karpam” (a compound of Tobacco) to the Siddha. Then he started teaching the ‘Pothimattukkarar’ as per the directions of his Guru. He taught them including ‘Ema vittai’. When tobacco itself had gone to Europe from India, there is no necessity for a Siddha doctor to get tobacco and have a puff and later to get its preparation. And finally, they got the art of transmutation of metal from him.
•§ Charles Curtis51: He was a Naval-surgeon of British fleet and in Madras between 1782 and 1783. He came there landing at Ceylon, Nagapatnam and Caddalore observing the cases of wounds, ulcers, burns caused by gun powder, luxes and fever diseases, cholera and different types of sores. At the Naval Hospital in Madras, he conducted many clinical studies observing and treating patients. Though, he followed modern methods, he also studied Indian sources and wrote a book, ‘An Account of Diseases of India’.
•§ Roberto de Nobili: He collected astronomical works and tables of Tamilnadu and studied the calendar making method adopted by the South Indians. At one side he criticized the Vedanga Jyotisa52, whereas on the other side, he was collecting all such astronomical works and tables. In fact, he was also discussing about Galileo’s tables with Indian astronomers. Here, one Antoniod Rubino played a role. As Ricco collected astronomical works from Cochin, he did the same from Madurai. He also compiled a Tamil book explaining the methods applicable to Church in observance of feasts and fasts of saints. After his death on January 16, 1656, his important Indian collections were sent to Rome.
Kepler and India – Nobili’s dialogue with Indian Astronomers:
That Johannes Kepler (1571-1630) had so much of contempt against Indian astronomy is intriguing. He studied the Kaliyuga and reckoning of the Hindus, but accused that Hindus borrowed from the Christians and the Jews from the Chaldeans, who, it is claimed that Messiah would appear in the Lunar year of the world 4320! Here, the important questions arise are:
• i. How and why he should have studied Kaliyuga?
• ii. What was the attraction of Kaliyuga to European scientists?
• iii. How Kepler knew about Kaliyuga, the calculations and Indian astronomy?
• iv. Why should he accuse that Hindus borrowed it from the Christians and the Jews from the Chaldeans?
• v. What was the necessity of placing Chaldeans on the top?
• vi. Why the comparison was made among the Hindus, Jews, Chaldeans and Christians?
It is very difficult to answer, but the fact is that Kepler knew all. When Nobili started debating Kepler Laws with Indian astronomers, there is a reason to believe that Nobili too knew about Kepler’s acquisition of Indian astronomy to criticize. Nilakanta’s planetary model is exactly the Tychonic model (Tycho was a contemporary of Christopher Clavius), except that it involves eliptical orbits. Tycho Brahe’s student was Johannes Kepler, who obtained his elliptical orbits by computing his (Tycho’s) observations. In 1990, physicists and writers reported that Kepler fabricated his data to obtain the planetary motion53. If the data could be obtained scientifically by working based on observations or derived formulae, one need not cook up figures, because, the figures are mathematical, which could be verified by anybody to find out the facts contained. Therefore, scientist like Kepler could not have changed his figures, unless, he got hold of some other figures, which would have appealed to him the most. As he was having only the final figures and not the working to arrive at such figures, he would have arrived at some figures without giving the source or working. Therefore, such changed figures are perhaps now mentioned as ‘fabricated’. By all means, the source material was nothing but Indian, which was given to the scientists on a platter.
Nobili had access to Brahmin secrets:
The main motive behind Nobili to masquerade as a ‘Brahmin’ is to learn astronomy and collect books from India. Jesuits understood that most of the books from north India were destroyed and taken away by the Muslims and used by the Arabs for their ‘scientific pursuits’, they came to know that south Indian Brahmins were still in possession of valuable books. During the 16th – 17th centuries, the moors were demanding huge money in the form of gold and other valuables for Indian books exploiting the European scholars. Therefore, the Jesuits planned to collect books directly from India. As Indian works were also available in Tibet, China and South East Asian countries, they targeted these countries also. Rome taking clue from Ricci ordered Nobili to don ochre to collect astronomical secrets from Brahmins.
•§ Matteo Ricco (1552-1610): He was the first batch of Jesuits trained in the new mathematics curriculum (astrology, astronomy, astronomical table preparation, calendar making etc) introduced in the Collegio Romano by Christopher Clavius. The Italian missionary was sent to China, who came to Goa, India in 1577. From there, he proceeded to China. Again, after his work in China from 1583 to 1610, he came to Goa in 1611 and stayed there for four years. In his first visit, he lived in Goa and then in Cochin from September 13, 1578 to April 15, 1582 meeting Brahmins and moors to learn recording and measuring time and collect manuscripts54. He specifically made enquiries about Indian calendar and collected connected manuscripts and took them when he left India. There is a strong reason to confirm that he must have taken the Madhava works of ‘Infinite series’ and circulated among the European scientists.
•§ Christopher Clavius (1538-1612): He collected all contemporary mathematical, geometrical, astrological, astronomical, and allied works and introduced the new mathematics curriculum (astrology, astronomy, astronomical table preparation, calendar making etc) in the Collegio Romano. He was a ‘Jesuit friend’ of Johannes Kepler and chided by Tycho Brahe for writing so many letters and supplier of manuscripts to Galelio Galeli, while visiting to the Jesuit Roman College Collegio Romano.55 His discovery of ‘Gregorian Calendar’ has been kept in secrecy, as many contemporary scientists criticized his ‘mystical methods’ applied. Kepler commented, ‘After all, Easter is a feast, not a planet” (about his addition of 97 days to every 400 years to get correct date of Easter!). Joseph Scaliger rejected it dubbing him as a ‘German potbelly’.
Nobili’s Interest in Indian Cosmology:
Nobili was startled and thrilled to know that such concepts were there already in Tamil books/manuscripts. One manuscript “Olagathuva Sasthiram” (The Knowledge of Earth) gives the following details:
16 hair-breadths = 1 scratch
16 scratches = 1 finger breadth
16 finger-breadths = 1 foot
5 feet = 1 arm’s length
3000 arm’s length = 1 astronomical kadham (1 kadham = 8 miles = 12.8 kms)
Then the diameters of planets are given as follows in terms of kadhams: The greatest circumference of earth = 7920 k = 101376 kms.
Thus, it is very evident that Galeli and Kepler got the details from Antonio Rubino and Nobili, who sent the books to Goa and from there they reached Rome. Kepler proposed the elliptical orbit concept only in 1609.
•§ Pope Gregory XIII (1572-1585)56: He was the reformer of the Julian calendar (later known as the Gregorian calendar) Decreed in 1582 that a calendar with fasts and feasts be adopted by the Roman Catholics, heavily depended on the Indian astronomical tables. To reform the calendar, he constituted a commission, which included astronomers like Italian physicist Lilio57, who had been familiar with Indian calendar and time reckoning and headed by Christoph Clavius. It is evident that he must have procured Indian methods of construction of calendar. He was to complete another great work, closely allied to the reform of calendar – the publication of the Roman Martyrology. The Saints whose feasts had to be celebrated only in certain places were inserted in of the Roman Martyrology.
•§ Chronological Pursuits: The European scholars had been curious and inquisitive about the Indian sciences, as they used to learn through Arabs. As they came to know that the Arabs were only passing on Indian arts and sciences besides the goods, they decided to deal with India directly. As the sea-route was dominated by Moors/Muslims, the missionaries tried to reach land and after establishment of their base at Goa, the ancient power seat of Kadambas (who dominated the trade with middle-east for centuries) the Portuguese tried to command their men from there.
•§ The Transit of Venus and India58: India has been the suitable location to study the transit of Venus for many centuries. Interestingly astronomers and scholars have never missed to visit India on such occasions. John Playfair gives details of the visits of Jesuits to Tamizhagam, their collection of astronomical and mathematical tables from different places. The movement of Coeurdoux from Krishnabourum to Maddigubba to Dharmavaram and reporting to Paris unfolds two aspects-astronomical observation and investigation of textile technology and chemistry; and sending the connected data, information and books.
Indian Saltpetre and Scientific Geometry / Crystallography:
Nobili collected many works on Indian crystallography, otherwise known as ‘Madhyama kshara’. Some of the salts were mentioned as Dandi (Balio Spermun Montanum), Dravanti (Salvinia Cucullata), Chitraka (Plumbago Zeylanica), Langaliki (Gloriosa Superba) and so on. Ayurveda contains usage of salts, but prepared and mixed judiciously to get desired cures. Indian saltpetre made the Europeans sensational in many aspects – the connected pyrotechnics was unknown to them; the crystallogragy was hidden knowledge; the alchemy was divine secret; and above all the explosive nature God-sent warfare. The samples of salt crystals of different colors, sizes and shapes and the connected works brought by the Jesuits induced the scholars, mathematicians, chemists, physicists, scientists and others in different angles. There were potassium nitrate and other alkaline salts, but all were not inflammatory or explosive, as they were used to heal disease, make soap, glass, fertilizers and textiles. Immediately, they understood as to how the textiles were processed, dyes manufactured, designs printed, metals extracted and purified, medicinal preparations made and so on. The calculation of numbers from the infinitesimal to infinity; distances and time accordingly, but always associating with man and nature had been illuminating, interesting and thought provoking. Indians kept the processing of such salts secret restricted to certain groups, what the Portuguese jealously called ‘castas’, which have become “castes’ now creating havoc. But technology held by them for generations was disappearing. As “Siddhas” or “Siddha like sadhus” were reportedly having such knowledge, the Jesuits and Mohammedans also targeted them. The other side of Saltpetre was that Europeans mainly used it for making gunpowder and used in battles. Saltpetre trade was started by the Dutch first in the Coromandel Coast. The Dutch and Portuguese were purchasing saltpetre from the east coast in huge quantities during 17th century. To compete, the British also entered.
Vediyuppu – Sodium Nitrate – Gunpowder:
The Siddha literature had been abundant with references to explosives using different types of naturally available salts. In India, the dynamites/explosives were used extensively for quarrying purposes, as they required large quantities of stones for building purposes. The rock-cut temples, monolithic monuments, lengthy pillars and slabs prove the tactful breakage of stones from rocky mountain along its cleavages. Another usage was for pyro-technique mixtures. Explosives were manufactured simply with saltpetre or potassium known as ‘Vediyuppu’, literally meaning ‘the salt that explodes’. However, they kept it as guarded secret, as the general belief of Indians has been such techniques should not fall into the hands of weak or perverted minds leading to disastrous consequences. But, the Europeans and Mohammedan rulers started knowing about it through Jesuits and tried to exploit for explosives. Tipu Sultan employed some experts to manufacture explosives to be used in battle. In 1646, the British started refining and processing saltpetre in their Malpore factory at Gujarat and packing such refined/ processed saltpetre in raw hides to prevent the loss in storage. In 1652, at Balasore and Hoogly factories, they found the processing was very expensive, as 200 out of 600 copper pans were damaged. However, as the Dutch could get Indian expertise, they could process easily and pack the processed powder in wooden barrels and then transferred to jars, known as Martaban jars purchased from Burma, so that the gunpowder could be kept for years. Tipu Sultan extracted the technique from the Siddhas by force. The Ashram of Sadasiv Bramendra was destroyed by the army. Actually, the Siddhas did not want such technology should fall in the hands of tyrants who could try to destroy the humanity and the world. That is why they kept it as secret.
•2. Madurai – European Centre for Production of Indian Mathematical and Astronomical Books and Transfer to European Scholars and Scientists:
The selection of Madurai by the Jesuits is significant and that is analyzed as follows by taking into consideration different European connections. Interestingly Augustus De Morgan59 (1806-1871), was born (blind in one eye) in 1806 in Madurai, where his father was associated with the East India Company. His DeMorgan’s laws, which were named after him stated:
“The negation of an ‘and’ statement is logically equivalent to the ‘or’ statement in which each component is negated.”
“The negation of an ‘or’ statement is logically equivalent to the ‘and’ statement in which each component is negated.”
De Morgan’s laws were an important element in the field of symbolic logic. It made things easier for other mathematicians to study symbolic logic and made them more receptive towards this abstract and radical study. De Morgan’s laws also played an important role in the study of sets theory that sprang up after his death.
The University of Astronomy at Madurai:
None cared to probe into why the Jesuit missionaries come to Madurai all along the way begging permission from the Naik Kings to start their activities. The European writers have been too clever to suppress the fact that they wanted to come there to get all details what they required, as the European scientists were struggling with numbers, hypotheses and theories. The model of ‘Christopher Clavious’ is followed faithfully60. The Jesuits learned Tamil along with Indian school children writing alphabets on the sand to at least read and understand so that they could locate and identify the palm-books, they wanted. Their grudge, antipathy and hatred against ‘Brahmins’ had been due to the fact that they never wanted to teach them, as they equated them with ‘mlechas’ i.e. they might use the acquired knowledge against the humanity.
According to Roberto de Nobili, Madurai was the excellent university where 10,000 Brahmins were learning different arts and sciences into groups of 200-300 under professionals. It was a residential university of which the King had taken care of finance. Understanding this he came here as a ‘Romapuri Brahmin’. Fr. Buccerio’s account61 proves that he acted as a Brahmin in all aspects just to fool the Hindus.
Take the case of inoculation, they did not want to learn it properly, but steal the knowledge in piece-meal, applied on experimental basis and killing people. Jenner inoculated his son, John Phipps son of his gardener, but both died. Of course the fate of two daughters of the Prince of Wales is not known who were inoculated by the Jesuits learning ‘the Indian religious rite’. The medical formulations have been useful and harmful to human-beings depending upon the nature of body. The Siddha and Ayurvedic medicines cannot be applied as such in the same manner prepared or manufactured in one country to another country. The Indian doctors have recorded such truths in their books, but the western doctors, pharmacists and pharmaceutical manufacturers did not care and experimented with animals and human-beings for clinical results and killed lakhs of people without their knowledge.
•§ Antonio Rubino (1590-1608), ‘The Astronomically Interested Missionary’: Antonio Rubino was a Piedmontse missionary, but ‘with astronomical interest’ as reported by western writers. He was entrusted with the main job to collect all astronomical, mathematical and scientific manuscripts with instruments and gadgets used by the Brahmins62. He was associated with Galeli Galileo (1564-1642), who was very much interested in getting Indian works after knowing details through his friends. As he tried to know astronomical secrets, he developed friendship with Brahmins. He was astonished at the interest taken by Brahmins ‘in the movement and aspects of stars and planets, particularly of those twenty-seven which rule men’s lives’. Vincent Cronin characteristically notes that, ‘”he had tried to find out how they predicted ‘the hour and even the minute of solar and lunar eclipses’, but with no success, for Brahmins guarded these secrets closely” adding that “Nobili, however, had access to Brahmin secrets”. He was informing Nobili about the inquiries and workings of Galileo. His “Account of the History and Religion of Vijayanagara (1608)” is interesting63.
•§ Jean Venant Bouchet (1655-1732): Siam became the nerve centre of the Jesuits, the moment the Hindu astronomical tables created a great debate among the European scientists. Simon de La Loubere (1642-1729) brought an extract of a Siamese manuscript containing tables and rules for calculating the places of sun and moon (Mem de l’Acad. Des Science, tom.8, p.281 & c). Inspired by this, the European scientists started their research in the tables. He was expelled from Siam for his activities. Bouchet in spite of his hobnobbing with John Britto and Panaraswamis, could cover coromandel coast by foot recording astronomical observation, making maps and sending them to France (from 1689 onwards). Here, the collusion of French missionaries with other European missionaries is revealed. Thus, it is evident that the ‘Pandaraswamis’ were their informers, helpers and collaborators for the Jesuits in getting the Indian palm-leaf-books. R. K. Kochar64 describes it as: “Obviously there was some sort of coordination between the Jesuit data collectors on the one hand and the French commercial and political interests, on the other hand”. The Jesuits sent many manuscript charts, and other materials to France continuously. D’ Anville prepared a map with the help of these materials (as the paper is restricted to Tamizhagam, the activities of north-India is not mentioned e.g. James Runnel (1742-1830), Anthony Monserrate (1536-1600), Claude Stanislaus Boudier (1686-1757), Joseph Tieffenthaler (1710-1785), Francis Xavier Wendel (c.1730-1803) etc, who have collected many Indian maps, charts, tables, samples and books on different sciences). As the Indian maps, geographical diagrams, pictures, charts were continuously taken away by the missionaries; maps drawn by Indians are not available and they are accused of their ignorance of ‘cartography’ in spite of their ship-building, navigation and oceanic adventures undertaken to different countries!
•§ Fr. Richard: He was a companion of Bouchet interested in the collection of astronomical charts, tables and lists of stars. Just like the fight between Newton and Leibniz over the claim of ‘discovery of Calculus’, there was a fight between him and another Fr. Fontenay about the ‘discovery of new stars’. Finally, Fontenay was credited with the discovery of the first Binary Alpha Crucis in 1685 from the Cape of Good Hope to reach India; and Richaud that of southern bright star Alpha Centauri in 1689 from India itself!
•§ Abraham Hyacinthe Antiquetil de Perron (1731-1805): He is the French collector of Indian mathematical and astronomical books, besides the Persian and Sanskrit. Had been in India between 1755 and 1764, and linking many Jesuits of India, he is generally credited with the translation of the Zend-Acestha (1771) and the Upanishads in Latin (1804). When he was forced to leave India to France in 1764, he took 180 manuscripts (Indian books). When Fr. Pere Coeurdoux was sending astronomical tables and books from Tamizhagam to Fr. Souchet, Paris, his name is figured in the context of an alleged book attributed to Beschi. Thus, his interest in Parsi and Sanskrit appeared to have excelled in the study of Tamizhagam astronomical manuscripts. He helped the Jesuits in translating Indian books to French and Latin and acted as a conduit for the manuscripts taking out of India. For example, Joseph Tieffenthaler in 1773 entrusted him with his voluminous collection of his works in Latin to a Prof. Krat Zenstein through the agency of a Dutch doctor, whom he met in India and other material to him directly.
•§ Tycho Brahe (1546-1601): About his involvement in transmission of Nilakanta Somasutvan (1444-1550) works to Europe, studies have been already published. Here, his dealing with astronomical instruments is studied. In his preface to ‘Mechanica’ to the Noblest Emperor Rudolph the 2nd, he comes out with the following details65:
- ¨ God made men to discover astronomy etc., because it is ‘divine astronomy’ and make instruments following the Christian Prophets.
- ¨ Many other devices that were constructed for this purpose by the most ancient kings were once observed, such as in India, Syria, Arabia, Chaldea, Ethipia, Egypt.
- ¨ The Arabs used zodiac armillaries (armillary sphere), torquetum, and plane astrolabe.
- ¨ He laments about many other astronomical instruments that might be perished due to frequent changes of the world.
- ¨ He accepts that recently (in 16th-17th centuries), the instruments used were quadrant, radius, and astronomical rings.
- ¨ About the usage of astronomical instruments by Copernicus, he records that “partly from those instruments considered to have been used by him that which still remain”.
- ¨ Then, he explains how he tried to construct ‘astronomical instruments’ since childhood but failed.
- ¨ He notes that “Ptolemy is seen to complain loudly about the same kind of instruments, which were made of solid metal and once used to stand in the Colonnade at Alexandria”, but he was making with wood.
- ¨ He mentions about “a certain very large quadrant intended for altitudes only, which I once used at Ausburg, in my youth”. Then, he mentions about the instruments he purchased without mentioning the source.
- ¨ “a certain steel quadrant, which I brought up earlier” –
- ¨ About his instruments, he says, “…..my instruments, which are not yet drawn and which I am not ready to exhibit, where also is added some indication of those that I am still thinking of constructing to great advantage”.
- ¨ Finally, he mentions about a “very great globe made of brass, which comprehends 1000 fixed stars that were placed by me with the greatest care and precision many years ago now….”
Thus, though the Arabs are mentioned, India is mentioned initially and not afterwards. The Indian works Surya Siddhanta, Aryabhatiyam and other ‘Karanam’ works mention about the practical astronomical instruments like armillary sphere, gnomon, compass, etc., for observations. The Siddhantic tables were extensively used for the preparation of Alphonso tables. Therefore, the astronomical instruments mentioned, particularly made of solid metal, steel and brass must have come from India during the material period. As the Indian books and tables had gone there, based on them it is unbelievable that they could not have known the Indian instruments and obtained. After all, the Arabs had only borrowed from India and introduced in Europe and the Europeans name them with Arabic adjectives – al-gamest, algorism, al-gorithm, al-gebra, al-kali, al-chemy, al-cohol, al-embic and so on. But, such naming alone cannot make them the owners or inventers. Any way, at that time, perhaps, the westerners never thought of intellectual property rights and so on!
The double-standards adopted by the European writers and researchers:
The European interest in Indian medicine had been open secret. That EIC established botanical gardens, collected Indian samples, wanted to classify Indian flora according to Linnaeus, conduct scientific investigation, etc., and were well recorded. They made efforts to collect the knowledge of Indian medicine, material medica, medicines themselves from the Indian scholars and doctors. However, they pretended as if the Indian doctors were quacks and not diagnosing scientifically and so on. They even accused that Indian doctors were not aware of the circulation of blood, did not perform autopsies and had little knowledge of anatomy. This is just like Roberto de Nobili questioning a Hindu astronomer as to whether he knew Kepler’s laws! They also alleged that the knowledge possessed by them was degenerated and clouded with religious superstition. Unfortunately, they are definitely accusing Hindus just for their weakness of religious fundamentalism during the material period. The circulation of blood, autopsy etc., were heavily condemned by the Church and they wanted to find an excuse from the Hindu doctors, but as the Hindu system had already been well established and time-tested, such preliminaries were not required. In fact, the so called discovery of circulation of blood, transfusion of blood resulted in creation of more denominations detaching from Catholicism.
Medicinal Works – Sthala Puranas – Vrukshayurveda – Sidhha Works:
•§ Collin Mackanzie (1753-c.1820): He came to India in 1782, working in Madras, Coimbatore, Tindugul, Nellore, Gundur, Mysore, Calcutta and Java, he bought thousands of manuscripts/palm-leaf books, charts, maps, and antiques related to all subjects of India, mainly concentrating on ancient Indian arts and sciences. Before coming he was already collecting details of Indian mathematics and astronomy. Vedanayagam Sastry, who worked with him in copying, making or rewriting manuscripts, has obeyed in master to do so as is revealed in his own confessional sort of statement in the ‘Idangai Valangai Varalaru’ and ‘Viswapurana Vacanam’. Thus, it is evident that many manuscripts were manufactured as per the directions of Mackanzie, which are now printed and circulated as originals. Moreover, the entire original collection was sent to England and returned partly (one-third retained in England), which is only numbered and preserved in Oriental Manuscript Library, Madras. To quote Robert W. Wink here is pertinent: “The most impressive orientalist explorations were collaborative, unofficial and voluntary. Among these, none matched the enormous privately funded venture by Colonel Colin Mackanzie. His teams of Maratha Brahmin scholars begged, bought or borrowed and copied from village heads, virtually every manuscript of value they could finally acquire. Collections so acquired, reflecting the civilization of South India, manuscripts in every language, became a lasting legacy – something still being explored.” Thus, here also, Christians and as well as converted Christians have consciously worked in suppressing the antiquity of India by suppressing manuscripts and creating manuscripts as ‘original ones’, which are against the Hindu interests. Here, the Hindu response has been nil. Actually, they should have demanded all manuscripts/palm-leaf books from England knowing the fact.
Logarithm Tables evolved from the Tables of Tamizhagam/South India:
Suryadeva Yajva (c.1191-1270) was a great astronomer in the courts of Rajaraja (985-1014) and Rajendra (1012-1044) Cholas. He helped the Kings during their campaigns to Gangetic areas and South-East Asian Countries for the naval expeditions. He also informed them about the Naval Academy functioning at Kanthalursalai having links with Moors. Thus Rajarajan immediately took action and destroyed their base dangerous to South India seizing many ships of the Cheras. Later, they were inducted in his navy. Yajva only wrote a commentary for Aryabhatiyam, but compiled astronomical data and tables based on his observations during his journey along with the Kings. With the advent of Vijayanagara Empire, science and technology flourished well in South India. Most of the Northern-Hindu scholars moved to South India and many went to South-East Asian countries, because of the Mohammedan atrocities. The Kanthalursalai episode proves the link between the astronomers and mathematicians working in Tamizhagam (including Kerala areas in those days) astronomers. As Vijayanagar Empires promoted sciences, there was a spurt in the activities of astronomy. Most of the progeny of scholars of the Chola courts started moving to them. Warren incidentally prepared his work Kala Sankalita based on Tamizhagam astronomical tables. Robert Sewell also compiled an astronomical table. Having Sine, Cosine and other tables, he could develop, enlarge and compile a table easily.
•3. Pondicherry – the French Centre Feeding European Scholars and Scientists:
•§ Joseph Constanzo (Constantius) Beschi66 (1680-1742): He came to Tamizhagam (Tutucorin) in 1710 and started learning Tamil from Pundit Subradipa Kavirayar in Madurai. He collected many Sanskrit and Tamil religious books on ethics, philosophy, logics, astronomy, medicine etc, and employed Pundits to read and translate. He employed Siddhanta Pandaram to compose Gnana Vilakkam. Julien Vinson67, who has complete and exhaustive study of Beschi’s works up to 1899, points out that Tembavani “is a strange imitations of old classical Tamil works with which the author mixed up Italian reminiscences”. He has also questioned the authorship of two other works. In fact, such works are listed under ‘Varia and Doubtful’ and the works circulated in his names ‘Books wrongly attributed to Beschi’ by L. Besse68. His contemporary Tamil poet, Muthusami Pillai in his “Veda Vikarpattikaram” points out his manipulations and opposes his Christianization of Indian ideas. On the other side, his collection of Indian books on astronomy, mathematics and medicine had been as usual as that of any missionary. He got hold of many books attributed to different Siddhas, rewritten and presented as his own. The books like Nasa Kandam, Rathina Curukkam, Vaithiya Murai etc, prove the fact. The genealogical tree prepared and reportedly presented to Bangara Tirumalai Nayakkar of Madurai69 proves his acquiring of astronomical, mathematical and geographical books and tables.
The Jesuit Discussion on ‘Tirucabai Kanitham’ proves the passage of Indian astronomical works to Europe70:
A Tamil astronomical manuscript was found at St. Joseph’s College, under the title numbering 24 sheets or 48 pages. The date of 1801 was written at the end of within a circle, with these words: Inda nidi kanakkum tidi kanakkum 1801 tuvakki, varushandorum tavaramel, Ulaga mudiya mattum aryalam (This calculation of days, months start from 1801. With this one can calculate such days and months for every year till the end of the world). The Christians believed that the table was meant for the Dominical letters going from 1800 to 1900 for Christian purpose and others opined it was a Hindu calendar:
•§ L. Besse comments that, “If we are not mistaken, we are in presence of a perpetual calendar; such are to be found at the beginning of the Roman Breviaries, to find out the date of Easter and of the other festivals of the church”.
•§ Julien Vinson thinks that under this title, is designated the fourth Appendix in the Tamil-Latin dictionary. But, Besse opines that this is quite a distinct work.
•§ Rev. E. Hoole (1844) calls this work “a treatise on Astronomy, is in verse and prose”. It has never been printed, but copies may be found in our libraries.
The opinions divide, because there were different manuscripts attributed:
• i. “A memoir on the concordance of the Hindu Kalendar and the Gregorian Kalendar”. This was the fourth Appendix to the Tamil-Latin Dictionary, already mentioned. It was written in Latin. We surmise that the note added by M. Mousset, p. 186-192, to the Grammar of Common Tamil (1843), on the Hindu calendar and the conversion of Indian dates, is based upon this memoir.
• ii. This memoir was published in French by J. Vinson, in his Revue de Linguistique, (t. xx, 1887, p.97-113). It has therefore only sixteen pages, and cannot be identical with the Tirucabai Kanidam, which contains fifty.
•iii. It had been also published in French, p.383-402, in the following work: Lettres sur Contantinople de M.l’abbe Sevin, suivies de plusieurs lettres de Peyssonnel, continant des details curieux sur l’empire Ottoman. On y a joint la relation du Consulat d’Anquetil a Surate un memoire du savant Beschi, sur le calendrier de Pinterieur de l’inde, revue par Jerome Lalande. Paris, Obre, an x (1802) s-vo. De xvi, 452 p.
Fr. Pere Coeurdoux, S.J., writing Fr. P. Etienne Souciet, Paris says: “I hope to send Your Reverence a small memoir composed by an Italian Father who is among the Portuguese Fathers, on the method followed by Indian calculators to find the first day of each month, etc. After translating it, I sent to that Father, who understands French. As we are at a great distance from each other, and there is no regular postal service in this country, I foresee that I shall not be able to receive back and send it before the departure of the last ships.” (Khrishmabouram, 2 November, 1733).
From the same to the same: “I do not send, this small writing of which I spoke to you, and which treats of the way of finding out the beginning of the Indian solar months. As they are lunar in these parts, I neglected that trifle to which I may go back when the divine providence recall me to the Tamil country, where the months are solar”. (Madigoubba, 10th September 1734).
The same to the same: “You have heard of the death of Fr. de Bourzes…As regards the so called treatise of Fr. Constantius Beschi of which late Father has spoken to you, it is a very small writing on the manner of finding out the beginning of the year and of the Tamil months for the Tamil country, where the year is solar. Fr. Beshi who had put it in Latin, had send it to me, and I had begun to put in it French with some alterations. As I came then into the Telugu country, where the months are lunar, although the year is luni-solar (a fact, I believe, which is not known by any Indian calculator of these parts), I neglected to finish this little method, which I shall try to do, whenever any business compels me to visit Pondicherry and the Tamil country again”. (Dharmavaran, 13th September 1735).
In 1733, Fr. de Bourzes wrote to the same Father Souciet: “Finally they have found out the cause of the inequality of the months. I suppose our Pondicherry Fathers would have communicated it in France. I saw a small treatise about it composed by one of our Fathers of Madurey (Father Joseph Constantinus Beschi, an Italian). I had made a précis of it to communicate to Your Reverence, as I have it not with me at present, I can only tell you what has remained vaguely in my memory. “The Indians begin the month on the day when the Sun, according to their calculations, enters a new sign. The entrance into new sign happens but rarely at dawn, when they begin the day. Hence the rule that the civil month begins in the morning, upon the entering of Sun in the new sign. However, they add to the astronomical month following what remains of hours and minutes, since the entrance of the Sun till the above said morning. E.g. the sun according to their calculations must enter Aries on Sunday noon, the month chittrye civil (April), which corresponds to it, will begin only on Monday morning. But, the maker of almanach will all the same count the hours and minutes, which elapsed till Monday morning and allot them to chittirey, to know when it must end. So, April will be shorter in proportion as March will have finished earlier before the Monday morning. The sooner the Sun enters Aries, the sooner will it go out of it. That is the reason why one year March will be of 30 days and another year of 29 or 30”.
About this work, Fr. Beschi says: “I have at last finished the treatise of the Indian months and years; I say treatise, because my work is longer than I thought at first. But I had to explain the system of those mathematicians and give the reason for their calculations; or reasons which they do not themselves, I consulted several Brahmins; scarcely did I found who could tell me things even materially. When I asked for the reason of it, they answered: Sic voluere priores. I had much trouble for several months, who pout everything in the order in which you will find it.”- (Beschi quoted by Fr. de Bourzes in his letter to Fr. Souceiet). The doubt is there as to whether Fr. Beschi wrote it in Tamil or Latin, as the opinion divides – one group says that it was written in Tamil, another asserts it was in Latin. This was translated by Fr. Coerdoux into French. Again another suspicion is whether the text published by M. labbe Savin and later on by J. Vinson, was Fr. Couerdex’s translation. To the worst, M. Labbe Sevin says it was printed “after the original which has never been published.” In any case, the above discussion exposes the following facts:
•§ The French Connection: The French Jesuits helped Indian books reaching European scientists. As noted by Fr. Pere Coeurdoux, S.J. played a key role. Incidentally, George Byran Souza71 points out the fact in the context of transmission textile and textile technology to Europe. From Pondicherry, Beaulieux in 1737 and Coeurdoux in 1742 and 1747 wrote authoritative letters and reports on the fabrication of painted cottons in southern India. Here, he was reporting, moving from different places about the astronomical methods followed by Indian astronomers.
•§ The Multi-pronged Attack on India: The European Companies, the Jesuits and missionaries acted together collecting and supplying data and information to European writers, scientists, doctors and technocrats. In fact, they had carried out all sorts of political, scientific, industrial, commercial and social espionage.
•§ Nadi Sastra – The Art of Pulse, Pulse Diagnosis etc: The concept of pulse and pulse diagnosis has been Hindu and it spread to other countries through the ‘Travelling Doctors.’ Thousands of palm-leaf books on the subject were taken away by the Chinese, Greeks, Arabs and the Jesuits. Coming under the category of ‘Hidden knowledge’ category, Hindus guarded it under ‘Tantric literature’ and later, Tamil Siddhas started incorporated in their literature. It is based on ‘Tridosha tatva’ linking nerves, the six nerve-plexuses, body liquids, breadth and yoga. As it mainly depends on the science of breadth, Siddhas taught only under Gurukula system. The Jesuits aided and abetted by the European scientists virtually looted the Siddha literature. They have not left out Ceylon and South-East Asian countries also, as they formed part of India with continuing Hindu medical tradition and system. As mentioned above, the ‘Science of Pulse’ spread through Silk routes. Praxogoras of Leos was the first to adopt pulse diagnosis in the west.
Fake Siddhas/Sanyasis/Iyers/Pandarams/Sufis/Gnaniyar/Pirs/Yogis etc:
As far as Masqueraded Siddhas are concerned, they were there even during the Tirumular period and hence, Tirumular72 has condemned them like anything.
•§ He urged that it is the duty of the ruler to contain such imposters.
•§ Those who do not have and follow the Vedic principles, there is no meaning for them to masquerade with saffron dress and other paraphernalia.
•§ It is better to cut off their gudimi (the tout) and punul (sacred thread).
•§ The ruler has to investigate into such activities.
•§ He accused the destroyers of temples and breakers of idols in clear terms.
•§ A consecrated Linga should not be removed from its place for any reason.
•§ Not even a brick should fall from the compound of any temple.
•§ If anything happens like that, he warns that sufferings would increase, rains stop, the (good) rule disappear and so on.
Therefore, it is evident that the moment, Siddhas deviate from the traditional path / Tirumular tradition, and switched over to the practices of rasavada, the fake Siddhas started increasing. Fake Siddha works also increased accordingly. Moreover, the fake Siddhas started destroying the works of others. The genuine Siddhas also started destroying their own works fearing that their works should fall into the hands of quacks and imposters, so that the time tested methods are misused by them. They have recorded the tearing down the palm leave manuscripts of many works in their poems themselves. That is why the researchers now declare that the original works of Siddhas have already disappeared. The available Siddha works have been composed by some poets and circulated in their names and are forged.73 Purnalingam Pillai has gone to the extent of telling that Siddhas have done a great injustice to the Tamil literature because, though their works appear as poems, they contain very ordinary words and expressions just like prose, language, syntax, colloquial vocabulary etc.
Here, three fake / imposter groups have to be analyzed. For convenience and identification, they are mentioned as follows:
•\ Hindu Group: The Hindu Siddha group divided because of the intrusion and infiltration of the fake/masquerade Christian and Mohammedan groups. Both non-Hindu categories had done maximum harm by converting Hindus resulting in social division of ‘hate-groups’. Mackanzie is the direct evidence, who directed the convert Vedanayagam to write forged Valangai Puranam to poison the Hindu society. Thus, the Siddha group got divided and started accusing each other in the creation of polemic literature, which was/is exploited by the Christian and Muslims for their search now. However, the Hindu supporting Siddhas have been meticulous in maintaining their stand. Thus, this group is mentioned as ‘Sanyasi-Siddhas’ in the Hindu context for convenience.
•V Christian Group: First, as usual the Jesuits must have roamed here as Sanyasis to collect preliminary information, as otherwise, the Masquerade Nobili or the Romapuri Sanyasi could not have staged his drama so meticulously at Madurai amidst the so-called ‘Brahminical Fort’ of Hindudom/Heathendom with their diabolic religious practices proving their gentility, as has been faithfully recorded by them in their divine language of Latin, though, they were credited with learning ‘dead language Sanskrit’ and ‘sacred Tamil’ going on composing poems without the knowledge of Tamil poets of the material period. The Catholic-Protestant rivalry turned religious polemic literature, had been there as has been revealed through the action taken against Robert de Nobili, the ‘theological or literary’ fight between Ziegenbalg and Beschi etc. However, the Christians could suppress the literature and few come to the knowledge of Indian researchers. Thus, this group is mentioned as ‘Jesuit-Siddhas’ in the Christian context for convenience.
•Z Mohammedan Group: The word ‘Mohammed’ is used strictly in legal sense, till they wanted to be called as ‘Muslims’ by themselves quite recently. The Mohammedans divided about the study of Tamil, composing Tamil literature involving their God – Allah, Mohammed, Wives of Mohammed etc. But without projecting them, they could not learn Tamil from the Hindu teachers; compose poems learning the nuances from Hindu poets and circulate in their names. So orthodox Mohammedans started restricting them to what extent they could describe/praise Allah without amounting it to ‘Idoltary’, Prophet particularly, when they started composing ‘Nabi Pillait Tamizh’ (as they could not describe all the Paruvams just like Hindu poets describing Hindu God), Prophet and his wives etc. If this is the ‘Tamil literary problem’, the problem of ‘Mohammedan Siddhas’ in search of India medicine persisted at the other side. So the orthodoxy condemned them. Thus, this group is mentioned as ‘Sufi-Siddhas’ in the Mohammedan context for convenience. Similarly, the Muslim mystics have criticized and condemned the fake mystics/saints as poli gnaniyar. Particularly, Pir Mohammed Appa and Maccaregai Sittan used strong language to condemn them. They are Kafirs, as they misinterpret scriptures, they recite scriptures like dogs for money, eulogize falling at the feet of Pirs – thus, Pir Mohammed Appa condemns. Maccaregai Sittan condemns them as the masqueraded Saitans, who came as Shaikh, Syed, Fakir, Mastan, Kamil, Ganani, Yogi etc. With facade of Sufis, they misled the common people and exploit them with their spurious messages. Here, the words as Shaik, Syed, Fakir, Mastan, Kamil, etc specifically denote Muslims and Ganani, Yogi – Muslim and non-Muslims. Therefore, the following facts are evident:
• i. The so called fake Shaiks, Syeds, Fakirs, Mastans, Kamils, Gananis, Yogis etc would have been opposed as they had un-Islamic opinion and practiced connected methods with objectionable paraphernalia.
• ii. The Shaiks, Syeds, Fakirs, Mastans, Kamils, Gananis, Yogis etc would have gone to the extent of appearing as Hindu counterparts or the difference would have been disappeared and thus, the orthodox Sufis would have warned in their poems.
• iii. Non-Muslims might have been attracted towards Sufism and adapted and adopted such dress, practice etc. As the orthodox Muslims did not want their mixing with Muslims, they would have warned.
Why this type of fake Siddha-Sufi groups should have increased during the 18th – 20th century period is to be studied critically. It is evident that these groups indulged in non-spiritual activities. That is why Sivavakkiyar has categorically refuted the communalist Siddhas and Sufis:
“Is there your God and our God thus God existing separately,
Can God exist here and there as two Gods for two believers
Do not you know that the omnipresent God is one
Those who differentiate God would die with disease in their mouths”.
How these groups could be divided is discussed now:
•§ Fake Saints/imposters existing in their own Religion: As there was respect in the society, the fakes would have imitated through name, dress, behavior and other external factors, though they were not match with the genuine ones in intellectual and spiritual capacities.
•§ Fake Saints/imposters existed to cheat/undermine the Other Religion: As the other religionists wanted to know the theology, philosophy, liturgy etc, they tried to don the robes so that they could dupe ordinary people with their expertise. Particularly, for conversion activities, such methodology was adapted and adopted.
•§ Masquerade as the Religion of the Majority: To get the confidence of Gurus, head of mutts, Siddhas and others, one has to don the robes and mannerism of the religion of the majority and thus they followed the suit.
•§ Masquerade to Grab the Secrets of other Religion: Indian religion was supposed to possess many secrets like elixir, transmutation of metals, flying, levitation, transmigration, and so on. Therefore, the other religionists were very much interested in learning such tricks and other magic. Thus, they donned the robes of Siddhas. Most of them were interested in rasavada techniques and those who could not learn successfully, roamed to cheat the public.
•§ Masquerade for Political Purposes: Many worked as spies for the rulers sending information to them as they could freely move in different parts of the country and move with all people without restriction.
These tendencies were noted in both the categories of Siddhas and Sufis during the material period as has been recorded and reflected through the respective literature as pointed out above. As fake saints/imposters increased, their literature also increased. Therefore, they are studied critically.
Fake/Forged Siddha-Jesuit-Sufi Literature:
Except the compilation of Siddha literature available as ‘Siddhar padalgal’, ‘Periya Gnanakkovai’, among the works of name and style, Vaidhyam – 1000, Karukkidai Vaidhyam – 600, Bogar Vaidhyam – 1000, Karpam – 360, Gnanasaramsam – 100 etc, attributed to Tirumular, Agasthiyar etc, are mostly forged. However, the existence of genuine Siddha literature on medicine is not questioned or doubted and the discussion is restricted here only to the forged works. This fact can be easily understood with the internal evidences. For example in Pulippani Vaidhyam, it has been mentioned under the Chapter ‘Nalyugangalin varalaru’ (The History of Four Yugas) that Boganathar lived during Dwarapayuga (i.e. 5105 YBP = Years Before Present), Pulippani 205 years after the starting of Kaliyuga (i.e. 3102 – 205 = 2897 BCE = Before Common Era) or 4899 YBP74. Similarly, the details found in the works attributed to Agasthiyar contain contradictory and non-verifiable data about the Yugas. Moreover, such details are not supported by any historical evidences. Therefore, the writers/composers of such works have purposely used the half-baked details of Yugas, the names and incidences of Itihasas and Puranas in the most assertive and authoritative tone and tenor to appear as if the works are authentic just to exhilarate, excite and inspire the readers. To take another example of a poem attributed to Tiruvalluvar, which runs as follows75:
“Calling the God Allah, folding their arms, worship saying –
‘Illallah’ and bending their bodies, and heads touching the ground.
Tell the message of God with the Cross, the Sutas,
Conquer through Spiritual propaganda, the Christians”
The conveyed meaning is self explanatory, but, during the period of Tiruvalluvar, there was no Christianity or Islam on the earth. Therefore, to what extent the forger could go could be known and understood by these forged, counterfeit and spurious works. In fact, it is a big literary and historical fraud to circulate such poems in the name of Tiruvalluvar or Tirumular.
Among the Rasavada literature also, the forged literature has been plenty. There are works with names – ‘The Book of the King’, ‘The Book of Mildness’, ‘The Book of Weight’, ‘The Book of Mercury’, ‘The Book of the 70′, ‘The Book of the 1200′ and so on attributed to Jabir ibn Hayyan/Jabar, Jibir/Geber/Jiyaber. These books contain the details about the preparation of elixir, conversion of Iron/Copper into Silver/Gold and so on. Till 1678, these were included in the Medical encyclopedias, reference books etc, attributed to Jabir ibn Hayyan. The French chemist Marcellin Berthelot (1826-1907), E. J. Holmyard, and Paul Kraus conclusively proved that these works were only Latin Geberian forgeries76. They were written after about 900 CE by the Arab religious sect called ‘Islamia’; took the name of Jabir and wrote these works from the ‘unknown’ sources! The existing works belong to 13th – 14th centuries. But, the scholars surprisingly, do not mention as to who actually wrote these works, which are the original source works, why they were written, when copied or adapted and adopted from ‘the originals’ or ‘unknown sources’, why such sources were not acknowledged, why the names of the original writers not mentioned. It is evident that the western and Arab/Muslim writers perhaps did not know the Siddhas and their works and therefore they could not relate the connection between them with the works. Those who read the existing works of Siddhas and the researchers on Siddhas could easily find out the similarity between the names of Siddhas and these forged works. Not only the names, even the poems, the methods mentioned to compose medicinal preparations, herbs/minerals used etc are very similar. Therefore, taking the accounts of sojourn of Siddhas to the Middle-eastern countries, it can easily be concluded that these works belong to Siddhas only. Such happenings could have taken place in historical settings in historical perspective as follows:
•§ As Indian works of Medicine, Astronomy, Astrology, Mathematics, etc, were translated into Arabic during the Abbasid period even by bringing the Indian Pundits/scholars from India, some Arabs must have written these works from the works of Siddhas.
•§ Adapting and adopting from the works of Siddhas, they must have been attributed to an Arabic scholar. Jabir ibn Hayyan is considered as ‘the first Sufi alchemist’. Therefore, his name must have been used by them for respect and popularity.
•§ The Siddhas who lived in the middle-east and got converted into Islam, might have written such works.
•§ As the episodes of conversion of Ramadeva and Bogar into Islam is mentioned, whether they were written by them is subjected to further critical study.
The scholars have mentioned the following details to the effect that:
•§ They say that the words al-kaya denote Alkalis/salts, segimen vitri to Carbonate of Soda, tutia to Copper Sulphate, al kuhl to finely ground grey Antomony ore etc.
•§ ‘al-iksir’ is nothing but Kayakalpam. The western scholars like George Lockmann forcefully try to derive the word from the Greek ‘gerion’, xerio = desiccative and Arabic ‘imam’ = the leader, they could not give proper and associated concepts and meanings. But, in Indian connotation, it is well known that ‘Kayakalpam’ is used for rejuvenation of the body or keeping the body young without aging.
•§ Moreover, the procedure prescribed, course explained and methodology used do not suit or match with their tradition, culture, heritage and civilization and such factors point to India.
Therefore, it is evident that either they would not have known the Siddhas and their works or knowingly they did not mention them with bias. The noting of Ajmalkhan77 can be quoted here – “The knowledge of chemistry must have gone from India to western countries. Siddhas Bogar and Ramadeva alias Yacob spread their works wherever they went. They visited Arabia, Turkey, China and other countries and had spread the Siddha medicinal practices”. Thus, these details constitute the first Siddha-Sufi dialogue taken place in the field of medicine.
A Note on Historiography of Medicine:
Rajesh Kochar78 has pointed out how the so-called European doctors were reportedly pampered by the Moghul rulers for their publicized cure of members of ‘royal families’ and getting ‘firmans’ for trade concessions including exemption from customs etc. However, he asserts as the ‘firmans’ are not there, the ‘miraculous cures of the doctors’ were publicized only by the British historians Thomas Bowrey and John Beard followed by Orme and Stewart. It has already been pointed out that the important fimans issued for the right of Madras given by Hindu Rajas on Gold were missing during 18th century itself. The Dutch, Danish and Portuguese always manipulated documents cheating the Hindu Dubash, merchants and Rajas. The best example is the exploitation of Naiks by them, getting permission from one Naik and doing business (here it includes everything – trade in goods and services, slaves and lunatics, etc.) in the territory of another. They ignore the Indian contribution all together, just by kicking the ladder after reaching the top. Therefore, in the historiography of medicine due acknowledgement should be given to Hindu doctors.
How Transmission taken place?
From the above, it is evident that the following were involved in handling Hindu books on Science and technology:
•§ European scholars, scientists, astronomers, botanists, Jesuits and other missionaries (here many times the so-called professionals themselves were Jesuits or missionaries or vice versa):
| Garcia d’Orta (1501-1568) | Nathaniel Wallich | Nevil Meskelyne |
| L’Ecluse | T. L. F. Folly | Antonio Rubino |
| Christovas da Casta | Andreas Betschler | Jean Venant Bouchet |
| Henrick Adrian Van Reede (1637-1691) | Carl Linnaeus | Fr. Richard |
| Johann Ernest Grundler (1677-1720) | Charles Curtis | Abraham Hyacinthe |
| Charles Clusius, Linchoten | Gancalco Fernandez | Antiquetil de Perron |
| Francis Xavier | Roberto de Nobili | Tycho Brahe |
| Parthalomius Ziegenbalg | Antonio Vici | Collin Mackanzie |
| Heinrich Plutschau | Balthasar da Costa | John Napier |
| John Fryer | Immanuel Martins | Joseph Constanzo Beschi |
| Samuel Brown | John de Britto | Pere Coeurdoux |
| James Petiver | Matteo Ricci | Etienne Souciet |
| Samuel Benjamin Cnoll | Christopher Clavius | Fr. De Bourzes |
| Johan Gerhard Koenig | Galileo Galeli | Julian Vinson |
| Cristoph Samuel John | Johannes Kepler | L. Besse |
| John Peter Rottler | Pope Gregory XIII | Francis Whyte Ellis |
| Gottfried Klien | Simon de la Loubere | C. T. Edward Rhenius |
| Benjamin Hayne | Isaac Newton | G. U. Pope |
| Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz | Robert Caldwell | |
| Nicolas Luis de la Caille | ||
| Leonard Euler | ||
| La Gentil |
•§ Hindu Scholars, Scribes, Dubash, Teachers, Doctors, engaged by the Europeans:
| Vairaventa Guru (Ziegan balg) | Siva Dharma (Nobili) | Ranga Bhatta(van Rheede) |
| Pancaccara Guru (Z) | Brahmin of Trivalore (la Gentil) | Vinayaka Bhatta (R) |
| Mapillai Guru (Z) | Supradipa Kavirayar (Beschi) | Apu Deva (R) |
| Sena Sastri (Z) | Siddhanta Pandaram (B) | Kolattuvaidhyan (R) |
| Minakshi Sastri (Z) | Arumuga Navalar | Manuel Carner (R) |
| Citampara Sastri (Z) | Muthusamy Pillai (Ellis) | Many un-named, unknown, Tamil scholars, Pundits, Doctors, Pandarams, Siddhas, etc. |
| Mokampara Sastri (Z) | Vedanayaga Sastry (Mackazie) | |
| 70 years old Tamil teacher(name not mentioned) (Z) | Kalangiraya Pillai (Kappal satram) | |
| Alappan / Azhagappan (Z) | ||
| Ganpathy Upadhyata (1670-1710)(Z) | ||
| his father-a Pandit(name not mentioned)(Z) | ||
| Arumugam / Aaron (Z) | ||
•§ Eliminating the persons who did not come to India, short-listed from sr.no.1 is as follows:
| Garcia d’Orta (1501-1568) | Johan Gerhard Koenig | Simon de la Loubere |
| L’Ecluse | Cristoph Samuel John | Nicolas Luis de la Caille |
| Christovas da Casta | John Peter Rottler | La Gentil |
| Henrick Adrian Van Reede(1637-1691) | Gottfried Klien | Antonio Rubino |
| Johann Ernest Grundler (1677-1720) | Benjamin Hayne | Jean Venant Bouchet |
| Charles Clusius, Linchoten | Nathaniel Wallich | Fr. Richard |
| Francis Xavier | T. L. F. Folly | Abraham HyacintheAntiquetil de Perron |
| Parthalomius Ziegenbalg | Andreas Betschler | Collin Mackanzie |
| Heinrich Plutschau | Charles Curtis | Joseph Constanzo Beschi |
| John Fryer | Gancalco Fernandez | Pere Coeurdoux |
| Samuel Brown | Roberto de Nobili | Francis Whyte Ellis |
| James Petiver | Antonio Vici | C. T. Edward Rhenius |
| Samuel Benjamin Cnoll | Balthasar da Costa | G. U. Pope |
| Immanuel Martins | Robert Caldwell | |
| John de Britto | ||
| Matteo Ricci |
•§ The persons who claimed that they could read / write / speak Tamil and Collectors:
| Barthalomeous Ziegenbalg | La Gentil | Francis Whyte Ellis |
| Gancalco Fernandez | Antonio Rubino | C. T. Edward Rhenius |
| Roberto de Nobili | Jean Venant Bouchet | G. U. Pope |
| Balthasar da Costa | Collin Mackanzie | Robert Caldwell |
| Immanuel Martins | Joseph Constanzo Beschi | |
| John de Britto |
Thus, the short listed persons are all members of Society of Jesus (Catholics) and missionaries (Protestants). The European companies had significantly helped them in many aspects – shipping them from Europe to Indian destinations safely and transporting them back or their collection from Indian destinations to European ones. Here, perhaps the European pirates had also worked together or had some sort covenant not to attack the ‘Christian priests’, that too with ‘heathen books’ and ‘goods of gentility’. Anyway the transmission had taken place and such process is depicted figuratively as follows:
| European countriesóVatican |
| Goa,CochinCeylonMadras |
| TranquebarCeylon (via)Batavia Cophenhagen |
| GoaLisbonVatican |
| PulicatMadrasCeylonHolland |
The transmission of Hindu palm-leaf books, charts, maps, tables, pictures, instruments, specimens, samples, medicines, formulations etc.
Conclusion:
Diseases are the culmination of mind due to bad or inhuman thinking processes. Such thinking vibrations affect all neurons and cells – the factories inside and thus disturbing the activities of secretion, production and replenishment of cells etc. The health-keeping neuron is greater than the cells. That is why Hindus want to safeguard neurons always, as they know that body would take care of itself. Here come the Samskaras with rituals and mantras. The bodily diseases only could be cured with medicines. That is why Hindus related them to ‘Tridosha’ and ‘Panchbhuta tatva’. Theologically, also, they believed such nature given elements should go back to nature, thus following the rituals of ‘Five Elements’ eve during death. But, the west always wanted and wants to pose differently. They not only grabbed the knowledge of Siddhas, but want to be ‘Siddhas’, by burying their bodies.
Western scientists while suppressing the fact of deriving much of their fundamental knowledge from India, accuse that Indians have no proof for their claimed excellence or antiquity of sciences. It has to be mentioned that Indians had already tested the microcosm and thus presented the tested facts in the macrocosm for the use of humanity, but the westerners, no doubt in the urge of finding truth took Indian sciences, tested in their laboratories, converted technical name in Latin, proposed new hypotheses and theories with Latin and Greek terminology. In every subject, they have gone into – breaking matter to find out atomic (John Dalton 1766-1844) and sub-atomic particles (J. J. Thompson 1856-1940), analyzing the molecules of gases (Gay-Lussac 1778-1850) and liquids (Robert Brownian 1773-1858), probing into germs (Louis Pasteur 1822-1895, J. J. Lister 1827-1912), bacteria, virus, germs; cells in plants, animals and human-beings, classification of them (Linneaus, G. J. Mendel 1822-1884), circulation of blood (William Harvey 1578-1657) and so on. Take any science, their discoveries or claimed inventions are only in 18th-19th centuries, after their ‘comfortable’ association with, derivation of and consummation with India. Getting goods and services from India – searching for India – getting goods manufactured and exported to their countries from India – taking science and technology with samples and books to Europe – getting revolutionalized suddenly – all clearly proves the fact.
Thus, it may be noted that much of the western science and technology has been developed and established only after 19th-20th centuries. That too, they required ‘revolution’ for such things to happen. They assert that the so-called Industrial revolution happened in the late 18th and beginning of 19th centuries. They were using only wooden instruments and machines till late 18th and early 19th centuries and then only they switched over to metal, as they could learn the working of metals only thereafter. But note that Indians were using machines, of course made of stone, wood and metal, but could export textiles, medicine and food items to Europe till 19th century. This was possible, only due to the naturalized adoption of sciences. But, the westerners want to exploit nature. Here only Hindus/Indians differed and still differ. Just because of westernized or industrialized ‘mass-production’, the Indian concept of ‘production-by-mass’ cannot be belittled.
In medicine, they could achieve processes which could diagnose, administer, operate and heal quickly. Indians too adopted such methods only in ultimate conditions and not as prescribed or routine way. They considered the human body as the best example where all biological, physical, chemical and other activities are going on in thousands of in-built-factories, laboratories, workshops and R & D divisions. If mind and body are kept in consonance with nature with purity, the in-built factories would care of everything. This is now studied under Bio-physics, Bio-Chemistry, Bio-Technology, Genetics, etc. The EIC ironically ordered to close down all Siddha and Ayurvedic works and factories stealing the technology. Passing one Act after the other (Medical Acts from the respective regions), it banned Indian doctors, midwives, compounders and all connected people. Finally, it gave a death blow to Indian medicine by introducing Poisonous Act. Definitely, it was a poisonous Act for Indian Medicine, particularly Siddha system dealing with medicinal preparations with salts, metals, metallic poisons and combination thereof. They activated European intellectuals to write against their practices creating a bad impression so that Indians themselves feel ashamed of their ‘Medicinal system’.
About the Author:
The author is an independent researcher.
E-mail: kopallerao@yahoo.co.uk
Notes and References:
•1. C. K. Raju, Cultural Foundations of Mathematics, Oxford University Press, New Delhi, Aryabhata Group, ‘Transmission of Calculus from Kerala to Europe’, a paper presented during the International Colloquium of Aryabhata held at Thiruvananthapuram.
•2. His articles could be seen in the ‘Bulletin of the Indian Institute of History of Medicine’, Hyderabad; the Indian Journal of Venereal Diseases etc.
•3. K. V. Ramakrishna Rao, Saltpetre, ‘The British and the Missionaries’, a paper presented at the 12th session of Tamilnadu History Congress held at Mayiladhurai from September 30th to October 2nd 2005.
•4. ‘The Scientific Pursuits of Roberto de Nobili (1577-1656) in the Tamilagam’, a paper presented at the 25th session of South Indian History Congress, held at Madurai from January 20-22, 2005.
•5. ‘When a French Astronomer Learnt Astronomy in Tamilnadu’, a paper presented during a seminar ‘Contribution of Tribals of Tamilnadu’ held at Madras from June 17th to 18th, 2006 at Meenakshi college (to appear in the proceedings).
•6. ‘European Scientists: Indian Chronology and Historiography’, XXth Session of South Indian History Congress held at Tiruvananthapuram from Feb 25-27, 2002.
‘The Interest of European Scientists in Indian Chronology and Historiography’, UGC Seminar on Situating Historical Writings in Post-Independence India (Abstracts volume), held at Bharathidasan University on March 23 & 23, 2002, Tiruchirappalli, pp.16-17.
‘The Interest of European Scientists in Indian Calendar and Chronology’, in ‘Indian Calendar and Chronology’ (Seminar papers) held at Central Mining Research Institute, Dhanbad on August 9 & 10, 2003, pp.1-20.
•7. ‘The Other Side of the Great Arc’ – The Great Trigonometrical Survey Conducted, a paper presented at the 24th session of SIHC held at Calicut from February 16-18, 2004.
•8. The works of Tamil Siddhar have been published by different publishers, but each work differs from others in many aspects: (i) No. of songs vary attributed to each Siddha, (ii) the no. of Siddhas themselves vary, (iii) There have been many spelling mistakes found in the verses. Many words in the songs compiled also differ, (iv) there have been many spurious works circulated with the names of “Agastiyar”, “Sivavakkiyar”, “Valluvar” and so on.
•9. Robert Sewell, a Forgotten Empire.
•10. V. V. S. Sastry, Hortus Indicus Malabaricus (Garden of Malabar of India), Bulletin of the Indian Institute of Medicine, Vol. V, No.3, July 1975, pp.143-149.
•11. George Oomen and Hans Raun Iversen (Edrs.), ‘It Began in Copenhagen’, ISPCK, New Delhi, 2005.
•12. E. Arno Lehmann, ‘It Began at Tranquebar’, CLS, Madras, 2006.
•13. http://www.francke-halle.de – An article ‘A Boon for Researchers’ in ‘The Hindu’ (Jan. 23, 2006) claims that digitized form of all palm-leaf books taken by Ziegenbalg is available for researchers, but only partial list is available. No digitized palm-leaf books are available for reading when accessed.
•14. James Petiver, ‘An Account of Some Indian Plants’, in Philosophical Transactions of Royal Society of London, Vol. XX, p.313, 1698.
•15. Samuel Benjamin Snoll, ‘Titera autographica Tranqvebaria Indorum orientalium Fridericopolim Norvegiae missae de borracis artificiali commpositione’, Acta Medica Hafniensis, 1753, pp.64-66.
•16. The formation of it is mentioned in ‘A Sketch of the History of Indian Botany’ in http:// www.wgbis.ces.iisc.ernet.in/biodiversity/documents/botanical.htm
•17. Johan Gergard Koenig, ‘Doctor Koenigs reise fra Trankebar til Zeylon’, in Videnskabernes Selskabs Skrifier, Copenhagen, 1779, Part. XII, pp. 383-402. http://www.nationalherbarium.nl/fmcollectors.htm; Ralph R. Stewart, ‘Missionaries and Clergymen as Botanists in India and Pakistan’, Taxon, Vol. 31, No. 1, February, 1982, pp. 57-64.
•18. W. Boxburgh, ‘A Botanical and Economic Account of Bassia Butyracea, or East India Butter Tree’, Asiatic Researches, Vol. 8, pp. 499-510, 1809.
•19. Dr. Vijay Bedekar, Indian Contribution to World Civilization, in his inaugural speech see: http:// www.orientalthane.com/speeches/speech2005.htm. Interestingly, a Mackanzie manuscript no. 59 (D.3082), “Pazhaverkadu Kaipidhu” (A Detailed Note on Pulicat) contains details of different types of fish / species, their characters, figures, the time of catch etc. But, nothing is mentioned about C. S. John’s collection.
•20. Ibid.
•21. K. M. Mathew ‘Notes on Botanical Trips (1799-1800) of J. P. Rottler on the Coromandel Coast (India) with a translation of his Original Text, Explanatory Notes and a Map’, in Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, Vol. 113, 1993, pp. 351-388.
•22. W. Roxburgh, opt.cit.
•23. http://www.nationalherbarium.nl/fmcollectors/H/HeyneB.htm
•24. http://www.nationalherbarium.nl/fmcollectors/N/Wallich.htm
•25. Niklas Thode Jensen, ‘The Medical Skills of the Malabar Doctors in Tranquebar, India as recorded by T. L. F. Folly’, 1798, in http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1251641
•26. Ibid. Mercury was in demand in Europe itself during the material period. Therefore, enticing with Hg is interesting and intriguing. The Europeans were using Mercuric preparations; indiscriminately killing many patients suffering from syphilis. Thus, they were desperate in getting the Indian medicine at any cost.
•27. Goncalco Fernandez, ‘On Indian Heathenism’, translated by Ines G. Zupanov, Portugal Indico, Brown University, 2003.
•28. Robert W. Wink (Ed.), Historiography, Vol. V of ‘Oxford History of the British Empire’, 1999, USA, p.197
•29. Niklas Thode Jenson, opt.cit. In foot note no.80, he records as follows: “This remark can be found only in Folly’s original manuscript (Royal library catalogue number: Add.761 e40) and not in the copy made at the Royal Academy of Surgeons in Copenhagen (Royal library catalogue number: Add 333a Fol.)”
•30. Samuel Hugh Moffett, ‘A History of Christianity in Asia’, Orbis Books, USA, Vol. II: 1500 to 1900, 2005, pp.242-243. See the chapter 11 under “Hidden Seed”: The Moravians in India (1760-1803).
•31. G. Samuel Iyer, ‘History of Tranquebar Mission AD 1706-1955′, Tranquebar Printing & Publishing House, Madras, 1955, p.36.
•32. European doctors were treating the syphilis patients very badly. The sores were burned with hot iron rods and so on. When they learned about Hindu treatment, they would have decided to bring the patients for treatment and also tried to get full technique of cure from the Hindu doctors at any cost.
•33. K. V. Ramakrishna Rao, ‘When a French Astronomer Learnt Astronomy in Tamilnadu’, opt.cit.
•34. J. E. Hutton, ‘The History of Moravian Missions’, London, 1812.
•35. P. Maria Lazar, ‘Moravians in Tranquebar (1760-1803)’, http://www.trankebar.net/article/moravian-uk.htm
•36. DW, The Transmission of Indian Medicine to Other Cultures, http://www.ucl.ac.uk/histmed/PDFS/Teaching/ BSc/C123-Lecture10b.pdf
•37. Carolus Linnaeus, Flora Zeylanica sistens plantas Indicas Zeylonae Insulae, quae olim 1670-1677, Amnsterdem
•38. William A. R. Thomson (ed.), ‘Healing Plants-A Modern Herbal’, MacMillan London Ltd, UK, 1978, p.10.
•39. The incidences leading to disappearance or Jivasamadhi of Sadasiv Brimendrar and Ramalinga Adigal have been mysterious and not yet solved. These remarks are made not to hurt the feelings of devotees of the Saints, but to point out the puzzling situation around the incidences taken place – A Mohammedan cutting off hand of Sadasiv Brimendrar and a Christian threatening Ramalinga Adigal with an iron rod, when he refused to teach Rasavada.
•40. Vaccination – Vatican’s Medical Inquisition Revealed at Last! at http://www.reformation.org/vaccine.html
•41. Vasco-da-Gama brought Syphilis in Calicut and tried to cure it by worshipping at a Hindu temple. But the Church historians have written in such a way that when he landed, there was already a Church, where Christians were praying to Mary. Thus, Syphilis exposes many tricks played by the Jesuits in Indian history.
•42. His biographers point out that he was working as a “doctor” without basic qualifications. He got elected to the “Royal Society” by submitting a paper on ‘The Nesting Habits of the Cuckoo’ and became Dr. Jenner in 1790, by buying a Medical Degree from the University of St. Andrew for the sum of 15 pounds. He tried his vaccination with children and boys, who were dead by TB. In 1797, his paper was rejected by the Society with a warning that, “He had better not promulgate such a wild idea if he valued his reputation”. However, he published his book in 1798 and got honorary MD degree from the Oxford in 1813. (These details are pointed out to show the way in which the westerners wrote on India, and not to discredit any scientist or scholar.)
•43. J. Z. Holwell, ‘An Account of the Manner of Inoculating for the Smallpox in the East Indies’, London, 1767. The paper is available (see: Dharmpal) ‘Indian Science and Technology in the Eighteenth Century: Some Contemporary European Accounts’, New Delhi, 1971, pp.143-163.
•44. American Medical Association, ‘History of Inoculation & Vaccination’, Lecture Memoranda, Burroughs Wellcome & Co, London & New York, 1913, p. 18.
•45. J. Z. Holwell, opt.cit.
•46. Domink Wujastayk, ‘A Pious Fraud: The Indian Claim for pre-Jennerian Smallpox Vaccination’, in Studies on Indian Medical History, Egbert Forsten, Groningen, 1987, The Netherlands (Dutch), pp.131-167.
•47. Collection of Sir George Ballinggall (1780-1855), in the Wellcome Institute for the History of Medicine (Western MS, 6905).
•48. The misinterpretation in converting “Mari” to “Mary” has already been mentioned. Ironically, his landing of 500th year was celebrated forgetting his introduction of syphilis in Calicut!
•49. Julius Jolly, ‘Indian Medicine’, Mushilal Manoharlal, New Delhi, 1977, p.3, pp.128-129. Bhavaprakasa was written by Bhavamisra, a famous physician of Banaras. Another work Cobacini prakasa on Cobacini (Sarasaparilla) as a remedy against syphilis and other diseases compiled under the auspices of Ranjit Singh.
•50. S. P. Ramachandran (Pub.), ‘Bogar 7000 (Seventh Canto)’, Tamarai Nulagam, Madras, 1991.
•51. D. V. Subba Reddy, ‘Charles Curtis on Diseases of India in the Fleet and Naval Hospital at Madras in 1782 and 1783′, BIIHM, Hyderabad, Vol. IV, No. 3 & 4, July & Oct. 1974, pp.193-207.
•52. ‘Documenta Indica’, Vol. III, p.307. Vincent Cronin also records his interest in Indian astronomy, discussion of Kepler Laws with Indian astronomers etc.
•53. Kepler’s fabrication – see the following: ‘Planet fakery exposed falsified data: Johannes Kepler’, The Times, London, January 25, 1990, 31a, including large excerpts from the article by – William J. Broad, ‘After 400 years, a challenge to Kepler; he fabricated his data, scholars say’, New York Times January 23, 1990, C1, 6. The key article is Willliam Donahue, ‘Kepler’s fabricated figures: Covering up the mess in the New Astronomy’, Journal for the History of Astronomy, 19 (1988), p.217-37.
•54. Henry Benard, ‘Matteo Ricci’s Scientific Contribution to China’, Hyperion Press, Westport, Conn, 1973, p.38
•55. http://www.faculty.fairfield.edu/imac/sj/scientists/clavius.htm
•56. M. Labbe, J. E. Darrae, ‘A General History of the Catholic Church’, USA, 1868, Vol. III, p.307.
•57. Ibid, pp. 234-235.
•58. John Playfair, ‘Some Remarks on Astronomy of Brahmins’, Edinburgh, 1789.
•59. K. V. Ramakrishna Rao, ‘Why computers should work only on 0 and 1′, in ‘Vedic Sciences’ (Proceedings of Vishwa Veda Vijnana Satram), 2005, p.364.
•60. The urge to acquire Indian sciences and as well as the Clavius-Maestlin controversy made the Jesuits desperate in stealing all the manuscripts to prove the authenticity i.e. the mathematical and astronomical basis. See, Chapter One, ‘Establishing Mathematical Authority: The Politics of Christoph Clavius’, pp.15-48. www.stanford.edu/~mgorman/thesis/chapter1.pdf; Roger Ariew, ‘Theory of Comets at Paris during the seventeenth century’, in Journal of the History of Ideas, Vol. 53, No. 3 (Jul. – Sep., 1992), pp. 355-372. Francis Johnson, ‘Marlowe’s Astronomy and Renaissance Skepticism’, ELH, Vol. 13, No. 4 (Dec., 1946), pp. 241-254.
•61. Fr. Buccerio’s account of Madurai Mission to the Jesuit General Aquaviva 3 October, 1610 (this is appended to ‘Atma Nirnayam’, a work attributed to Nobili).
•62. K. V. Ramakrishna Rao, opt.cit, The Interest of European Scientists… on Antonio Rubino.
•63. Antotio Rubino, ‘Account of the History and Religion of Vijayanagara (1608)’, Atchv fur Religionsgeschichte, Vol.3, 2001, pp.210-256.
•64. R. K. Kochar, ‘Secondary Tools of Empire: Jesuit Men of Science in India’, in Discoveries, Missionary Expansions and Asian Cultures, Concept Publishing Co., New Delhi, pp.175-183.
•65. For details see ‘Preface by Tycho Brahe to the noblest emperor Rudolph the 2nd‘, in http:// www.asu.cas.cz~had/tychpref.html
•66. L. Besse, ‘Father Beschi of the Society of Jesus, His Times & Writings’, St. Joseph Industrial School Press, 1916. This book gives the complex version of the controversial nature of Beschi based on letters of missionaries. About controversies like his arrest and release, polemics with Tranquebar Protestants writing many Tamil works engaging Tamil Pandarams and poets give mosaic picture.
•67. Julien Vinson, ‘Manuel de la Langue Tamoule’, p. xxv (quoted in the above boon on pages 181-182).
•68. L. Besse, opt.cit, pp. 232-240 and 245-246.
•69. V. M. Gnanapragasam, ‘Beschi and Inculturation’, in Jesuit presence in Indian History, edited by Anand Amaladas, Gujarat Sahitya Prakash, Anand, 1988, p.176.
•70. The discussion is made on the details given L. Besse in his book on the topic ‘Tirucabai Kanitham’ in appendices.
•71. George Byran Souza ‘The French Connection: Indian Cottons, their Early Modern Technology and Diffusion’
•72. Tirumantiram – 231, 240, 241, 242, 247, 515-519.
•73. P. V. Namasivaya Mudaliyar, ‘The Coronation Dictionary’, Chennai, 1911, p.938. K. V. Ramakrishna Rao, ‘A Critical Study of Siddhas and Sufis in Historical Perspective’ (in Tamil); in Ayvarangak Kovai (Proceedings of the First Islamic Tamil Literary Conference), Sri Lanka, 2002, pp. 360-382. ‘A Critical Study of Siddhas and Sufis in Historical Perspective’, All India Oriental Conference, 2002, p.256.
•74. S. P. Ramachandran (Pub), ‘Pulippani Vaidhyam’, Tamarai Nulagam, Chennai.
•75. S. Kalyanaraman, ‘Tiruvalluvar Carittira Maruttuva Araycikkathir (Siddhar Marabu)’, Chennai, 1972, pp.171-172.
•76. George Lockemann, ‘The Story of Chemistry’, Philosophical Library, U.S.A, 1959, pp.30-31.
•77. P. M. Ajmal khan and M. M. Vuwais, ‘Islamiya Tamil Ilakkiya Varalaru’, Vol. IV ‘Sufi Meignana Ilakkiyangal’, Madurai Kamaraj University, 1997.
•78. Rajesh Kochar, ‘The Truth behind the Legend: European doctors in pre-colonial India’, in http://www.ias.in/jbiosci/september1999/article2.htm
A Crisis of Confidence, Apathy, and Neglect Threatens the Survival
Dr. Laul Jadusingh
It would not be inaccurate to say that a crisis exists in contemporary Indian self-consciousness that is injurious to the collective self-esteem of India as a society at large and disempowering to the national will and self-confidence in multiple ways. This crisis is eminently amenable to an intellectual solution but requires a synergetic effort on a national and cultural scale that involves a re-evaluation of attitudes negligent of, ignorant of, and even deprecatory of the traditional knowledge systems of India, specifically those that pre-date the Muslim and British occupation and rule.
It is a great wonder that so much of our millennial intellectual heritage survives to the present, and this itself is proof of the vitality, relevance, and applicability of traditional knowledge originating in India and preserved there or abroad. However, the mere existence of this body of knowledge, and the practical methods and methodologies to perpetuate it, is insufficient in an atmosphere where traditional knowledge—broad in scope and comprehensive of all human concerns—is neglected and under-appreciated by large sectors of the Indian intelligentsia. This neglect is reflected at a policy level, especially in education, where Western paradigms, disciplines, and methods predominate, reducing much of our traditional knowledge to second-hand status.
The remediation of this requires vigorous efforts to be undertaken by practically all levels of Indian society, but especially in government policy to reform and re-vision the educational system. This reform must incorporate the traditional sciences, arts, and literature in a rigorous way, with emphasis on their contemporary applicability and relevance. In practically all fields—from psychology to medicine, from economics and politics to arts and literature, philosophy, and religion—abundant intellectual capital exists within Indian knowledge systems to encompass all human concerns. These systems have embedded within them practical methodologies that are being earnestly studied and exploited by non-Indians for enlightenment and profit, yet largely neglected by Indians.
It is patent that an attitudinal problem is largely responsible for this neglect. But this is not merely an issue of cultural pride or national self-consciousness; it is the potential loss of knowledge that is capable of uplifting Indian society through intellectual enlightenment, political sophistication, and practical solutions that can yield benefits on broad fronts within India and internationally.
Not unimportant is the potential economic benefit that may derive from the preservation, propagation, and research and development of products that should be valued as the common intellectual property of Indian society. Indians should beware lest their intellectual heritage primarily serves to enlighten and profit others. Some may object that it is illegitimate to assert intellectual property rights to knowledge that is of such universal scope and application, or that the survivability of traditional knowledge systems can best be facilitated by the rigorous academic disciplines developed in the West.
However, if the Indian intelligentsia cedes this trust to others, the irreparable loss will be for our culture, national self-esteem, and profit. Non-Indians have already marginalized Indians in the academic fields dealing with Indic studies in practically every area. Indians who object to whatever bias, distortions, and misrepresentations they perceive in the factual content, exegesis, evaluation, or methodology of Western academics are ignored or vilified, and whatever their learning or expertise might be in their traditional knowledge systems, their competence is questioned.
The ongoing and accelerating co-option of the discipline of hatha-yoga, and the certification of teachers by mostly non-Indians in the U.S.A. in particular, should be of concern to Indians who value their religious and cultural heritage. This phenomenon entails not merely intellectual loss but economic loss, as Indians seem willing to passively yield the teaching and practice of this discipline to others while doggedly pursuing Western disciplines, many of which are rapidly incorporating elements of yoga, meditation, and Indian philosophy. Ayurveda is another field where Indians are yielding both teaching and profit to others.
Beyond a campaign to preserve, propagate, and economically exploit for the national and cultural self-interest the traditional knowledge on its own terms, another more concerted intellectual effort is required in Indian academia and formulated in government policy. This effort entails the study of traditional knowledge systems with an emphasis on contemporary relevance, further research, and development.
The Philosophical Sophistication of Indic Thought: Yoga and Phenomenology
In the philosophical and ideological sphere, traditional Indian philosophy, for instance, having thoroughly debated the questions of evolutionism/creationism in terms remarkably parallel to the contemporary debate, can contribute much to the vexed and acrimonious dialogue between advocates of Darwinian evolutionary theory, the scientific orthodoxy, and a resurgent Christian fundamentalism insistent on the literal account of the creation myth of Genesis or the pseudo-scientific theory of Intelligent Design. These efforts are meant to reconcile the two views.
It is instructive that traditional Indian philosophies can offer well-developed theistic creationist accounts of the origin and destiny of the cosmos, as well as non-theistic accounts broadly evolutionist in character. The special virtue of the Indian systems in general is the formulation of evolutionist views which do not marginalize the role of consciousness, but rather advocate the primacy of consciousness while recognizing the circumscription of mind in embodiment.
The ancient and seminal Sankhya system is arguably a perfect model in this regard: pure abstract consciousness, self-illuminating and self-perceptive, is reflected in primordial nature composed of the equilibrium of the three basic properties of clarity-balance (sattva), motility (rajas), and inertia (tamas). Disturbing the equilibrium occasions the combination and permutations of atoms of the basic elements to produce conditions favorable for the evolution of organic and non-organic entities, including higher life forms of human and animal life. The pure consciousness is not essentially involved in matter, but its reflection therein is sufficient to produce a semblance of consciousness with the development of a highly organized hierarchy of mental and supramental faculties.
Another virtue of this view is that the three basic properties aforementioned are neither categorically material nor mental, thus avoiding the dichotomy of mind and matter fundamental to Western worldviews, scientific or otherwise. In the Sankhya system, intelligence (buddhi), mind (manas), and individuality (ahamkara) are integral aspects of nature, not epi-phenomenal. Evolution proceeds as long as the pure consciousness (purusha) is ignorant of its independence from nature (prakriti), but ceases for the individual purusha when recognition of its true nature as distinct from the mind-nature nexus takes place.
The Sankhya view affords some remarkable parallels to current scientific and empirical views, cosmological and evolutionary. It has its own version of the singularity principle in the involvement of purusha with prakriti, though this singularity is ontological rather than chronological. The pseudo-involvement of purusha with prakriti may also be construed as a version of the so-called anthropic principle, the contemporary cosmologist’s non-theistic substitute for a creator god. In common with all main Indian systems, Sankhya is stereological in orientation, i.e., it envisions the “summum bonum” as kaivalya, freedom from all limitations incurred by involvement with the body-mind, hence nature. Its ontology, epistemology, and psychology are broadly scientific or proto-scientific in analytical, empirical, and naturalistic orientation.
Broader Scope of Indic Philosophy
Though there are many intriguing parallels between Indic and Western systems of thought, it would be inaccurate and presumptuous to assert any complete isomorphism. While there are abstract and conceptual similarities, mainly in ontological and epistemological theory, there are significant divergences in goals, methodology, and pedagogy. Even systems such as the phenomenology of Husserl, which purport to have developed a comprehensive epistemology and ontology adequate to ground all knowledge and experience and rigorous enough to meet the empirical demands of experimental science, are lacking in an adequate praxis whereby their declared goal—achieving absolutely presuppositionless knowledge prior to conceptualization and verbalization—can be realized.
The decidedly intellectualistic orientation of contemporary Western philosophy, including phenomenology, precludes their investigative methodology from conducting penetrative analyses of sufficient depth to reveal the ground of essential being. This is the stated goal of Husserl’s phenomenology, namely, to reveal the ground of being in an unsynthetic act of consciousness called the primordial dator intuition. This is reminiscent of Dharmakirti’s definition of direct cognition (pratyaksha) as “kalpanaapodha-abhrantam-abhilapa-samsarga-ayogya-pratitih”, exclusive of conceptualization and incapable of coalescing with verbalization—the main difference being that Dharmakirti’s emphasis is more epistemological, while Husserl’s is more ontological.
The crucial difference between Western systems such as phenomenology and the Indic systems grounded in yoga is not that the former is mainly theoretical and philosophical, and the latter more mystical and pragmatic, as often asserted. The Indic systems have, in addition to adequate ontology and epistemology, a yoga practice by which the goal of omniscience and liberation—their main stereological goals—are realized. Rigorous logic and epistemology (pramana) are integral aspects of the Indic systems, but their aim is to transcend the intellect after exhaustive analyses, thereby realizing the very unsynthetic consciousness to which the phenomenologist aspires.
Many presuppositions hobble Western systems, rendering them incapable of transcending certain conceptual and methodological dilemmas, including: Judeo-Christian theological dogmas that insist on the incapacity of man to achieve omniscience and divinity; the dualism of matter and mind; and the Kantian denial that human knowledge can ever directly know the noumenon, the realm of essences, which is in principle unknowable and only indirectly intuitable.
The yogi’s presuppositions and goals are the inverse of these. For the yogi, true and objective knowledge can only be achieved in the transcendence of the subject-object dichotomy. The enlightened one can definitely realize omniscience and divinity, and all yogic practice is informed by this confidence. The phenomenologist program of phenomenological reduction—in three stages: epoch, eidetic reduction, and transcendental reduction—suspends the natural attitude and naive conventions of belief and perception to reveal the ground of being in a primordial dator intuition. This is roughly equivalent to the yoga’s three final stages (angas) of dharana, dhyana, and samadhi, wherein the object of meditation is revealed in its true objectivity, and the subject-seer manifests its naked awareness.
Whereas in yoga epistemology, the conclusion entailed by the coincidence, equivalence, and non-duality of subject and object is acceptable within its presuppositions, the phenomenologist followers of Husserl were reluctant to admit it as it verged on mysticism. In the yogic theory, by contrast, the only acceptable conclusion is that true objectivity is non-dual.
A Unified Theory of Knowledge Comports Well With Insights of Indic Thought
The trend in scientific epistemology is to arrive at a unified theory of knowledge. In practically all contemporary fields, this goal is either explicitly articulated or implicitly adumbrated. The prevailing scientific paradigm, informed by the Cartesian mind-body, observer-observed duality, is now universally acknowledged as inadequate and obsolete, incapable of accounting for the subtle material quantum realm as well as the varieties of consciousness.
Though challenged by discoveries in quantum theory and paradigm shifts such as the Heisenberg uncertainty principle, the Cartesian paradigm continues to be the fundamental operative assumption of scientific epistemology and positivist empiricism. Millennia in advance of these developments, Indian thought not only propounded a wide variety of atomic theories but also questioned the very validity of an indivisible atomic unit, favoring instead theories of probability and indeterminism, as in the Jaina tenet of syad-vada and anekatva-vada, and the Buddhist concepts of radical flux, insubstantiality, emptiness, and relativity (sunyata), multi-linear, reciprocal, and contingent causation (pratitya-samutpada).
The dialectical logic of Nagarjuna and his Madhyamaka successors, which exposed the dilemmas inherent in all theoretical constructs and thereby demonstrated the a priori relativity of all concepts and theories, was complemented by a critical theory of cognition formulated in the theory of three perceptual natures (tri-svabhava): the constructed (parikalpita), contingent-reciprocal (paratantra), and veridical (parinishpanna) of the Yogachara school of Vasubandhu and Asanga, providing a framework for a comprehensive epistemology.
A pivotal development with profound implications for ontology, epistemology, and pedagogy is the positing of two levels of truth: relative-conventional (samvritti) and ultimate (paramartha), an originally Buddhist concept adopted with varying degrees of explicitness by all stereologically oriented systems of India. As a pedagogical device (upaya), it facilitated targeted graduated discourse (anupurvika katha) directed to different mentalities, intellectual abilities, and aptitudes. As a principle of structural ontology, it provided the framework for the coincidence of ontological monism and epistemological relativism.
The traditional arts and literature, with its aesthetic theory of nine tastes/moods (navarasa/bhava), is another area in which traditional Indian knowledge systems arguably provide inspiration for a unifying aesthetic paradigm of universal applicability.
It is incumbent on Indian intellectuals to more stridently advocate the relevance, contemporaneity, and applicability of the holistic principles and ethos which preponderantly inform Indic thought in areas not exclusively religious or mystical, on an international scale. This is not merely possible but highly feasible, given the emerging global holistic paradigm, already influenced by Indic thought. In this way, Indic thought may reclaim the prominence it deserves, and the intellectual life of the world may be immeasurably enriched. The implication of these Indic concepts and their time-tested methodologies for an emerging holistic worldview should not be underestimated.
The coincidence of ideological, political, and economic factors favors a more proactive attitude; the historical and psychological moments have coalesced. There is an element of Manifest Destiny in this advocacy, but this is not foreign to our outlook or incompatible with our values. The recognition that our millennial culture and civilization has much to contribute to humanity is attested by the missionary initiatives of Ashoka and Vivekananda.
The contemporary nuance in this new advocacy must emphasize not merely the religious and mystical aspects of Indic thought, but also its rational and conceptual elements. Competent and articulate exponents should make the case that there is an essentially scientific approach in traditional knowledge systems encompassing philosophy and religion, arts and sciences. We should not be timid in asserting that our shastras employ broadly scientific methodologies.
Ideologically, however, Hindutva must not be narrowly construed: all our Dharmic traditions must be represented and integrated in order to thematically present the insights and intellectual achievements of Indian civilization effectively in a contemporary context.
In our pride of accomplishment, a bit of chauvinism may be unavoidable, but if we take to heart the excellent advice of the great Madhyamaka philosopher Chandrakirti, we are likely to maintain a balanced attitude:
“The intelligent person should accept whatever he sees as well explained from whatever source, by thinking of it as his own. Such truth does not abide exclusively with anyone, since it is equally objective for all, and since it is free from attachment and aversion, as sunlight, for instance, works impersonally for everyone with sight.” (Chatushataka 12, ad.k.300)
If this universalism and essentially scientific perspective informs our outlook, we are unlikely to falter.
Astrology Is Prominent and Primitive of All the Sciences
Dr.Bhawaan B.R.V Tatavarthy
[Ref: Call for Papers and Participation in a Seminar titled “Restoration of Traditional Knowledge Systems and Reforming the Educational System.”]
This is an attempt to focus on some of the fundamental ideas based on which scientific postulates are formulated, experimented, and proved or disproved. It has the intricacy of Mathematics, the fascination of Physics, and the effect of Psychiatry. We need to look out for all learned intellectuals to supplement their knowledge, to derive a new strategy for research, and to pass on our ANCIENT TRADITIONS to the coming generations.
Astrology is born with history. The existence of the entire earth is based on the Sun. Sun, heavenly Gods, and stars are all the causes of rains. To show gratitude, it is customary to perform Yagnas. Upon receipt of crops, performance of Yagnas gives the Havissam to these bodies. The Vedas advocate “Yagna Karmas.” The time for performing Yagnas is also determined in the Vedas. Astrology indicates the method of identifying auspicious times. In this way, Astrology became a Vedanga as a time-indicatory science. It took a prominent position among all the Vedangas, like that of human science.
Food is essential for all living beings. The production of food depends on rains. Seasons are causes for rain. Seasons depend on the Sun. So, the rains and seasonal changes like winter came into existence since that time. Astrology reflects the routine activities of human beings with a sense of time, referred to as “Prakruthi Dharma.”
In the Vedas, plenty of astrological aspects like Samvatsara kala (year), Chandra masa (lunar month), Surya masa (solar month), allocated days, months, seasons (ritu), ayans, years, yugas, planetary orbits with their details, and stars’ equinoxes were clarified.
The Vedas are the primitives of all world literature. Western scholars have expressed various opinions about their antiquity. Weber opined that the Vedas are “age-long.” Max Muller researched and dated the Vedas to 1200 BC. McDonald reexamined them as 1500 BC, Witney as 2000 BC, and Brenhauter as 200 BC. Geological researchers indicate that ancient Aryavartha had four boundaries. Before the evaporation of these four seas, the Rigveda came into existence. This shows that astrology exists for more than one lakh years, according to Siddhantha.
“Bharateeya Jyothisha” of Dr. Nemi Chandra Sastry gives the following division of time:
Period before to 10,000 BC — Andhakara (Dark) Kala
10,000BC to 500 BC — Udaya (Rising) Kala
500 BC to 500 AD — Adi (Ancient) Kala
501 AD to 1000 AD — Poorva Madhya Kala
1001 AD to 1600 AD — Uttara Madhya Kala
1601 AD up to now — Adhunik (Modern) Kala
The creation, the growth of living beings in it, movements, different shapes, natures, and energy for motion are factors to be known for the utility of mankind. The knowledge of science arises from deep thinking and the constant search for the cause behind human acts and thoughts.
After observing all these, primitive man concentrated on enjoying happiness by identifying DIK (direction), DESA (place), and KALA (time). Gradually, lifestyle changed—from food knowledge, medical knowledge, and moral science to reduce conflicts, to spiritual science to achieve happiness and a prosperous life. He moved out according to time to collect food, experiencing happiness, sorrows, and illness. To remove illness and maintain sound health, he invented the use of herbs as medicine and followed spiritual paths for greater enlightenment.
Since time immemorial, saints recognized the effects of planetary forces on human beings and included them in the Vedas, as they could visualize these planets and their effects through Yogadristi (Vision). The various aspects of time and its determination made astrology take a prominent place.
Veda means a science worth knowing. Vedas are not meant solely for astrological aspects; they were taught whenever there was an occasion. On examining the Vedas, it is understood that astrology was mingled with the routine schedules of mankind. In the Vedas, plenty of astrological aspects were explained along with various other Dharma Sastras.
We find in Vedic culture, areas of study, progress, and expression that are as relevant today for human advancement as they were thousands of years ago. India and its Vedic culture have contributed much to the world, such as music, astronomy, holistic medicine, and the mathematical system.
In Vedangas:
Sikha/Sikshna [Phonetics]: The ways of pronunciation of ‘Varnas’ and ‘Swaras’. It further deals with the pronunciation of Udatta, Anudatta, Swanita, Harswa, Deergha, and Pluta of Veda mantras. Thirty scripts are available on this subject at Yajnavalkya Siksha. Paninneeya Siksha is prominent.
Vyakarnam [Grammar]: This knowledge helps gain command over language and pronunciation. Panini is the famous book on Vyakarnam.
Chandas [Metre]: The beauty of a sentence or sloka in literature is achieved through proper usage of varna, laya, etc. Nirukta deals with various aspects of word meanings, Mantrartha Devatas, and the appropriate use of phonic sounds in context.
Astrology: Jyothi means light, and light rays naturally emanate from the Sun. Since time immemorial, the Sun, Moon, stars, and planets have been recognized as sources of light and other types of energy.
Kalpa: Shrouta Sutras, Griha Sutras, and Sulbha Sutras are collectively termed Kalpa. The Vedas are called Shruti. Daily life principles are in Shrouta Sutras. Family life, including wife and husband relations, is detailed in Griha Sutras. Performing Yagna, the size of the Yagna Kundali, and related procedures are in Sulbha Sutras.
As such, astrology initially started as a special science among Vedangas and took prominence in day-to-day human activities. Astrology is treated as the “Eye of Vedapurusha.”
Rigi Jyothisha, written by Lagada, is the initial book on astrology, dating to 500 BC [36 karkas are available]. At a later period, Yajusha Jyothisha, with 49 slokas, deals with Kala Parva knowledge. In Vedic Jyothisha, only Sun and Moon transits are explained; other planets are not included.
Atharva Jyothisha pertains to predictive astrology, comprising 162 stanzas in 14 chapters. It is a form of discussion by Pitamaha and Kasyapa and explains the division of time, furious stars (Roudra Nakshatras), mild stars (Soumya Nakshatras), Karma Yoga Nakshatras, and Karana Nakshatras.
According to ancient Indian history, people often died of simple ailments. The Rishis aimed to eradicate them, acquiring knowledge that was codified as Ayurveda.
Thus, astrology and Ayurveda are two limbs of Vedic sciences, like branches of the same tree. Many astrologers practiced Ayurveda, and many Ayurveda doctors were astrologers. Ayurveda is primarily based on the concept that the planets and their movements are intimately connected with the human body and mind. Astrology determines the basic physical constitution of human beings and indicates which planet affects which part of the body. Ayurveda provides cures using various herbs, roots, metals, and extracts. Therefore, understanding the relationships between planets and plants, as well as the effects of planets on human minds, is essential.
Astrology and Ayurveda share much in common and both are grounded in Vedic science and the planetary influence on living beings. Ayurveda views ailments as a natural process, with cures also derived from nature. Its three main aspects are:
- Aetiology – the science of the causes of disease
- Symptology – the study and interpretation of symptoms
- Medication – the ways and means of curing diseases
The system aims to understand the eternal truths of the human body, mind, and spirit, seeking permanent cures.
Sounds provoke various mental responses in humans, such as headache, irritation, or pleasure. Animal and bird sounds are not uniform in nature. The Swaras, taking form as Ragas, reveal that Ragas born due to positive aspects of planets can cure diseases caused by the negative effects of the same planets. The planetary varnas and the musical sangeeta varnas are comparable.
Planets Varnas Colors
Ravi [Sun] Ga Gold color
Moon Ma White with yellow tint
Mars Ri Red
Mercury Sa Green
Jupiter Da Yellow
Venus Ni Multi-color
Saturn Sa Black
The relation between colors and swaras, and colors and planets, has been thoroughly studied and is used for curing diseases. Among swaras, Hindola is associated with love, Deepaka raga with kindness, Megha raga with daringness, and Bhairava raga with peace. Scientists have experimentally derived and confirmed these utilities through experience. However, one cannot conduct laboratory experiments regarding the effects of planets.
In the evaluation of Indian astrology, Astro-Mathematics was developed. In 476 AD, Aryabhata and Bhaskar made significant contributions, which remain popular even today. Notably, the concept of zero is attributed to their findings.
In Aryabhateeya, there are four main chapters: Geetika Pada, Ganita Pada, Kalakriya Pada, and Gola Pada. Aryabhata also created technical symbols, where each alphabet represents a specific number.
A = 1
I = 100
U = 100 = 10,000
Ru = 100 = 10, 00,000
Iu = 100 = 100,000,000
E = 100 = 10,000,000,000
Ai = 100 = 1,000,000,000,000
O = 100 = 100,000,000,000,000
Au = 100 = 10,000,000,000,000,000
Ka = 1 Ta = 11 Pa = 21 Sha = 80
Kha = 2 Tha = 12 Pha = 22 Ksa = 90
Ga = 3 Da = 13 Ba = 23 Ha = 100
Gha = 4 Dha = 14 Bha = 24
Nya = 5 Na = 15 Ma = 25
Cha = 6 ta = 16 Ya = 30
Chha = 7 tha = 17 Ra = 40
Ja = 8 da = 18 La = 50
Jha = 9 dha = 19 Va = 60
Ni = 10 na = 20 Sa = 70
The total rotation of the Sun presented as Khu, Yu, Ghr, means Khu,Yu, Ghr if it deco defied that Sun’s rotation are 4,320,000 years.
In Ganita Pada : It consists of 33 stanzas. He explained the numbers, which are increased in 10.
Eka = 1
Dasa = 10
Sata = 100
Sahasra = 1000
Koti = 10,000,000
Arbuda = 100,000,000
Vrinde = 1,000,000,000
Remaining stanzas explained Square, Cube, Square Root, Cube Root, Vargas, Kshetra, Ghana phala, Kshetra phala of triangles, cone, circle, and its kshetraphala gola ghana phala etc., Circles, radius, circumferences were given.
Before introduction of Indian Astrology, Western Scientists thought that ‘Sine’ was first introduced by ‘Albarooni’ of Arab country. But after observing this “Aryabhateeyam’ westerns changed their mind and accepted that Indians have this theory in 4th and 5th centuries itself. The theory of ‘Pythagoras’ is explained in ‘Sulbha’ sutras. Many countries support this statement.
Kalakriya Pada: There are 25 stanzas, stating time measurement indicated for months, days, Nadi, Kshetra vibhaga is similar to kala vibhaga where divisions of ‘lipta, vilipta, tatparas’ all given this.
Gola pada: There are 50 stanzas, indicated the sun movements, starting point from Aries to Virgo moves to North and from Libra to Pisces towards South. He explained minimum distance of Sun to the remaining Planets [4th stanza]. The Earth and remaining half part in opposite direction to Sun [5th stanza] like this he explained various aspect including when the person travels on the boat, the trees and other objects on the land appear to the moving opposite direction due to rotation of Earth. Among the ancient astronomers, Aryabhatt was first to accept to Earth rotation theory [11th stanza]. North and South poles, Astro mathematics and calculations of Sun and Moon, Eclipses are indicated.
The greatness of Aryabhatta in the field of astronomy is spread in Arab Countries in 8th and 9th centuries, Almansoor, Almam made it popular. In 360 AD ‘Dayophantas’ and other Greek mathematics scholars had very little knowledge of Geometry compared to ‘Aryabhatta’ who is calculated many unknown results in the field of Geometry.
In the Indian astro-mathematical history ‘Aryabhatta II’ in 950 AD, he wrote ‘Mahasiddhanta’. It is a book on astrology. It contains 18 Chapters namely ‘Adhikaras’ 625 stanzas having the meter of ‘Arya’, specified the ancient astro-mathematics information very clearly and widely given. He also analyzed the calculation of ‘Chaturbhuja’
Other well noted Astro – Mathemations are ‘BHASKARA II and I. Bhaskara I wrote 2 books namely ‘Mahabhasaskareeya and Lagubhaskareeya’ which are available. Another book ‘Aryabatta tantra bhashya’ is not available. He belongs to 629 AD.
Bhaskara II wrote two books ‘Siddhanta Siromani and Karanakutoohala’. Siddhanta Siromani having 4 parts those are “Leelavathi’ [Patiganitha], ‘Beejaganita’, ‘Ganitadhyaya’ and ‘Goladhyaya’. ‘Measurements’ given in the chapters were followed by Indians and other countries also. Further he gave adding, deductions, multiplications, divisions, square, square root, cube, and cube root in details. In “Triprasna vasana’ he explained methods to sun rise, and day etc., Moon is situated below the ‘Pitrudevatas’. While giving the details about eclipses, he supported mythological view of ‘Rahu’ is the cause for this. In ‘Brihatsamhita Varahamihara also told the same with slight changes.
In ‘Yantradhyaya’ many details about ‘machines’ and calculation of the planetary planes. He told that the ‘mind’ [Buddhi] is the good machine of all, and ‘Gola’, ‘Nadeevalaya’, ‘Yashti’, ‘Shanku’, ‘Ghati’, ‘Chakra’, ‘Chapa’, ‘Turya’, and ‘Phalaka’ are nine machines and their details given.
Evolution of astrology in western countries: Astrological researchers are continuing in all places of the world wherever light is found. Firstly, their researches started by astro-materials in the sky. When they say one theory, it may turns to another theory in a new way.
‘Ptolemy’ [ancient yavana writer] is the first person among western famous astrologists. He wrote an astrology book ‘Tetro Biblos’ in four volumes. Alen Leo is famous for modern astrology.
Mespatomea: There are two rivers as the home for the ancient civilization namely ‘Tigris and Euphretis’. This country is combined with ‘Asseerians and Babiloneans’ in 607 BC They preserved their observations on mud-plates. Their Ephemeris is depending on the new-moon day.
Ezypt: Known for ancient civilization in 4000-3000 BC. It seems Greeks [yavanas] learnt geometry here. They prepared their Ephemeris depend on rise of Sirius star.
China: The Chinese people made astronomical studies from 4000 BC calculating the eclipse and in 2608 BC built a planetarium to correct the mistakes in Ephemeris. In China and Veda of India their researches made number studies constellations.
Greeks: The famous Greek scientists and their astronomy and astrological researchers are ‘Pteleez’ 640 BC, ‘Pythogrous’ 550 BC, ‘Eudaxus’ 400 BC, ‘Aristorcus’ 275 BC, ‘Eratosyneez’ 230 BC, ‘Apaloneas’, 200 BC, ‘Hiporcus’ 150 BC.
(i) Astronomy, (ii) Almanac, (iii) Astrology, (iv) Horary, (v) Omens; the five branches together become astrology. A mathematical calculation of planets and influences on human life is called astrology and their overall influence becomes ‘Samhita’. It got recognition as separate branches in the sciences of astrology. The methods mentioned in astrology for proper performance of various religious functions in the day-to-day life are ‘Samhita’. It is an encyclopedia. The study of earthquakes, exploration of earth, investigations in determining directions, atmosphere, orbit etc., were clearly enumerated.
It is essential to conduct research on various topics in Astrology / Samhita on the original rules contained in the old texts for the benefit of the society.
Meteorological Observations:
The investigations into the atmosphere are a special item under Samhita. The total amounts of rainfall during the year and instant rains and their knowledge have been already famous. The transitions of the Sun in various constellations have been treated as Kaartes of those particular constellations. The rainfall, its volume is made known through the available proverbs of villagers. It shows that the knowledge of samhitas already existed with the villagers. A careful study of these subjects combined with day-to-day practical knowledge gives fruitful results. By this we can be able to take precautionary measures which will be more advantageous to farmers.
Astro-meteorology is a science dealing with laws governing atmospheric conditions and rainfall, storms and cyclones, etc., which are most important for mankind. The hypothesis of the ancient astrologers is that star and planetary power are transmitted to earth without attenuation or with distance and mass. Scientists could not assimilate, understand and imagine such a hypothesis, since it is not amenable for verification through their laboratories. Gravitational waves because of magnetic disturbances are electrical disturbances, so that SUNSPOTS synchronized with sudden and violent electric currents in the earth, are synchronized with oscillations in the atmosphere. Since atmospheric pressures synchronizes with rain, wind storms and earthquakes; the ebbs and tides of gravitational waves of universe control the solar system and the solar system is controlled by sun. Sun absorbs star and planet power, transmits it to the moon and is reflected back to the earth. So, sun is the transmitter and moon is the reflector. The most important planet which induces a cyclone is the moon who gives finishing touch in timing the depressions, cyclones etc.
Usefulness of ALMANAC:
The kalayadyabdas [number of years passed on from commencement of kali yuga] are useful to count the long duration belonging to the apices. At present the historical events are counted with reference to ‘Huna saka’ [Christian era]. Prior to the introduction by the British people in our country, the time was counted with reference to ‘Salivahana saka’. ‘Hijari’ is a saka of Mohammedans.
The Almanac consists of ‘Tithi’ [lunar day], ‘Vara’ [week-day], ‘Nakshtra’ [star], ‘Yoga’ [combined effect of the Sun and Moon], and ‘Karana [half part of a lunar day].
Almanac can show the time of sunrise and sunset of the day, lunar month, ritu cycles, festivals, muhurtas for doing auspicious functions, intricate details of quantum of rainfall along with the stage of growth of agricultural yield with effects of transits of the sun, diseases, digits of gains and loses, rajayoga and avamanam [Kandaya phalas] in that particular year with reference to the birth star. Inauspicious muhurtams ‘Moudhya’ [Jupiter and Venus combustion with Sun] periods and ‘Subha Muhurtams to perform functions etc. Apart to this, the procedure of formation of ‘Nava Nayakas and analysis of their results and the effects of the planets influencing the conditions of the country, rain fall of the year and its suitable types of crops to be taken up in the agriculture operations can be thought over.
Birth is common to all living beings. Just like human beings animals also had handsome and beautiful body occurs. The prominent animals like, cow, dog, horse, elephant etc occupy unique importance in animal palmistry. The influence of the animals do good or bad reflects to the owner. More and more details about animal palmistry are in the works of Samhita to distinguish auspicious and inauspicious signs of the animals.
To conclude from the above truths and facts, Indian scholars proved a theory not only in Indian traditional ways but also in modern theory of mathematics through astrology defiantly, enable to know all day-to-day human life activity in related with planetary movements. Not only that, the Vedic science of astrology explains insight of knowledge of botany, zoology, metrology, psychology, medical [ayurveda] field. Hence, it is appropriate to say that astrology is a prominent and primitive science among all traditional sciences.
Email: bhawaanbrv@gmail.com
References:
- Fundamental of Astrology, SPT University, Hyderabad, India.
- Astrology History, SPT University, Hyderabad, India.
- Samhithas, SPT University, Hyderabad, India.
About the Author:
Dr. Bhawaan has been awarded an Honorary Doctorate of Philosophy in Astrology by the Interamerican University of Humanistic Studies (U.S.A.) and is a member of the Astrological Association (U.K.) and the International Vedic Federation (U.S.A.).
He is an Astrological consultant and specialist in Muhurtam, Medical Astrology (Research Project), Compatibility of Horoscopes, and Predictive Astrology.
He is also the President of the Hyderabad Chapter of the International Federation of Astrology & Spiritual Sciences and Secretary of the Hyderabad Science Association.
Introduction on the Art of Varma
Dr. N. Shunmogom
Varmam is a divine art. It cannot be measured by the existing scientific equipments or apparatus. Its true form is to attain enlightenment. Its external form is to prevent diseases and cure diseases. Its spurious form is martial art. At present, its spurious form is treated as true form. The world is scared by its martial art form. But if we bring out its true form, the world will bow to varmam.
The immortal art of varmam is developed over a period of time by persons who were kind to living beings. Varmam is energy. This energy is used for body enrichment, life longevity, and mind flourishing. Varma energy forms within the body when the collection of universal energy of Prana penetrates the unit of Akasam (Space). This energy is deposited in different parts of the body in different forms. It gives strength to the gross body, subtle body, and energy body. One who knows the location of these energy spots is known as Varma Gnani (wisdom of varmam). One who knows how to transform this varma energy into divine energy is known as Varma Yogi.
More than a hundred different titles of varma texts are available for this field. All the available texts are not in book form; instead, they are in manuscript form. At present, this art is in practice in India, specifically in Kanyakumari district in Tamilnadu. The art can be learned through gurukulam practice.
Through this art, everyone can learn to protect their body and life force from diseases. One can treat existing diseases. Thirumoolar Varma Research and Therapy Centre has obtained a lot of evidence to prove varmam can cure diseases. These evidences are accepted by allopathic and Indian indigenous registered medical practitioners. These evidences are of great surprise to the modern medical field. Currently, more than 1000 medical practitioners from various fields like Allopathic, Siddha, Ayurveda, etc., have learned varmam treatment methodology through our institute. Even non-medical persons are learning this art. [Thirumoolar Varma Research and Therapy Centre is a unit of Art Research Institute (ARI), which is a registered public charitable trust.]
Through varma energy, one can attain inner peace. One can attain spiritual bliss. This art contains wonderful techniques to bring out the divine power hidden within us. Kabilar’s Sangiyam, Buddha’s Buddhism, Hindu religion, and all other religions in the world have grown out of the basic philosophies of this varma art. Keen researchers in the religious fields will deduce the truth of varmam behind every religion.
The art of varmam forms the core thread of fields like the medical field, astrology, art of yoga, vasthu, tantric art, mantras, yantras, sexual art, art of sculpture, Bharatham, anga sastra (study of body structure and gesture), dhwani sastra (study of sound), food science, art of living techniques, music, aurotation, breathing techniques, martial art, techniques to bring animals under control, theory of rasam (how the body expresses what the mind thinks), techniques to enhance the body, art of asthra (spiritual energy flow), techniques to enhance mind power, and so on.
The evidences for this magnificent art are recorded in Tamil by Siddhars who lived in Tamilnadu. This art can be practiced with proper learning. We should bring out the real varmam art to human society. Only then will the world understand the great contribution made by India.
We should bring out the contribution made by Vedha Sathi as varmam to world spirituality, world religion, world health, human society, fine arts, food science, and so on.
If people with the same frequency can work together and develop varmam, the world’s attention will turn towards India. India’s economy will grow. India will become the world.
Flourish Vedha Sathi
About the Author:
The author is an Advisory Board Member of the Arts Research Institute at Coimbatore, India.
Alternative to Government Control of Hindu Mathas and Temples
Despite initial reluctance of the judiciary during the British colonial rule, temples and mathas came under more and more intrusive judicial intervention even in the colonial days. This was largely because of petty-minded quarrels among influential devotees (a classic example is the Vaishnavas’ long and bitter infighting in South India), greedy sevadars, hereditary beneficiaries of devotee offerings to the deity, and power-hungry ‘trustees’. Over time, blatant misuse by the ’matathipathi’ of the matha property and income, and systematic plunder of temple wealth and mismanagement, resulted in strong public opinion—including that of educated and religiously inclined elite—in favour of State intervention.
Starting with Tamilnadu in the 1920s, State governments began to bring these places of reverence under their increasing supervision over a period of about 80 years, on the ground that temples and mathas were places of public importance and interest and should not be allowed to be misused or be centers of in-fighting. But after Independence, the motive of legislation became government control (instead of regulation) of the financial and other assets of these places of religious importance to Hindus. Misinterpretation of the Constitution by the Judiciary, both in the States and the Center, aided this development. The avarice of elected legislators and ministers made temples virtually a government department, particularly in the Southern States. The moneys and patronage involved were simply irresistible.
Today, the Tamilnadu Endowment Act and Rules, the oldest, is the model for similar law in States such as Andhra Pradesh. In many States, big and ancient individual temples are controlled under specific individual laws. Examples are Varanasi Kashivishwanath temple, Bhadrinath, and Kedarnath, etc. The term ‘temple’ or ‘matha‘ does not occur in the Constitution. They are strangely treated as no more than “public religious and charitable institutions”—not as places of worship—in the Concurrent List of the Constitution.
The Sir C.P. Ramaswamy Iyer Commission, appointed in 1960 by the Government of India to look into temple and matha management in the country, produced a classic and comprehensive report in 1962. It recognized matters of gross mismanagement in places of Hindu reverence but emphasized that government should have only a regulatory role in improving matters, and such regulatory role should also apply to Muslim and Christian places of worship. It also:
(i) Wanted a model law to be drafted by the Central government;
(ii) Insisted that temple income and wealth must be spent only on temples and in strengthening knowledge of Hindu religion and philosophy among the Hindu populace, and in training of archakas and pujaris.
A Religious Trusts Bill introduced in the Parliament was, however, allowed to lapse. Pseudo-secularism had already begun to raise its ugly head. The States were left to do what they pleased with Hindu places of worship and teaching. Christian and Muslim places of worship were left out of the State legislations.
Why should places of worship and reverence be under devotee control?
The present regime of control of only Hindu places of reverence is blatantly discriminatory against the majority population. In Hindu tradition, temples were not merely places of periodic visit for worship of the deity. They were places of social, literary, and cultural expression of Hindu society. Places of Hindu worship and reverence were also places of sacred pilgrimage for people from far and wide in the country.
Thus, temples and mathas played a major role in establishing sacred connectivity and essentially a common understanding of life’s values and philosophy, among Hindus in various nooks and corners of this vast land of ours, irrespective of their language and local customs. Temples and mathas were thus verily living and vibrant symbols of Hindutva, the tattva (essence) of Hindu Dharma and philosophy.
Government management of temples has tended to make them establishments of sterile commercialism, centers of mere tourist attraction, and bureaucratic centers of pelf and patronage. Devotee management of places of spiritual reverence to Hindus will, besides restoring their sanctity, bring back the sense of self-esteem and pride in their tradition to the Hindu populace, long lost because of several centuries of colonization, brutality, and religious oppression. It will bring a sense of unity to Hindus, rejuvenate Hindu Dharma and society, and make them once again the envy of the world.
Thus strengthened in a wholesome manner, Hindus can play an effective role in fostering social harmony in the country.
What is required to regain devotee control and management
These places of Hindu worship and teaching have been managed by a well-entrenched and large bureaucracy under legislative control for a long time. A huge case law, generally adverse to Hindu sensitivities, has accumulated over the years thanks to much puerile litigation.
We will, therefore, need to establish the credibility of the new model of governance evolved, to the satisfaction of State organs including the Judiciary, as well as of the common temple-going Hindu masses who look for proper treatment, orderliness, and financial accountability. Reasonable traditional arrangements of remunerating sevadars and long-standing trusteeships would need to be accommodated.
The only way this can be done is for temples, small and medium ones to begin with, to be actually run efficiently by local Hindu temple committees. The manner in which the committees are put in place, the manner in which succession takes place from time to time, the transparency and accountability that the committees show in financial and personnel management, and the support they receive from stakeholders, are all crucial for the new model of governance to gain credibility and succeed.
The first step, therefore, is to form such committees and to run temples which are not under any State law and gain grassroots experience and responsibility.
The possible route to regain control
There appears to be good ground to challenge the constitutionality of government control of places of Hindu reverence. This aspect is dealt with briefly in the next section. But it seems virtually impossible, with the present constellation of political parties and forces, to get the State legislatures or the Parliament to enact any significant change either in the Endowment law or in the Constitution. All politicians, irrespective of the political party, are now benefiting from temple property, temple income, and the associated patronage system.
Large-scale Hindu public agitation could help, but sustaining it till success is achieved is very difficult, considering the fragmented nature of the Hindu political mass. By a process of elimination, we come to litigation. High-quality Constitutional battle appears a viable option. But steps to implement this option must go hand in hand with the implementation, State-wise, of the suggestions in paragraph 3 above.
Legal and Constitutional aspects
The Constitution says that the Indian Republic is ‘secular’. It is, therefore, a travesty to allow the State to interfere in the present manner in the control of places of Hindu religious sanctity. The travesty becomes worse when such interference is only in respect of one religion—the religion of the vast majority, Hinduism.
It is open to argument if the term ‘denomination’ in the Constitution has been defined and treated rightly and fairly by the Courts from the standpoint of Hinduism. There is ambiguity and perhaps contradictory opinion in several judgments on what is ‘secular’ and what is ‘religious’ in the affairs of a temple.
It is not certain if a temple can be categorized as merely a ‘religious and charitable institution’ (Entry 28, List III of the Constitution) and laws to control temples and mathas can be enacted, overriding the Fundamental Rights guaranteed under Article 25 of the Constitution to all citizens in regard to practice of religion. Another relevant aspect is whether protective rights under the Constitution of ‘minorities’, meant to prevent possible ‘majority’ oppression in our democracy, can be construed and interpreted as privileges not available to the ‘majority’.
It is also to be noted that in many cases affecting temples and mathas which went before higher courts in the country, it was the claims of hereditary trustees and other sevadars that were pressed and contested under the pretext of ‘religious freedom’ and adjudicated upon; the more basic issue of religious freedom of Hindu society at large in respect of places of sacred reverence to it does not seem to have been specifically and effectively argued or considered.
Elements of a Model of Good Governance of Temples and Mathas
Any system of good governance of places of worship, religious teaching, and reverence of Hindus should rest on the following basic principles:
- The mechanism of governance should rigorously obviate mismanagement and should be transparent and accountable but confine government to a regulatory role and not allow it to get into a control mode.
- There is some opinion in the country that the model to be canvassed should completely keep government out of temple legislation and leave everything to devotee hands. If statutory recognition is to be sought, it is not possible to keep government totally out of the picture because implementation of any statute has necessarily to have a nexus with government.
Given the impossibility of having a single religious authority, in the very nature of Hindu Dharma, the State cannot be just wished away. Without some supervisory authority on non-religious matters, from whatever distance it may be exercised, it is very unlikely that all stakeholders in temple management can be taken along to support a new system of governance that insists on accountability and transparency.
The SGPC Act applicable to Sikhs and the Wakf Act applicable to Muslim trusts are hardly suitable models. The former is basically a political instrument; the latter is a dead letter for all intents and purposes.
Elections on the Western model for governing entities of temples should not be immediately attempted. Elections are not likely to promote harmony and unitedness, nor will they result in good governance of temples, given the fractious nature of society and insufficient democratic maturity, which we witness in India even after 50 years of Constitutional democracy.
State Level Governance Structure
There should be a Statutory Dharmic Council in each State. Members should be venerated Acharyas of ancient Sampradayas and mathas in the State, and widely respected and eminent exponents of Hindu Dharma.
A Committee comprising the Chief Justice of the State High Court, the Chief Minister of the State, and the Leader of the Opposition (if any of them is not a temple-worshipping Hindu, the next senior most member in the institution who fulfils that criterion) shall invite suggestions, select, and nominate the members. In filling up the Council, the Committee may consult those who already stand nominated. Suitable criteria for membership could be evolved.
The Council should reflect all the ancient Sampradayas in the State and should have in its membership at least two lay Hindus, erudite in Hindu Dharma and knowledgeable in managing religious entities. The number of members may not exceed eleven. It may be reconstituted once in a few years on a rotational basis to ensure participation by all Sampradayas and continuity.
This Council shall be the ultimate authority to decide on all matters of spiritual and religious nature. The Council shall also have general powers of supervision in respect of all Dharmic aspects in the governance of all places of sacred reverence to Hindus in the State.
Statutory Hindu Religious Tribunal
There shall be a Statutory Hindu Religious Tribunal in each State, with three members. A retired Judge of the High Court or the Supreme Court shall preside over this Tribunal. A personage of great Hindu Dharmic scholarship and a retired civil servant highly regarded for integrity and administrative capability shall be the other members.
Membership of the Tribunal shall not be open to politically active persons. The Chief Justice of the State High Court shall nominate the Chairman of the Tribunal and, in consultation with him, select the other two members. This Tribunal shall be the final authority on all non-religious (temporal) matters, which come under dispute or question.
All matters connected with temple trustees, the welfare of sevadars, pujaris, and archakas, and associated personnel shall be finally decided by this Tribunal. Appeal against the Tribunal’s decision shall lie only in the Supreme Court, subject to its procedures. The Tribunal shall be reconstituted at five-year intervals on a rotational basis.
Temple Management Board
The only other State-level entity required is a Temple Management Board of five members. The State government should constitute it. The Statute should prohibit the nomination to the Board of serving government officials or persons active in politics, but mandate membership of women. Members shall be temple-worshipping Hindus, with a good record of public service.
The Board will have quasi-judicial authority in implementing the Statute, supervise (not control) the financial and administrative management of temples and mathas. It shall not have a large bureaucracy. Its main purpose is to educate, encourage, and guide temple management committees in transparent and accountable management of temples. Appeals against the Board’s decision shall lie with the Tribunal.
Temple Level Committees
Individual temples or groups of small temples of the same Sampradaya shall have individual temple management committees. They should have rotating membership once in a few years. The manner of nominating this committee is for further careful thought. The Statute shall provide specifically for membership of women and Hindus of all classes and ‘castes’ in these committees.
At the District or regional level, as may be required by the number of temples and mathas, there shall be Committees to supervise the temple-level committees. They will also operate as localized dispute-settling entities. Representation of individual temple management committees could be provided for in these Committees. Minimum qualifications shall be prescribed for the membership of temple and regional committees.
Use of Temple Income
Obligatory and desirable purposes shall be prescribed in the Statute for the use of temple income. Expenditure proposals for any purpose other than temple rituals and immediate temple needs shall be subject to scrutiny and prior approval of an independent and competent committee for each temple or group of small temples.
Illustratively, obligatory purposes are: proper performance of temple rituals; training of archakas, adhyapakas, and reciters of holy texts; loan liabilities; repair, renovation, and extension of temple premises; cleanliness and hygienic maintenance of pilgrim amenities.
Desirable purposes are: free food supplies to pilgrims; propagation of fundamentals of Hindu Dharma; commissioning and publication of religious literature; financing scholarly research in Hindu history and publications; promotion of temple architecture, sculpture, and fine arts; creation and maintenance of schools and colleges specializing in Hindu religion and philosophy; poor homes for destitute devotees, Hindu widows and aged people; and socio-economic welfare activities among needy communities.
Dharmic Fund and Auditing
A Dharmic Fund shall be constituted at the State and at the district or regional level. Each temple with sufficient income shall contribute a portion of its income to these Funds, as prescribed. These Dharmic Funds are to be utilized for rejuvenation, education, and welfare of poor and underprivileged communities of Hindu society in accordance with Rules under the Statute. These Funds shall be audited, and reports thereof published in the local language.
External and concurrent audit shall be prescribed, and annual accounts mandated to be published for each temple or group of small temples.
Such a model will reflect a fine balance of the Constitutional guarantees, concerns of accountability, authority to enforce the Statute, Case Law, sentiments of Hindu devotees at large, and also reasonable elements of religious tradition. It is very likely to be widely accepted. It will ensure in a constructive manner salutary principles of good governance of places of public worship and reverence of Hindus.
Implementation
As mentioned earlier, a suitable entry point for judicial recourse must be looked for. Simultaneously and without any more delay, temple management committees must be set up State by State and experience gathered in satisfactorily governing temples to which the Endowment Act does not apply.
Intensive legal research must be undertaken under the leadership of a dedicated Entity to be identified, on the massive Case Law, to enable a comprehensive judicial challenge on a solid footing against the Endowment Acts, as indicated in paragraphs 5 and 6 above. This judicial challenge will take some years to fructify and will require the services of some of the best Constitutional lawyers in the country. A substantial Fund is required to be set up for the entire exercise. The dedicated Entity mentioned above should be amenable to be held accountable for efficient use of finances made available and spent.
October 14, 2006
R. Venkatanarayanan










